Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
110 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-01
2027-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Imaging Sodium and Lymphatics in Lymphedema
NCT05242900
Lymphedema Progression Screening Using MRI
NCT02611557
Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Characteristics of Plaque Build-Up in People With Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT00520312
Comprehensive Magnetic Resonance of Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT00587678
Toward an Automated Method of Abdominal Fat Segmentation of MR Images
NCT01228968
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the past four years, multi-disciplinary study from investigators in radiology, vascular medicine, and physical therapy has demonstrated that lipedema has distinct characteristics from obesity. Using whole-body fat-and-water MRI, lipedema is characterized by a 42% higher lower-extremity SAT deposition compared to BMI-matched females without lipedema (p\<0.001). Using noninvasive sodium MRI technologies, skin sodium is also elevated in patients with lipedema compared to controls (14.9±2.9 vs. 11.9±2.0 mmol/L, p=0.01) in the lower extremities, but not upper extremities. Importantly, skin sodium decreases following 6-weeks of lymphatic stimulation by complete decongestive therapy (CDT) in preliminary study of patients with lipedema. These tissue signatures are consistent with those of patients with known lymphatic insufficiencies (i.e., secondary lymphedema). Recent findings of elevated arterial perfusion and inflammatory profiles in lipedema raise significant questions about how blood and lymphatic circulation are involved in lipedema.
The critical barrier to interrogating these systems, and more broadly addressing clinical unmet needs for evidence-based therapies for patients with lipedema, is that noninvasive lymphatic imaging strategies are traditionally underdeveloped. To address this barrier, non-tracer based MR lymphangiography is capable of visualizing lymphatic dilation and stasis in unilateral lymphedema, and similar features of lymphatic insufficiency are observed in the lower extremities of patients with lipedema.
This study will apply these MRI tools together with standard clinical tools to test the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1A: Ultrasound can be used as an accessible alternative to MRI for measuring subcutaneous fat deposition to distinguish lipedema from obesity.
Hypothesis 1B: Ultrasound measurement of fat deposition together with bedside tools for measuring water deposition have improved ability than ultrasound alone for distinguishing lipedema from controls.
Hypothesis 2: Tissue sodium is reduced following CDT in the lower extremities, but not in the untreated upper extremities, of patients with lipedema consistent with improved patient-reported outcomes.
Hypothesis 3: Lymphatic flow velocity is reduced, while arterial blood flow is elevated, in the legs of patients with lipedema compared to controls.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Participants pre CDT
* Participants with lipedema
* Biologically Female
* Age range = 18-80 years
* BMI range = 18 to 40 kg/m2
* BMI range = 18 to 40 kg/m2
No interventions assigned to this group
Controls
* Participants without lipedema
* Biologically Female
* Age range = 18-80 years
* BMI range = 18 to 40 kg/m2
No interventions assigned to this group
Participants post CDT
* Participants with lipedema
* Biologically Female
* Age range = 18-80 years
* BMI range = 18 to 40 kg/m2
* BMI range = 18 to 40 kg/m2
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Biologically Female
* Age range = 18-80 years
* BMI range = 18 to 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindication to 3T MRI
* Pregnant
* Severe claustrophobia
* Inability to provide written, informed consent
* Active infection anywhere in the body, or open wound on the lower-extremities or at locations for measurement
Also excluded are subjects incapable of giving informed written consent:
* Subjects who have an inability to communicate with the researcher for any reason
* Subjects who are non-English speaking who cannot communicate through a translator, or if a translator is not available
* Subjects who cannot adhere to the experimental protocols for any reason
* Subjects who have limited mental ability to give informed consent due to mental disability, confusion, or psychiatric disorders
* Prisoners
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
NIH
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rachelle Crescenzi
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rachelle Crescenzi, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
210181
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
302197
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.