Validation of the PMR Activity Score and Evolution of Patient-reported Outcomes in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica

NCT ID: NCT05542316

Last Updated: 2025-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

133 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a systemic inflammatory disease that affects elderly people. It is characterized by pain and morning stiffness in the shoulders, pelvic girdles and neck. Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of the treatment. In clinical practice, the disease activity of PMR and corresponding treatment changes are based on the presence of symptoms and inflammatory markers. The interpretation of these abnormalities can be surprisingly difficult, especially when they are not consistent. In 2004, Leeb and Bird developed a composite score for measurement of disease activity in PMR, called the polymyalgia rheumatica activity score. It consists of 5 domains: morning stiffness time, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global assessment, pain and CRP level. However, high-quality evidence on the measurement properties is lacking and there is still no consensus on the optimal cut off point.

Based on a Delphi study with physicians and patients OMERACT defines laboratory markers of systemic inflammation, pain, stiffness and physical function as the four inner core of domains considered mandatory for clinical trials of PMR, most frequently measured by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and/or C-reactive protein (CRP), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, morning stiffness time and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) respectively. Patient's global fatigue was strongly recommended to measure in PMR as well. Recently, a PMR-specific patient-reported outcome measure was developed, called the PMR impact scale. However, outcome measures in PMR studies lack consistency and there is no high-quality evidence on the measurement properties. In addition, the evolution of these patient reported outcomes is not known.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective of this prospective observational trial is to validate the PMR-activity score and to determine the optimal cut-off point to discriminate between disease remission and active disease. The secondary objective is to assess the evolution of the patient reported outcomes during the disease course and their relation with disease activity.

The investigators intend to perform a 12-month, observational prospective trial in patients with recently diagnosed PMR. Patients will be followed and treated as standard of care. Follow-up visits will be planned at 8 weeks, 16 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks. As in standard of care, additional visits can be planned if necessary, e.g. in case of symptoms suggestive of relapse. Each visit ESR, CRP, morning stiffness time, ability to elevate the upper limbs, physician's global assessment and VAS for pain as components of the PMR-activity score and VAS for global health, pain, stiffness and fatigue, HAQ-DI, Short Form Health survey (SF36) and PMR impact scale as patient-reported outcomes will be collected.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with a final diagnosis of PMR

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of PMR based on the judgment of an experienced clinician (affiliated with the general internal medicine or rheumatology department), taking into account all available information (clinical symptoms, biochemical, radiological, and PET results)
* Able to give informed consent
* Understanding and able to write Dutch, English or French

Exclusion Criteria

* Concomitant diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (new diagnosis or being treated for giant cell arteritis)
* Concurrent rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory arthritis or other connective tissue disease
* Patients on glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive drugs for another indication
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Vanderschueren, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospitals Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Leeb BF, Bird HA. A disease activity score for polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1279-83. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.011379.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15361387 (View on PubMed)

Mackie SL, Twohig H, Neill LM, Harrison E, Shea B, Black RJ, Kermani TA, Merkel PA, Mallen CD, Buttgereit F, Mukhtyar C, Simon LS, Hill CL; OMERACT PMR Working Group. The OMERACT Core Domain Set for Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials in Polymyalgia Rheumatica. J Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;44(10):1515-1521. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161109. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28765246 (View on PubMed)

Twohig H, Owen C, Muller S, Mallen CD, Mitchell C, Hider S, Hill C, Shea B, Mackie SL. Outcomes Measured in Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Measurement Properties of Instruments Considered for the OMERACT Core Outcome Set: A Systematic Review. J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):883-893. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200248. Epub 2020 Aug 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32739892 (View on PubMed)

Twohig H, Mitchell C, Mallen CD, Muller S. Development and psychometric evaluation of the PMR-Impact Scale: a new patient reported outcome measure for polymyalgia rheumatica. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Feb 1;62(2):758-765. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac317.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35639659 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S66638

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.