Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Treatment of Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP)

NCT ID: NCT01017159

Last Updated: 2011-11-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-04-30

Study Completion Date

2011-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether subcutaneous immunoglobulin given in small doses, is effective in maintaining the force, in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy compared with placebo (saline infusions), and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

CIDP is an autoimmune disease of the peripheral nervous system, responding well to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), steroids and plasmapheresis. IVIg is effective in treating patients with CIDP, but most of the patients need long time maintenance treatment, which is associated with decreased autonomy and regular hospital admissions. Furthermore many of the patients complain of infusion related side effects such as headache, chills and fatigue, and over time there is problems obtaining intravenous entry because of occlusion of the veins.

There is therefore a critical need for alternative methods to IVIg treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of small doses of immunoglobulin administered subcutaneously (SCIg), compared with placebo. At the same time we compare the efficacy of SCIg with the regular IVIg treatment.

We therefore hypothesize, 1: SCIg is better than subcutaneous placebo infusions, and is as good as IVIg in maintaining muscle function in patients with CIDP. 2: SCIg home treatment is safe and tolerable. 3: SCIg home treatment is preferred to IVIg under hospital admission, by the patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin

Intervention Type DRUG

The subcutaneous immunoglobulin is infused in the subcutaneous tissue on the abdomen twice or thrice a week, with a maximal speed of 2 mL/h. Every time 20 mL is infused, the needle is removed to a new place.

Saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin

Intervention Type DRUG

The subcutaneous immunoglobulin is infused in the subcutaneous tissue on the abdomen twice or thrice a week, with a maximal speed of 2 mL/h. Every time 20 mL is infused, the needle is removed to a new place.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin

The subcutaneous immunoglobulin is infused in the subcutaneous tissue on the abdomen twice or thrice a week, with a maximal speed of 2 mL/h. Every time 20 mL is infused, the needle is removed to a new place.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Subcuvia®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with typical or pure motor CIDP, who meet the clinical or electrophysiological criteria of the EFNS/PNS for certain or probable CIDP and who are in regular treatment with IVIg on one of the neurological departments in Denmark, are eligible for the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Known cancer disease
* Severe medical diseases
* Other immuno modulating treatment than low-dose steroid (prednisolone \< 25 mg/day) within the last 6 weeks before inclusion
* Hepatitis B or C or HIV
* Breast-feeding
* Non-responding to treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin
* Known hypersensitivity to intravenous immunoglobulins or Kiovig

Adverse events:

* In case of severe adverse effects to treatment patients are excluded. Moderate or mild side-effects can be treated with analgetics or steroids for 1-2 weeks during the initial study phase
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

GCP-unit at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Johannes Jakobsen, Dr., MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital, Noerrebrogade, Department of Neurology

Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EudraCT number: 2009-013930-25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id