Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
RECRUITING
Total Enrollment
400 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2021-12-22
Study Completion Date
2026-08-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Prior to treatment, it is essential to assess not only the extent of prostate cancer within the prostate, but also to determine whether the disease has initiated metastatic spread. Whole-body MRI has become a viable option for the detection of metastatic disease derived from a number of cancers, but is typically performed in a separate scanning session to an initial dedicated prostate MRI in which the local disease is assessed. In patients known to be at high risk for significant prostate cancer prior to this initial MRI, and thus highly likely to proceed to treatment, this delays arriving at a definitive treatment decision. The investigators will evaluate the sensitivity of a protocol that combines bi-parametric prostate MRI, performed according to PI-RADS v2.1 guidelines, with a whole-body MRI based on the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) guidelines, for an All-in-One, local and systemic staging of intermediate-favorable or high risk prostate cancer patients. The resulting staging decisions will be compared to the results of systemic staging with those obtained by computed tomography and bone scintigraphy in the standard staging pathway.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a Response Biomarker for Metastatic Prostate Cancer
NCT05078151
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
UNKNOWN
NA
Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Locate and Characterize Prostate Cancer
NCT00082147
Prostate Cancer
COMPLETED
NA
Assessment of ADC Values and Radiomics Characteristics With a MRI of the Prostate to Identify Tumor Lesions
NCT06774781
Prostate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma)
RECRUITING
Response Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer to the Bone
NCT06321679
Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
RECRUITING
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Primary Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostatic Cancer in Men Newly Diagnosed
NCT04462926
Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasm
Urogenital Neoplasms
+3 more
UNKNOWN
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Accurate tumor staging for unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients should underpin both prognostication and management decisions. This void necessitates evaluation of the local, primary disease as well as spread to distant sites including lymph nodes and possible distant metastases.
Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) has become the reference standard practice for local imaging-based assessment in prostate cancer (PCa). Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is seeing growing for detection of distant, metastatic disease, and is particularly suited to detection of bone metastases, which are common in PCa. The possibility of a one-stop staging modality has been raised, wherein mp-MRI + whole body MRI (WB-MRI) would be used to further assess nodal and metastatic disease status in a single sitting. Currently however, international guidelines consider bone scintigraphy (BS) and pelvic computed tomography (CT) for distant disease to be the mainstays of imaging-based staging decisions. A further concern with transitioning to All-in-One prostate staging with MRI relates to the duration of scanning required, as an excessive scan duration is likely to lead to patient discomfort, motion and consequently reduce image quality.
The prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2.1 standard published by Turkbey et al. provides guidelines for mp-MRI of the prostate that are widely used as the basis for assessment of local, primary PCa. Recent evidence suggests that some components of the PI-RADS mp-MRI protocol are of little or no benefit to men with a very high risk of aggressive PCa, defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥10 ng/mL and + digital rectal exam, even before initial biopsy or repeated biopsy. In particular, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging and T2-weighted images (T2WI) in a third orthogonal plane does not improve the overall accuracy of mp-MRI. Therefore, biparametric MRI (bp-MRI; i.e. T2WI in two planes, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, without contrast agent injection)) has been suggested to reduce examination time and cost, while retaining sufficient diagnostic accuracy to "rule out" high-grade PCa in biopsy-naïve men.
WB-MRI offers greater sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for bone and nodal disease than BS and conventional CT. Further, a meta-analysis by Woo et al. has shown MRI (DWI + conventional sequences) to have excellent sensitivity and specificity in particular for detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. The pooled per-patient sensitivity and specificity of MRI in the 10 studies included in the meta-analysis were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-0.99), respectively. Similar performance for WB-MRI is reported in the meta-analysis of Shen et al. who found the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI to be similar to that of choline PET/CT, with both being superior to BS in the detection of bone metastases. The pooled sensitivities and specificities in this meta-analysis were 0.97/0.95 and 0.79/0.82 for WB-MRI and BS respectively. WB-MRI appears to be more accurate than conventional CT, which not surprising the pooled sensitivities and specificities of CT alone have been reported as 0.42 and 0.82 in a pair of meta-analyses . A recent work by Johnston et al., found that a WB-MRI protocol consisting of unenhanced T1-weighted DIXON and diffusion-weighted scans provides much higher diagnostic accuracy than BS (sensitivity/specificity 0.90/0.88 vs 0.60/1.00) for the primary staging of intermediate- and high-risk PCa. They also found high and very similar sensitivities/specificities for WB-MRI and BS in respect to nodal disease, with values of 1.00/0.96 and 1.00/0.82 for N1 disease and 0.75/ 0.93 and 0.75/0.92 for M1a disease respectively.
The investigators are continuing their studies into the role and the added value of WB-MRI in oncologic patients with advanced cancer (prostate, breast, melanoma\], lymphoma).
The investigators propose to evaluate the sensitivity of a protocol that combines bp-MRI of the prostate, following the PI-RADS v2.1 guideline, with WB-MRI based on MET-RADS-P guidelines, for an All-in-One, local and systemic staging of unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients and to compare the results of systemic staging with those obtained with CT and BS in the standard staging pathway. The combination of bp-MRI and WB-MRI is expected to require a scan time of roughly 40 minutes, allowing it to be performed in a conventional mp-MRI scan time allotment.
Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) has become the reference standard practice for local imaging-based assessment in prostate cancer (PCa). Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is seeing growing for detection of distant, metastatic disease, and is particularly suited to detection of bone metastases, which are common in PCa. The possibility of a one-stop staging modality has been raised, wherein mp-MRI + whole body MRI (WB-MRI) would be used to further assess nodal and metastatic disease status in a single sitting. Currently however, international guidelines consider bone scintigraphy (BS) and pelvic computed tomography (CT) for distant disease to be the mainstays of imaging-based staging decisions. A further concern with transitioning to All-in-One prostate staging with MRI relates to the duration of scanning required, as an excessive scan duration is likely to lead to patient discomfort, motion and consequently reduce image quality.
The prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2.1 standard published by Turkbey et al. provides guidelines for mp-MRI of the prostate that are widely used as the basis for assessment of local, primary PCa. Recent evidence suggests that some components of the PI-RADS mp-MRI protocol are of little or no benefit to men with a very high risk of aggressive PCa, defined as prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥10 ng/mL and + digital rectal exam, even before initial biopsy or repeated biopsy. In particular, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging and T2-weighted images (T2WI) in a third orthogonal plane does not improve the overall accuracy of mp-MRI. Therefore, biparametric MRI (bp-MRI; i.e. T2WI in two planes, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, without contrast agent injection)) has been suggested to reduce examination time and cost, while retaining sufficient diagnostic accuracy to "rule out" high-grade PCa in biopsy-naïve men.
WB-MRI offers greater sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for bone and nodal disease than BS and conventional CT. Further, a meta-analysis by Woo et al. has shown MRI (DWI + conventional sequences) to have excellent sensitivity and specificity in particular for detection of bone metastases in patients with PCa. The pooled per-patient sensitivity and specificity of MRI in the 10 studies included in the meta-analysis were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-0.99), respectively. Similar performance for WB-MRI is reported in the meta-analysis of Shen et al. who found the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI to be similar to that of choline PET/CT, with both being superior to BS in the detection of bone metastases. The pooled sensitivities and specificities in this meta-analysis were 0.97/0.95 and 0.79/0.82 for WB-MRI and BS respectively. WB-MRI appears to be more accurate than conventional CT, which not surprising the pooled sensitivities and specificities of CT alone have been reported as 0.42 and 0.82 in a pair of meta-analyses . A recent work by Johnston et al., found that a WB-MRI protocol consisting of unenhanced T1-weighted DIXON and diffusion-weighted scans provides much higher diagnostic accuracy than BS (sensitivity/specificity 0.90/0.88 vs 0.60/1.00) for the primary staging of intermediate- and high-risk PCa. They also found high and very similar sensitivities/specificities for WB-MRI and BS in respect to nodal disease, with values of 1.00/0.96 and 1.00/0.82 for N1 disease and 0.75/ 0.93 and 0.75/0.92 for M1a disease respectively.
The investigators are continuing their studies into the role and the added value of WB-MRI in oncologic patients with advanced cancer (prostate, breast, melanoma\], lymphoma).
The investigators propose to evaluate the sensitivity of a protocol that combines bp-MRI of the prostate, following the PI-RADS v2.1 guideline, with WB-MRI based on MET-RADS-P guidelines, for an All-in-One, local and systemic staging of unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients and to compare the results of systemic staging with those obtained with CT and BS in the standard staging pathway. The combination of bp-MRI and WB-MRI is expected to require a scan time of roughly 40 minutes, allowing it to be performed in a conventional mp-MRI scan time allotment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Prostate Cancer
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prostate Cancer Patients
Patients will undergo a combined whole-body MRI + multiparametric prostate MRI examination along with routine staging examinations (PET, CT / bone scintigraphy).
Reporting will be performed without and with reference to the whole-body MRI examination. Differences in the resulting staging and in management recommendations based on the two reportings will be recorded.
Prostate Cancer Patients
Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
see arm/group description
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prostate Cancer Patients
see arm/group description
Intervention Type
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* at least one of: International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥ 3 (Gleason Score ≥ 4+3); cT3 initial diagnosis with any PSA level; PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL with any Gleason score;
* and all the following: Signed informed consent; Patients eligible to active treatment (either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) and/or hormone therapy; Life expectancy ≥ 10 years;
* and all the following: Signed informed consent; Patients eligible to active treatment (either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) and/or hormone therapy; Life expectancy ≥ 10 years;
Exclusion Criteria
* Contraindications to MRI (e.g. severe claustrophobia or MRI unsafe device);
* Previous or ongoing hormone therapy or radiation therapy for prostate cancer;
* Significant intercurrent morbidity that, in the judgment of the investigator, would limit compliance with study protocols;
* Previous mp-MRI performed within six weeks of the outpatient visit and compliant with PI-RADS v2.1 guidelines;
* Prostate cancer with significant sarcomatoid or spindle cell or neuroendocrine small cell components;
* Previous or ongoing hormone therapy or radiation therapy for prostate cancer;
* Significant intercurrent morbidity that, in the judgment of the investigator, would limit compliance with study protocols;
* Previous mp-MRI performed within six weeks of the outpatient visit and compliant with PI-RADS v2.1 guidelines;
* Prostate cancer with significant sarcomatoid or spindle cell or neuroendocrine small cell components;
Minimum Eligible Age
35 Years
Eligible Sex
MALE
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
European Institute of Oncology
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Petralia, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
European Institute of Oncology, IEO IRCCS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, BS, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
Milan, MI, Italy
Site Status
RECRUITING
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Ospedale Borgo Roma
Verona, VR, Italy
Site Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Italy
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Luigi Grazioli, MD
Role: backup
Giuseppe Petralia, MD
Role: backup
Mirko Onofrio, MD
Role: backup
Nicolò Cardobi, MD
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bjurlin MA, Rosenkrantz AB, Beltran LS, Raad RA, Taneja SS. Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Nov;12(11):617-28. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.242. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pasoglou V, Larbi A, Collette L, Annet L, Jamar F, Machiels JP, Michoux N, Vande Berg BC, Tombal B, Lecouvet FE. One-step TNM staging of high-risk prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): toward an upfront simplified "all-in-one" imaging approach? Prostate. 2014 May;74(5):469-77. doi: 10.1002/pros.22764. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Morote J, Celma A, Roche S, de Torres IM, Mast R, Semedey ME, Regis L, Planas J. Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer? Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;2(6):664-669. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH, Moon MH. Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Nov;211(5):W226-W241. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19880. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Choi MH, Kim CK, Lee YJ, Jung SE. Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):839-846. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20498. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Obmann VC, Pahwa S, Tabayayong W, Jiang Y, O'Connor G, Dastmalchian S, Lu J, Shah S, Herrmann KA, Paspulati R, MacLennan G, Ponsky L, Abouassaly R, Gulani V. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Biparametric MRI Protocol for Detection of Histologically Proven Prostate Cancer. Urology. 2018 Dec;122:133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Boesen L, Norgaard N, Logager V, Balslev I, Bisbjerg R, Thestrup KC, Winther MD, Jakobsen H, Thomsen HS. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0219.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Niu XK, Chen XH, Chen ZF, Chen L, Li J, Peng T. Diagnostic Performance of Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):369-378. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18946. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lecouvet FE, El Mouedden J, Collette L, Coche E, Danse E, Jamar F, Machiels JP, Vande Berg B, Omoumi P, Tombal B. Can whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging replace Tc 99m bone scanning and computed tomography for single-step detection of metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer? Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z. Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Nov;43(11):1503-13. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1903-9. Epub 2014 May 20.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hovels AM, Heesakkers RA, Adang EM, Jager GJ, Strum S, Hoogeveen YL, Severens JL, Barentsz JO. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2008 Apr;63(4):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Evangelista L, Guttilla A, Zattoni F, Muzzio PC, Zattoni F. Utility of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for lymph node involvement identification in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2013 Jun;63(6):1040-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.039. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Johnston EW, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu HS, Ramachandran N, Sokolska M, Bainbridge A, Moore C, Ahmed HU, Punwani S. Multiparametric whole-body 3.0-T MRI in newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement for nodal and metastatic staging. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun;29(6):3159-3169. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5813-4. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Padhani AR, Lecouvet FE, Tunariu N, Koh DM, De Keyzer F, Collins DJ, Sala E, Schlemmer HP, Petralia G, Vargas HA, Fanti S, Tombal HB, de Bono J. METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer: Practical Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Evaluations of Multiorgan Involvement in Advanced Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pricolo P, Ancona E, Summers P, Abreu-Gomez J, Alessi S, Jereczek-Fossa BA, De Cobelli O, Nole F, Renne G, Bellomi M, Padhani AR, Petralia G. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) reporting with the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P): inter-observer agreement between readers of different expertise levels. Cancer Imaging. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00350-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zugni F, Ruju F, Pricolo P, Alessi S, Iorfida M, Colleoni MA, Bellomi M, Petralia G. The added value of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with advanced breast cancer. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 12;13(10):e0205251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205251. eCollection 2018.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Petralia G, Padhani A, Summers P, Alessi S, Raimondi S, Testori A, Bellomi M. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging: is it all we need for detecting metastases in melanoma patients? Eur Radiol. 2013 Dec;23(12):3466-76. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2968-x. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Montoro J, Laszlo D, Zing NP, Petralia G, Conte G, Colandrea M, Martinelli G, Preda L. Comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance and FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of Hodgkin's lymphoma for staging and treatment response. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014 May 15;8:429. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2014.429. eCollection 2014.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IEO 1537
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate to Assess Disease Progression and Genomics in Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
NCT04692675
RECRUITING
NA
Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to Guide Differential-Dose Prostate Brachytherapy
NCT01913197
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
Novel Imaging in Staging of Primary Prostate Cancer
NCT03537391
COMPLETED
NA
Diagnostic Value of MRI-targeted Plus Index-lesion-ipsilaterally Systematic Biopsy for Biopsy-naive Men At Risk of Prostate Cancer
NCT06584279
RECRUITING
Diagnostic Imaging of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT03134261
UNKNOWN
NA
Biparametric MRI for Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer
NCT02584179
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of Modern MRI in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in a Danish Setup
NCT01640262
COMPLETED
Multiparametric MRI in Men With Prostate Cancer Enrolled in Active Surveillance
NCT03648359
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
Defining the Extent and Grade of Prostate Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Diffusion Weighted and BOLD MRI
NCT00242112
COMPLETED
NA
Novel MRI Assessment of Prostate Cancer VALIDATE-PRO
NCT05017181
UNKNOWN
Multiparametric MRI in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance
NCT02526797
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Detection Rate of Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing MRI
NCT04398173
COMPLETED
MRI for Assessment of Hypoxia-Induced Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness
NCT01464216
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
An AI Platform Integrating Imaging Data and Models, Supporting Precision Care Through Prostate Cancer's Continuum
NCT05384002
COMPLETED
MRI in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer
NCT01292291
UNKNOWN
NA
Quantitative mpMRI to Predict Metastatic Potential of Prostate Cancer
NCT05252806
UNKNOWN
Imaging of High Grade Prostate Cancer
NCT02177526
TERMINATED
NA
Magnetic Resonance Whole Body Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Finding Bone or Lymph Node Metastasis in Participants With High-Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT03085043
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Targeted And Perilesional Or Systematic Biopsy In Prostate Cancer
NCT07296042
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Prostate Cancer Screening Trial Using Imaging
NCT03702439
COMPLETED
Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Staging Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT02237612
COMPLETED
NA
Prostate Cancer Localization With a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (MR) Approach
NCT01138527
COMPLETED
A Phase 2 Study With MIP-1404 in Men With High-Risk PC Scheduled for RP and EPLND Compared to Histopathology
NCT01667536
COMPLETED
PHASE2
PET/MRI to Stage Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT06484361
RECRUITING
PHASE2