Effect of High-dose Target-controlled Naloxone Infusion on Pain and Hyperalgesia During a Burn Injury
NCT ID: NCT02684669
Last Updated: 2024-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-29
2017-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The present study examines if it is possible to foresee individuals who will demonstrate a larger degree of latent sensitization upon challenge with an injury, than others. Using an enriched design high sensitizers (e.g., the upper quartile of individuals developing large areas of secondary hyperalgesia following a mild burn injury) are compared with low sensitizers (lower quartile), regarding the propensity for developing latent sensitization
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of High Dose Naloxone on Secondary Hyperalgesia
NCT01935206
Analgesic and Antihyperalgesic Effects of Morphine and Buprenorphine
NCT01296334
Effect of High-dose Naloxone Infusion on Pain and Hyperalgesia in Patients Following Groin-Hernia Repair.
NCT01992146
Low-Dose Ketamine Infusion During Burn Wound Care
NCT06506565
Effect of Ultra-low Dose Naloxone on Remifentanil-Induced Hyperalgesia
NCT03066739
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In a previous study using an electrical pain model in human patients, naloxone (21 microg/kg) increased the established area of secondary hyperalgesia. Further, administration of naloxone and naltrexone to animals following resolution of an inflammatory condition, have demonstrated a reinstatement of hypersensitivity to a noxious stimulus, indicating latent sensitization. It has thus been speculated that endogenous opioids may play an important role in the transition from acute to chronic pain in humans.
Recently, however, the investigators were unable to show reinstatement of secondary hyperalgesia after resolution of a burn injury by administrating naloxone in a low dose (21 microg/kg). Based on these finding the investigators hypothesized, that the negative results may be due to the low dose of naloxone or insufficient tissue injury to generate latent sensitization.
The systemic doses of opioid antagonists used in animal studies to demonstrate latent sensitization have been 0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg of naltrexone or 3-10 mg/kg of naloxone. Further, high doses of 1-2 mg/kg of naloxone have been used in clinical and experimental psychiatric, endocrinological, neurological and nutritional studies in patients and healthy individuals. In one pain related study, 6 mg/kg of naloxone was given to healthy patients intramuscularly. Only mild to moderate, transitory side-effects were recorded in these studies.
The investigators, therefore, initiated a second translational study in which it was hypothesized that a higher dose of naloxone (2 mg/kg) would reinstate secondary hyperalgesia in human patients following resolution of a mild burn injury and thus show latent sensitization in humans. The investigators demonstrated in 4 out of 12 patients that naloxone administered 7 days after a mild burn injury was associated with the reinstatement of secondary hyperalgesia.
The present study examines if it is possible to foresee individuals who will demonstrate a larger degree of latent sensitization upon challenge with an injury, than others. Using an enriched design high sensitizers (e.g., the upper quartile of individuals developing large areas of secondary hyperalgesia following a mild burn injury) are compared with low sensitizers (lower quartile), regarding the propensity for developing latent sensitization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High-dose naloxone
naloxone 4 mg/ml i.v. infusion, total 3.25 mg/kg, target controlled infusion with three infusion rates (0.25 mg/kg; 0.75 mg/kg; 2.25 mg/kg) each of 25 min duration.
Naloxone
active drug infusion
Normal saline
0.9% physiological saline, i.v. infusion, total 0.81 ml/kg, target controlled infusion with three infusion rates (0.06 ml/kg; 0.19 ml/kg; 0.56 ml/kg) each of 25 min duration.
Normal saline
placebo comparator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Naloxone
active drug infusion
Normal saline
placebo comparator
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent
* Urin-sample without traces of opioids (morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, codeine, tramadol, ketobemidone, oxycodone, hydromorphone, dextro-methorphan)
* ASA I
* Body mass index (BMI): 18 \< BMI \< 30 kg/sq.m
In addition Days 2-4:
• Secondary hyperalgesia areas 1 hr after a burn injury belonging to the upper quartile (Q3: high-sensitizers \[n = 20\]) or the lower quartile (Q1: low-sensitizers \[n = 20\]) The selection is made during a separate test day (Day 0 \[n = 80\]).
Exclusion Criteria
* Participants, who cannot cooperate with the investigation
* Allergic reaction against morphine or other opioids (including naloxone)
* Abuse of alcohol or drugs - according to investigator's evaluation
* Use of psychotropic drugs
* Neurologic or psychiatric disease
* Signs of neuropathy in the examination region
* Previous severe trauma to the lower legs with sequelae
* Scarring or tattoos in the examination areas
* Chronic pain condition
* Regular use of analgesic drugs
* Use of prescription drugs one week before the trial
* Use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs 48 hours before the trial
* Does not develop measurable secondary hyperalgesia areas after BI
18 Years
35 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Kentucky
OTHER
mads u werner
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
mads u werner
MD, DMSci
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mads U Werner, MD, DMSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
Bradley K Taylor, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Edwards RR, Ness TJ, Fillingim RB. Endogenous opioids, blood pressure, and diffuse noxious inhibitory controls: a preliminary study. Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Oct;99(2):679-87. doi: 10.2466/pms.99.2.679-687.
Taylor BK, Corder G. Endogenous analgesia, dependence, and latent pain sensitization. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2014;20:283-325. doi: 10.1007/7854_2014_351.
Werner MU, Pereira MP, Andersen LP, Dahl JB. Endogenous opioid antagonism in physiological experimental pain models: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0125887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125887. eCollection 2015.
Brennum J, Kaiser F, Dahl JB. Effect of naloxone on primary and secondary hyperalgesia induced by the human burn injury model. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Sep;45(8):954-60. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450806.x.
Pielsticker A, Haag G, Zaudig M, Lautenbacher S. Impairment of pain inhibition in chronic tension-type headache. Pain. 2005 Nov;118(1-2):215-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.019. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
Koppert W, Filitz J, Troster A, Ihmsen H, Angst M, Flor H, Schuttler J, Schmelz M. Activation of naloxone-sensitive and -insensitive inhibitory systems in a human pain model. J Pain. 2005 Nov;6(11):757-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.07.002.
Campillo A, Cabanero D, Romero A, Garcia-Nogales P, Puig MM. Delayed postoperative latent pain sensitization revealed by the systemic administration of opioid antagonists in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011 Apr 25;657(1-3):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.01.059. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
Corder G, Doolen S, Donahue RR, Winter MK, Jutras BL, He Y, Hu X, Wieskopf JS, Mogil JS, Storm DR, Wang ZJ, McCarson KE, Taylor BK. Constitutive mu-opioid receptor activity leads to long-term endogenous analgesia and dependence. Science. 2013 Sep 20;341(6152):1394-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1239403.
Pereira MP, Werner MU, Ringsted TK, Rowbotham MC, Taylor BK, Dahl JB. Does naloxone reinstate secondary hyperalgesia in humans after resolution of a burn injury? A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, cross-over study. PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064608. Print 2013.
Pereira MP, Donahue RR, Dahl JB, Werner M, Taylor BK, Werner MU. Endogenous Opioid-Masked Latent Pain Sensitization: Studies from Mouse to Human. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 25;10(8):e0134441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134441. eCollection 2015.
Werner MU, Petersen KL, Rowbotham MC, Dahl JB. Healthy volunteers can be phenotyped using cutaneous sensitization pain models. PLoS One. 2013 May 9;8(5):e62733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062733. Print 2013.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-15018869-BI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.