Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
28 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-08-18
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Despite high ergonomic stresses in the OR, and the existence of proven recommendations to address them, only a small number of OR staff are aware of ergonomic solutions and how to apply them. To bridge this gap between knowledge and application, we will assess the ergonomic needs of OR teams and develop an educational simulation curriculum to teach ergonomic recommendations to OR teams (surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing staff and trainees).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees
NCT07089485
Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Receiving Anaesthesia
NCT03535025
A Study to Evaluate ICU Simulation Experience in the Cardiothoracic Surgical Population to Reduce Post-operative Delirium
NCT05159648
The Impact of Perioperative Geriatric Care on Outcomes After Elective Noncardiac Surgery
NCT02975375
Preoperative Survey
NCT05653154
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Poor ergonomic management contributes to the high rate of musculoskeletal symptoms (e.g. neck stiffness and back pain) reported by surgeons, OR nurses, and anesthesiologists. These symptoms impact attentional resources and decision-making, increasing the risk of errors and complications. Furthermore, work-related musculoskeletal disorders lead to absenteeism, reduced career longevity, and burnout.
Ergonomic recommendations and interventions for OR staff, including table height adjustments, patient positioning, and placement of equipment, have been developed and proven effective. However, their usefulness is limited by a general lack of awareness and education among OR teams. Despite this, few formalized ergonomic education programs exist.
Furthermore, existing education programs address ergonomics at the individual-level only, and do not consider the interprofessional team environment, potentially limiting effectiveness. Team influence on ergonomics is reliant on non-technical skills such as communication and situational awareness. However, a busy OR environment, where the focus is rightly on patient safety, does not lend itself well to teaching ergonomic principles or providing live feedback. Fortunately, simulation-based training has repeatedly been shown to be an effective teaching tool for such skills. Simulation-based training is also generally positively perceived by medical learners.
With regard to ergonomics specifically, there is emerging evidence that simulation-based teaching can lead to improvements in focused areas of care, such as patient transfer. However, there is currently no simulation curriculum to teach operative ergonomics overall or as a team-based approach. Thus, comprehensive, interprofessional educational programs are needed to increase both awareness and application of ergonomics in the OR. Our study will build an interprofessional, team simulation curriculum involving surgery, anesthesiology, and nursing staff and trainees to address this critical gap in training.
Objectives
1. Assess the perceived and unperceived ergonomic needs of OR teams (surgical, anesthesiology, and nursing staff and trainees).
2. Develop and pilot an interdisciplinary OR ergonomics simulation curriculum for OR teams.
This exploratory study will take part in 2 Phases.
In Phase I, an interprofessional working group with representatives from surgery, anesthesiology, nursing, physiotherapy, chiropractic, medical education, simulation, and human factors engineering will identify gaps in OR ergonomics to inform the creation of the curriculum. Three strategies will be used to identify problems and assess needs in OR ergonomics: 1) initial literature review; 2) semi-structured stakeholder interviews, 3) direct observation of OR teams performing surgical procedures.
Phase II will involve development and piloting of the educational simulation curriculum with OR teams.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stakeholder Interviews
Semi-structured, open-ended interviews will be conducted via Zoom with a purposive sample of surgeons, anesthesiologists and OR nurses and trainees to identify perceived OR ergonomics issues among stakeholders
No interventions assigned to this group
OR Observations
Live observation of OR teams by teams of two observers (an anthropologist and an ergonomics expert, such as a chiropractor or physiotherapist). This will be done, in addition to the interview studies, to identify unperceived and misperceived needs using an observation data collection tool. Each of the following 4 phases of surgery will be assessed individually: 1) OR preparation (team arrival to wheels-in), 2) wheels-in to incision, 3) incision to closure, and 4) closure to wheels-out.
No interventions assigned to this group
Curriculum Piloting
Participating OR teams will take part in piloting sessions of the developed simulation curriculum to determine if it meets the proposed content objectives and ensure environmental validity.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Research Institute
Toronto, , Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Catherine Parry
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5471
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.