IVIG vs SCIG in CIDP

NCT ID: NCT05584631

Last Updated: 2025-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-11

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Current dosing practices for immunoglobulin G (IgG) may be inadequate in extreme body weight. The current study will evaluate the influence of body composition on intravenous and subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin G in patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current dosing practices for immunoglobulin G (IgG) may be inadequate in extreme body weight. Total (TBW), ideal (IBW), and adjusted (AdjBW) body weight-based dosing strategies are suggested, but these recommendations are based on expert opinion rather than high quality evidence. The adoption of a specific strategy is highly variable depending on the clinician and/or institutional setting. Recently, payors have also adopted strategies to reduce IgG therapy costs of by capping doses. These recommendations are often based on the presumption that IgG distribution is limited to the vascular space. While this assertion is logical, it does not account for changes adipose tissue may confer on target sites, nor does it account for the potential for adipose tissue to function serve as a metabolic sink or a source of inflammatory mediators. The later would be especially important in patients receiving SCIG. Several observational studies have evaluated IgG dosing in obese patients and have been the source of support for dosing strategies. Many of these studies were not representative of specific populations, contained a wide variety of patients with different IgG indications, and had inadequate serum sampling. More recently, the phase III randomized controlled PATH trial did not find a correlation with serum IgG concentrations and clinical endpoints. However, it is important to note that the study was not designed to evaluate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints. There is also considerable interpatient variation in response; therefore, identification of patient characteristics that predict response or IgG change from baseline will be a useful tool to improve patient responses. Our study will evaluate the influence of body composition and other patient characteristics may have on IgG exposure when given intravenously or subcutaneously.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CIDP Immunoglobulin Deficiency Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intravenous immune globulin G

Subjects will receive there current intravenous immune globulin dose.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intravenous immune globulin G

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous immune globulin G dosed based on the subjects's current dose received for the treatment of CIDP.

Subcutaneous immune globulin G

The dosage will be converted from the subject's current intravenous immune globulin G dosage 1:1 (gm per gm).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Subcutaneous immune globulin G

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous immune globulin G converted from the subject's current IVIG dose 1:1.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intravenous immune globulin G

Intravenous immune globulin G dosed based on the subjects's current dose received for the treatment of CIDP.

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous immune globulin G

Subcutaneous immune globulin G converted from the subject's current IVIG dose 1:1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Privigen, IVIG Hizentra, SCIG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged \>18 years with a current diagnosis of CIDP (based on European Federation of Neurological sciences / Peripheral Nerve Society CIDP diagnostic criteria).
* 1:1 conversion of IVIG to SCIG (weekly dose conversion) must fall within 0.2-to-0.4 mg/kg dose for SCIG.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving IVIG for indications other than CIDP will be excluded.
* Patients with liver impairment (elevations in liver enzymes of greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal) or reduced renal function (CrCl \< 50 mL/min) will be excluded
* Active malignancies
* Diabetes
* Myasthenia gravis
* Immunodeficiency
* Autoimmune disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luigi Brunetti

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luigi Brunetti, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Clinical Research Center

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Luigi Brunetti, PhD

Role: CONTACT

2016385868

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luigi Brunetti, PhD

Role: primary

9085952645

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro2019001038

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.