Evaluation of Illinois Agility Performance With Smartphone Applications: A Validity and Reliability Study
NCT ID: NCT05474521
Last Updated: 2022-07-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-10
2022-06-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validity and Reliability of the Smart Speed Device
NCT06072144
Development of a Judo Specific Reactive Agility Test: a Reliability and Validity Study
NCT06663774
Speed, Agility, and Quickness Training
NCT06547047
The Effect of Myofascial Release Technique on Sportive Performance, Balance and Injury Risk in Runners
NCT05392153
The Effect of Aerobic Exercise Training on Collegiate eSport Team Players
NCT05317104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Because agility has been seen as a complex physical skill, valid and reliable tests and test devices are needed to determine the level of agility. Therefore, researchers have developed many test devices using technology and they have aimed to reach gold standards to measure agility ability through these devices. In this context, manual timers were first used to measure agility performance, then devices such as fully automatic test devices, photocell types, video timers, and radar systems were accepted as a test tool for the measurement of agility performance. Although fully automatic test devices are accepted as the gold standard in the measurement of velocity-based parameters, they cannot be preferred by everyone due to obstacles such as the need for expert knowledge and being economically costly for their use.
Due to the impracticality of accessing the gold standard test devices, researchers have developed easy-to-use and cost-effective smartphone applications that do not require expert knowledge, and these applications have been used to measure different motor abilities. Among these motor features, CODTimer App is the smartphone application that is frequently preferred in the evaluation of agility ability and whose validity-reliability studies are conducted.
In the previous studies on the validity and reliability of the CODTimer App, a very strong correlation was found between the CODTimer App and the gold standard automatic timing gates according to the 5+5 and 505 agility test protocols. However, many mobile applications have validity and reliability unexplored. It is necessary to investigate different test protocols and devices to spread the use of mobile applications and prove that they are valid and reliable measurement tools.
This study aimed to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the CODTimer, Second Count, and Stopwatch Moviewatch App with an iPhone 11 compared to gold standard timing gates for the evaluation of Illinois agility performance in college athletes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Participant 1
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 2
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 3
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 4
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 5
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 6
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 7
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 8
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 9
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 10
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 11
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 12
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 13
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 14
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 15
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 16
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 17
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 18
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 19
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 20
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 21
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 22
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 23
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 24
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 25
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 26
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 27
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 28
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 29
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Participant 30
The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CODTimer test
The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
25 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Huseyin Sahin UYSAL
Research Assistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Huseyin Sahin Uysal, Msc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Sport Science
Burdur, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Huseyin Sahin UYSAL
Burdur, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MehmetAkifU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.