The Role of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Primary Penile Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT05447273
Last Updated: 2024-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-15
2030-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
OSS may improve not only quality of life, but also quality of sexual function. However, there is a potential for increased risk of local recurrence after OSS compared to the amputation of the penis. Appropriate preoperative staging, including multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), can substantially improve selection of patients and decrease the recurrence rate after surgery.
MpMRI without artificial erection is promising diagnostic tool that is poised to be all-in-one solution for staging and preoperative assessment of primary penile cancer, especially prior to OSS. The method is non-invasive and thus comfortable to perform for most of the patients. Novel MRI techniques are not incorporated into current clinical recommendations, and the potential of new, functional sequences has not been evaluated before. The accuracy of functional, non-erectile mpMRI for detecting and staging of primary penile cancer is not known. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of this method for preoperative assessment of penile cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pre-operative PET-MR of High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients for Assessment of Cancer Aggressiveness and Lymph Node Status
NCT02076503
Preoperative Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging of Prostate Cancer
NCT01347320
MR Fingerprinting for Diagnostic of Prostate Cancer
NCT05498623
Image Guided Penile Cancer Surgery
NCT05376202
Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of FDHT-PET and Liquid Biopsies in Prostate Cancer
NCT05245435
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.
Multi-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Multi-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be performed in all included patients prior to surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multi-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Multi-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be performed in all included patients prior to surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the patient will benefit from organ-sparing surgery (OSS)
* signed broad consent for cancer research
Exclusion Criteria
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oslo University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marta Daniela Switlyk
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marta D Switlyk, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oslo University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hanchanale V, Yeo L, Subedi N, Smith J, Wah T, Harnden P, Bhattarai S, Chilka S, Eardley I. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the invasion of the tunica albuginea and the urethra during the primary staging of penile cancer. BJU Int. 2016 Mar;117(3):439-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.13041. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Cubilla AL, Barreto J, Caballero C, Ayala G, Riveros M. Pathologic features of epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. A prospective study of 66 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Aug;17(8):753-63. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199308000-00001.
Kayes O, Minhas S, Allen C, Hare C, Freeman A, Ralph D. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of penile cancer. Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1313-8; discussion 1318-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.014. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
Philippou P, Shabbir M, Malone P, Nigam R, Muneer A, Ralph DJ, Minhas S. Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control. J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Kieffer JM, Djajadiningrat RS, van Muilekom EA, Graafland NM, Horenblas S, Aaronson NK. Quality of life for patients treated for penile cancer. J Urol. 2014 Oct;192(4):1105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, Garcia CR, Fernandes Rde C, Perez MD. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1292-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.081.
Veeratterapillay R, Teo L, Asterling S, Greene D. Oncologic Outcomes of Penile Cancer Treatment at a UK Supraregional Center. Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1097-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.048. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Petralia G, Villa G, Scardino E, Zoffoli E, Renne G, de Cobelli O, Bellomi M. Local staging of penile cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with pharmacologically induced penile erection. Radiol Med. 2008 Jun;113(4):517-28. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0273-6. Epub 2008 May 13. English, Italian.
Scardino E, Villa G, Bonomo G, Matei DV, Verweij F, Rocco B, Varela R, de Cobelli O. Magnetic resonance imaging combined with artificial erection for local staging of penile cancer. Urology. 2004 Jun;63(6):1158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.008.
Krishna S, Shanbhogue K, Schieda N, Morbeck F, Hadas B, Kulkarni G, McInnes MD, Baroni RH. Role of MRI in Staging of Penile Cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;51(6):1612-1629. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27060. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
428797
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.