Analgesic Effect of Esketamine in DCSB in Adultscontrolled Study

NCT ID: NCT05603975

Last Updated: 2022-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-01

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with severe and above degree burns are often complicated with inhalation injury and systemic infection. During debridement and dressing change in such patients, doctors will be more cautious in using analgesics. Patients often moan, shiver and limb movement due to insufficient sedation and analgesia, resulting in unpleasant feelings and experiences, which increases the anxiety of patients during hospitalization. Previous studies have shown that the use of ketamine in burn patients during dressing change can produce good analgesia and maintain stable vital signs.

Esketamine, the dextral monomer of ketamine, has hypnotic, sedative and analgesic effects and could be safely used in clinical anesthesia. Compared with ketamine, esketamine has stronger analgesic efficacy and less circulatory influence, which is more consistent with the characteristics of ideal analgesic drugs in burn dressing. As an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of refractory depression, esketamine has potential social benefits in burn patients due to its rapid antidepressant pharmacological properties. This study hypothesized that esketamine could reduce the pain of dressing change in patients with severe burns and reduce the occurrence of early depression in such patients.

This study adopted a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center design. A total of 52 severe burn patients aged 18-60 years who need debridement and dressing change under sedation and analgesia were included and randomly divided into the experiment group: esketamine would be used in the induction phase; the control group: esketamine would not be used in the induction phase. Both groups were given dexmedetomidine and butofinol before induction, and fentanyl as a remedy during the dressing change phase. The dosage of fentanyl in the dressing change phase, the pain score (SF-MPQ) after recovery, the incidence of sedation-related complication were compared between the two groups.

This study explores the advantages of esketamine in reducing the use of opioids and the pain score of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia Burns

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
This study was double-blind, including subjects, anesthesia operators, data collectors and dressing change operators. Nurse Song Yi opened the random envelope, diluted the drugs with normal saline according to the grouping information and filled them into a 10ml syringe. The syringe was labeled (marked with subject number, name and hospitalization number), and the grouping information was destroyed after confirmation, and confidentiality was strictly observed. Fully equipped drugs are given to the anesthesiologist and empty envelopes are given to the data collector.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EsKetamine Group

The "Esketamine" was administered intravenously at 0.1mg per kilogram of body weight 1min before the dressing change.

Esketamine Hydrochloride Injection 2ml:50mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Esketamine 0.1mg/kg intravenous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

The "Esketamine" was administered intravenously at 0.1mg per kilogram of body weight 1min before the dressing change.

Control Group

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

The "Normal saline" was administered intravenously at 0.1ml per kilogram of body weight 1min before the dressing change.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Esketamine 0.1mg/kg intravenous injection

The "Esketamine" was administered intravenously at 0.1mg per kilogram of body weight 1min before the dressing change.

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline

The "Normal saline" was administered intravenously at 0.1ml per kilogram of body weight 1min before the dressing change.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Normal saline 0.1ml/kg intravenous injection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grades II to IV
* Patients with severe degree burns Ages 18 to 60
* Patients who signed informed consent forms

Exclusion Criteria

* Hepatic and renal insufficiency
* Allergy to intended medication
* History of antidepressant or antipsychotic drug use
* Atrioventricular block of second degree or higher
* Patients who can't cooperate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ZhiHeng Liu

Director, Head of Anesthesiology, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zhiheng Liu, Dr

Role: CONTACT

+8615818505570

Junjie Li, Master

Role: CONTACT

+8613602587542

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20223357006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Medicine for Wound Care Procedures
NCT00701909 COMPLETED PHASE3