Evaluation of Illinois Agility Performance With Smartphone Applications: A Validity and Reliability Study

NCT ID: NCT05474521

Last Updated: 2022-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-10

Study Completion Date

2022-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Due to the impracticality of accessing the gold standard test devices, researchers have developed easy-to-use and cost-effective smartphone applications that do not require expert knowledge, and these applications have been used to measure different motor abilities. Smartphone applications such as CODtimer, Stopwatch Movie watch, and Seconds Count are used to evaluate the ability to change direction within these biomotor features. However, the validity and reliability of these applications are the subjects of research.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The athletic performance level is one of the main factors that determine the success of an athlete. However, the athletic performance level of an athlete is determined by many motor abilities. One of these motor abilities is agility.

Because agility has been seen as a complex physical skill, valid and reliable tests and test devices are needed to determine the level of agility. Therefore, researchers have developed many test devices using technology and they have aimed to reach gold standards to measure agility ability through these devices. In this context, manual timers were first used to measure agility performance, then devices such as fully automatic test devices, photocell types, video timers, and radar systems were accepted as a test tool for the measurement of agility performance. Although fully automatic test devices are accepted as the gold standard in the measurement of velocity-based parameters, they cannot be preferred by everyone due to obstacles such as the need for expert knowledge and being economically costly for their use.

Due to the impracticality of accessing the gold standard test devices, researchers have developed easy-to-use and cost-effective smartphone applications that do not require expert knowledge, and these applications have been used to measure different motor abilities. Among these motor features, CODTimer App is the smartphone application that is frequently preferred in the evaluation of agility ability and whose validity-reliability studies are conducted.

In the previous studies on the validity and reliability of the CODTimer App, a very strong correlation was found between the CODTimer App and the gold standard automatic timing gates according to the 5+5 and 505 agility test protocols. However, many mobile applications have validity and reliability unexplored. It is necessary to investigate different test protocols and devices to spread the use of mobile applications and prove that they are valid and reliable measurement tools.

This study aimed to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the CODTimer, Second Count, and Stopwatch Moviewatch App with an iPhone 11 compared to gold standard timing gates for the evaluation of Illinois agility performance in college athletes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Training Group Sensitivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

This study was performed according to the predictive correlational research design, which is one of the quantitative research methods. Participants included in the study were determined according to the simple random sampling method. Athletes who studied at the faculty of sports sciences participated in this research and the research was carried out with a single group.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Participant 1

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 2

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 3

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 4

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 5

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 6

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 7

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 8

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 9

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 10

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 11

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 12

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 13

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 14

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 15

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 16

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 17

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 18

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 19

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 20

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 21

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 22

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 23

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 24

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 25

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 26

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 27

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 28

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 29

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Participant 30

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CODTimer test

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CODTimer test

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Stopwatch Moviewatch App Seconds Count Stopwatch Photocell

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Athletes who have not experienced an injury in the last 1 year and have a training history of at least one year.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Huseyin Sahin UYSAL

Research Assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Huseyin Sahin Uysal, Msc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Sport Science

Burdur, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Huseyin Sahin UYSAL

Burdur, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MehmetAkifU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.