DECISIve - DiagnosE Using the Central veIn SIgn v1.0

NCT ID: NCT05533905

Last Updated: 2024-03-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

113 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-09

Study Completion Date

2023-11-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

DECISIve - DiagnosE using the Central veIn SIgn. A prospective diagnostic superiority study comparing T2\* MRI and lumbar puncture in patients presenting with possible Multiple Sclerosis

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is currently no agreement on the best way to diagnose Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Frequently, people suspected of having MS have a standard MRI scan and undergo a 'lumbar puncture' (a thin needle is inserted between the bones in the lower spine). Patients often report they find it painful and it can cause unintended complications requiring hospitalisations or time off work to recover.

Although the fluid taken during a lumbar puncture can show evidence of disease, this is not always the case. We do not find abnormalities in everyone who has MS but some people with conditions that can mimic MS, but need very different treatment, have similar lumbar puncture abnormalities. Both of these problems can lead to misdiagnosis.

A new MRI scan allows us to see small veins that run through damaged areas of the brain in people with MS. It has been shown that this is a specific finding to MS, seldom seen in other conditions. It is not painful and carries few or no risks.

This research aims to change the way people are diagnosed with MS and reduce the number of lumbar punctures used. Our team will recruit a large number of people from different hospitals whose doctors suspect they may have MS. We will invite them to have the new eight-minute MRI scan. After 18 months, we will find out what diagnosis is eventually reached and compare this to the finding of the new scan. We will compare the accuracy, speed, costs and acceptability of the different tests needed to make a diagnosis of MS and establish if most lumbar punctures can be replaced by a slightly longer MRI scan. This research could provide the NHS with a scientific approach to diagnose MS which is safer, more cost effective and importantly, more acceptable to patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lumbar puncture

A thin needle is inserted between the bones in the spine.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MRI

A scan of the head.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presentation with a typical clinically isolated syndrome (Thompson et al. 2017) for diagnostic evaluation of MS.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Fulfils the diagnosis of MS, as defined by the 2017 revision of McDonald diagnostic criteria (Thompson et al. 2017).
2. Unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of this protocol including the presence of any condition (physical, mental, or social) that, in the opinion of the PI, is likely to affect the participant's ability to comply with the study protocol.
3. Unable to provide informed consent.
4. Contraindication or inability to undergo MRI due to metal or metal implants, pregnancy, claustrophobia, pain, spasticity, or excessive movement related to tremor.
5. Acute COVID-19 infection at time of face-to-face interactions during study (unless investigations can be delayed until considered safe by the responsible clinician and PI) either diagnosed clinically or by acute infection testing
6. Participant required to self-isolate at time of face-to-face interactions during study (unless investigations can be delayed until considered safe by the responsible clinician and PI) due to COVID-19 exposure, shielding due to medical advice, public health advice or governmental advice/laws.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nikos Evangelou

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NUH NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NUH NHS Trust

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19NS022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.