Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in SCA3 Patients

NCT ID: NCT05502432

Last Updated: 2022-08-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-17

Study Completion Date

2019-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Machado-Joseph Disease (MJD) or spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common spinocerebellar ataxia worldwide.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a form of brain stimulation therapy used to treat depression and cerebellar ataxias. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, the investigators will evaluate whether a 15 day treatment with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can improve symptoms (motor symptoms and non-motor symptoms) in patients with MJD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Machado-Joseph Disease (MJD) or spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common spinocerebellar ataxia worldwide. MJD shows remarked clinical heterogeneity and presents with various clinical manifestations, including cerebellar ataxia, limb incoordination, dysarthria, sleep disorders, axonal neuropathy, dystonia, pyramidal signs and, diplopia. No effective treatment is currently available for MJD.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)enables non-invasive modulation of cortical excitability. rTMS targeting cerebellar structures is capable of inducing long-lasting changes in the excitability of cerebello-thalamocortical pathways.

Subjects will be randomized in two groups, one receiving a consecutive 15-day treatment with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and the other receiving sham stimulation with identical parameters. Patients will be clinically assessed at baseline, during intervention period at 7 days and 15 days immediate after treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(rTMS)

15 days with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with active mood.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Consecutive 15-day active treatment with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation(rTMS)

15 days with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with sham mood.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Consecutive 15-day sham treatment with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Consecutive 15-day active treatment with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Consecutive 15-day sham treatment with 1 Hz of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1 .Patients with detectable clinical signs and confirmed genetic diagnosis with SCA3.

2\. SCA3 patients aged 20 - 80 years 3. Patients or their family members have informed consent to the study and signed relevant documents

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Patients who have concomitant epilepsy. 2. History of seizure or heat convulsion. 3. Patients on neuroleptics. 4. History or current unstable hypertension. 5. History of head injury or neurosurgical interventions. 6. History of any metal in the head (outside the mouth). 7. Known history of any metallic particles in the eye, implanted cardiac pacemaker, implanted neurostimulators, surgical clips (above the shoulder line) or any medical pumps.

8\. History of frequent or severe headaches. 9. History of migraine. 10. History of hearing loss. 11. History of cochlear implants 12. History of drug abuse or alcoholism. 13. Pregnancy or not using a reliable method of birth control. 14. Participation in current clinical study.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ning Wang, MD., PhD.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ning Wang, MD., PhD.

National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1505222)

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Neurology ,First Affiliated Hospital Fujian Medical University

Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shiga Y, Tsuda T, Itoyama Y, Shimizu H, Miyazawa KI, Jin K, Yamazaki T. Transcranial magnetic stimulation alleviates truncal ataxia in spinocerebellar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;72(1):124-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.1.124. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11784843 (View on PubMed)

Manor B, Greenstein PE, Davila-Perez P, Wakefield S, Zhou J, Pascual-Leone A. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2019 Feb 12;10:73. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00073. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30809184 (View on PubMed)

Shimizu H, Tsuda T, Shiga Y, Miyazawa K, Onodera Y, Matsuzaki M, Nakashima I, Furukawa K, Aoki M, Kato H, Yamazaki T, Itoyama Y. Therapeutic efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation for hereditary spinocerebellar degeneration. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1999 Nov;189(3):203-11. doi: 10.1620/tjem.189.203.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10674722 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

chiCTR180002013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

rTMS for Cerebellar Ataxia in Children
NCT07211490 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA