Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-20
2025-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Primed Self-controlled Practice on Motor Learning
NCT07197346
Innovative Brain Stimulation for Induction of Learning Plasticity
NCT04140994
rTMS to Improve Motor Function in Autism
NCT06497920
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients
NCT05646134
Comparing Effects of Various Combinations of 6 Hertz(Hz) rTMS & LFrTMS on Motor Recovery Due to Cerebrovascular Disease
NCT03012204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Motor learning involves two distinct neural networks: the associative/premotor and sensorimotor networks. Studies suggest that the associative/premotor network predominates initially, followed by the sensorimotor network. M1 stores movement patterns, whereas S1 appears crucial for initial motor learning and movement adaptation.
rTMS, a non-invasive technique modulating neuronal excitability, has been used to improve motor function in patients with brain injuries. However, its effectiveness in healthy individuals has been variable, especially when stimulating M1 and S1. Prior research suggests that inhibitory rTMS in S1 may influence motor learning, but findings regarding its excitatory effect and comparison with M1 stimulation are mixed.
The primary hypothesis posits that excitatory rTMS in S1 will yield superior motor learning improvements compared to M1 stimulation in healthy individuals. The secondary hypothesis predicts improvements independent of the stimulated area.
The study will involve healthy participants, utilizing tests for accuracy and time. Methodology includes randomization, blind evaluation, and rTMS application based on assigned groups.
With a sample size of 35 subjects per group, data will be analyzed using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests to compare the effects of rTMS on M1 and S1 concerning motor learning in healthy subjects. Results will be considered significant with p \< 0.05, and effect size will be evaluated.
This trial aims to provide clarity on the effectiveness of excitatory rTMS in specific brain areas to enhance motor learning in individuals without neurological pathologies, potentially impacting rehabilitation and motor performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex
Participants in the experimental group will receive 5 weekly sessions of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for two weeks. An excitatory stimulation over the primary somatosensory area corresponding to the dominant hand will be applied. For this purpose, the motor area will be localized and a coil will be placed 2 cm posterior to it. An isolated pulse will be applied to the motor area to ensure that the coil is not placed over the motor area using 110% of the motor resting threshold. After this, 22 trains of 10 Hz at an intensity of 90% of the motor resting threshold will be applied for 4 seconds, with a rest between series of 10 seconds (a total of 880 pulses). After the stimulation, participants will train with the Forced Response training program for a total of 500 correct repetitions and the Purdue Pegboard Test with 4 repetitions for right hand, left hand and both hands.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex
It will be applyed a magnetic field over the Somatosensory cortex of the patient that pretends to hiperexcite the membrans of the neurons inthis area to enhance motor learning
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary motor cortex
Participants in the active comparator group will receive 5 weekly sessions of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for two weeks. An excitatory stimulation over the primary motor cortex corresponding to the dominant hand will be applied. For this purpose, the motor area will be localized, and an isolated pulse will be applied to the motor area to ensure that the coil is placed over the motor area using 100% of the motor resting threshold. After this, 22 trains of 10 Hz at an intensity of 90% of the motor resting threshold will be applied for 4 seconds, with a rest between series of 10 seconds (a total of 880 pulses). After the stimulation, participants will train with the Forced Response training program for a total of 500 correct repetitions and the Purdue Pegboard Test with 4 repetitions for right hand, left hand and both hands.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary motor cortex
It will be applyed a magnetic field over the primary motor cortex of the patient that pretends to hiperexcite the membrans of the neurons inthis area to enhance motor learning
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Participants in the sham group will receive 5 weekly sessions of sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for two weeks.To achieve the placebo, the localization of the area to be stimulated will be carried out but the coil will be placed in a vertical position so the current will not go through the skull and the patient will just feel the vibration, communicating to the participant that it is likely that during the stimulation process he/she will not feel anything. After the sham stimulation, participants will train with the Forced Response training program for a total of 500 correct repetitions and the Purdue Pegboard Test with 4 repetitions for right hand, left hand and both hands.
sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
It will be applied a sham stimulation with the same protocol that pretends to create the illusion of being stimulated
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary somatosensory cortex
It will be applyed a magnetic field over the Somatosensory cortex of the patient that pretends to hiperexcite the membrans of the neurons inthis area to enhance motor learning
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over primary motor cortex
It will be applyed a magnetic field over the primary motor cortex of the patient that pretends to hiperexcite the membrans of the neurons inthis area to enhance motor learning
sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
It will be applied a sham stimulation with the same protocol that pretends to create the illusion of being stimulated
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pain during the study
* Any contraindications to rTMS, such as metal implants, history of epileptic seizures or taking medication that lowers the seizure threshold
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Neuron, Spain
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alfredo LerĂn Calvo, PhD student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Neuron, Spain
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Neuron
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALC001NR004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.