In Vivo Cortical Excitability Modulation in Major Depressive Disorder
NCT ID: NCT05441969
Last Updated: 2025-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
90 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-05-19
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cortical Excitability and Inhibition in MDD
NCT01718730
Investigation of Brain Network Dynamics in Depression
NCT01931995
Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Role of Frontostriatal Circuit in Major Depressive Disorder
NCT05212636
Effects of Intravenous (IV) Citalopram Hydrochloride During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
NCT04846829
Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depressed Patients
NCT02213016
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to evaluate differences in the modulation of cortical excitability by a repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) protocol between patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and healthy people. The investigators hypothesize that patients with MDD exhibit less modulation of cortical excitability when compared to healthy people.
In order to accomplish this goal the investigators will:
* Compare measures of cortical excitability between patients with MDD and healthy individuals;
* Compare the degree of modulation of cortical excitability in motor cortex after the application of rTMS, between healthy individuals and patients with MDD;
* Study the progression/evolution of these measures in the group of patients with MDD after 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment, while comparing patients that respond to treatment with patients with symptoms resistant to treatment;
* Analyze the relationship between cortical excitability measures and cortical excitability modulation. Study participants will perform a psychophysical task, on a computer game, in order to evaluate certain cognitive processes and understand if there are differences in performance between patients with depression and healthy subjects.
Data Collection
* Clinical assessment: Clinical interview will be performed with help of psychiatric, psychological and cognitive psychometric instruments (self-report questionnaires and structured interviews) to assess the participants' health.
* Behavioural assessment: Participants will perform a psychophysical task in the form of a computer game.
* Neurophysiological evaluation: protocol for assessing excitability and excitability modulation of the motor cortex by EMT and EMTr (ETBi).
Procedures
The participants recruited for the present project will be patients who are already being treated by health professionals at the Champalimaud Clinical Center, as well as healthy individuals, recruited from the nearby community. One cohort will include patients with active/symptomatic MDD and a second cohort will include patients with MDD in remission that are still in treatment. The third cohort will include a control group of healthy individuals. After they are referred to participate in this study, and if consent to participate is collected, they will be assessed to confirm their eligibility and group allocation will be performed. The study participants from all three observational groups will be submitted to (1) full clinical information assessment, (2) will be asked to perform a psychophysical task, i.e. a computer game. Finally, (3) the neurophysiological evaluation protocol will be applied. This neurophysiological evaluation protocol will be performed in two visits separated by at least 48h. This will make it possible to assess cortical excitability measures in both hemispheres independently and safely, allowing the acquisition of interhemispheric asymmetry measures. The order in which the cerebral hemispheres will be assessed will be randomized between participants. The first visit should take no longer than 120 minutes, and the second will last less than 45 minutes. Participants in the study will also be asked to come for a second study visit, to the Champalimaud Clinical Center, approximately 6 weeks after the first visit, the same study protocol will be repeated, in two consecutive sessions with the same procedures.Participants will not be rewarded monetarily; they will be supported for travel to the Clinical Center that may be necessary outside their individual clinical follow-up
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Current major depressive episode group
Adult individuals (18-65 yrs) diagnosed with current major depressive episode (MDE), under treatment or medication naif, starting a new antidperessant strategy (n≈30).
No intervention/expousure
No interventions/expousure since this is an observational study.
Maintenance antidepressant treatment group
Adult individuals (18-65 yrs) previously diagnosed with major depressive episode (MDE) currently remitted under continuation or maintenance antidepressant treatment (n≈30).
No intervention/expousure
No interventions/expousure since this is an observational study.
Healthy subjects group
Adult individuals (18-65 yrs) without current diagnosis of major neuropsychiatric disorders, inlcluding MDE, hence not under any antidepressant medication. The same exclusion criteria will be applied as in the two clincial groups.
No intervention/expousure
No interventions/expousure since this is an observational study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention/expousure
No interventions/expousure since this is an observational study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known personal history of bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder;
3. Alcohol or other substance abuse and/or dependence;
4. Developmental disorder;
5. Dementia;
6. Presence of uncontrolled active medical illness;
7. Known structural lesion of the central nervous system;
8. Electrical or metallic brain implants;
9. Cardiac implants;
10. Epilepsy;
11. Active use of medication known to cause seizures;
12. Pregnancy;
13. Breastfeeding.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundacao Champalimaud
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Albino Maia
Director of Neuropsychiatry Unit, Champalimaud Foundation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Albino J Oliveira-Maia, MD, MPH, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Champalimaud Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Champalimaud Foundation
Lisbon, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benussi A, Di Lorenzo F, Dell'Era V, Cosseddu M, Alberici A, Caratozzolo S, Cotelli MS, Micheli A, Rozzini L, Depari A, Flammini A, Ponzo V, Martorana A, Caltagirone C, Padovani A, Koch G, Borroni B. Transcranial magnetic stimulation distinguishes Alzheimer disease from frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2017 Aug 15;89(7):665-672. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004232. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Blumberger DM, Vila-Rodriguez F, Thorpe KE, Feffer K, Noda Y, Giacobbe P, Knyahnytska Y, Kennedy SH, Lam RW, Daskalakis ZJ, Downar J. Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
Chang WH, Fried PJ, Saxena S, Jannati A, Gomes-Osman J, Kim YH, Pascual-Leone A. Optimal number of pulses as outcome measures of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug;127(8):2892-2897. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Chung SW, Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Apr;63:43-64. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, Borgheresi A, Balestrieri F, Toscani L, Zaccara G, Carducci F, Viggiano MP, Rossi S. Optically tracked neuronavigation increases the stability of hand-held focal coil positioning: evidence from "transcranial" magnetic stimulation-induced electrical field measurements. Brain Stimul. 2010 Apr;3(2):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
Concerto C, Lanza G, Cantone M, Pennisi M, Giordano D, Spampinato C, Ricceri R, Pennisi G, Aguglia E, Bella R. Different patterns of cortical excitability in major depression and vascular depression: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 9;13:300. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-300.
Daskalakis ZJ, Farzan F, Barr MS, Maller JJ, Chen R, Fitzgerald PB. Long-interval cortical inhibition from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS-EEG study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Nov;33(12):2860-9. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.22. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
Fitzgerald, Paul B., and Z. Jeff Daskalakis. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Depressive Disorders: A Practical Guide. Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
Fried PJ, Jannati A, Davila-Perez P, Pascual-Leone A. Reproducibility of Single-Pulse, Paired-Pulse, and Intermittent Theta-Burst TMS Measures in Healthy Aging, Type-2 Diabetes, and Alzheimer's Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Aug 21;9:263. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00263. eCollection 2017.
Goldsworthy MR, Hordacre B, Ridding MC. Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability. Neuroscience. 2016 Apr 21;320:205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
Huang YZ, Rothwell JC. The effect of short-duration bursts of high-frequency, low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 May;115(5):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.026.
Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033.
Jahanshahi M, Ridding MC, Limousin P, Profice P, Fogel W, Dressler D, Fuller R, Brown RG, Brown P, Rothwell JC. Rapid rate transcranial magnetic stimulation--a safety study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Dec;105(6):422-9. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00057-x.
Julkunen P, Saisanen L, Danner N, Niskanen E, Hukkanen T, Mervaala E, Kononen M. Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials. Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.040. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS; National Comorbidity Survey Replication. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095.
Kim DR, Epperson N, Pare E, Gonzalez JM, Parry S, Thase ME, Cristancho P, Sammel MD, O'Reardon JP. An open label pilot study of transcranial magnetic stimulation for pregnant women with major depressive disorder. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Feb;20(2):255-61. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2353.
Kupfer DJ, Frank E, Phillips ML. Major depressive disorder: new clinical, neurobiological, and treatment perspectives. Lancet. 2012 Mar 17;379(9820):1045-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60602-8. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
Leykin Y, Roberts CS, Derubeis RJ. Decision-Making and Depressive Symptomatology. Cognit Ther Res. 2011 Aug;35(4):333-341. doi: 10.1007/s10608-010-9308-0. Epub 2010 May 4.
Loo CK, McFarquhar TF, Mitchell PB. A review of the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a clinical treatment for depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Feb;11(1):131-47. doi: 10.1017/S1461145707007717. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
Machii K, Cohen D, Ramos-Estebanez C, Pascual-Leone A. Safety of rTMS to non-motor cortical areas in healthy participants and patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):455-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.10.014. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
Maeda F, Keenan JP, Pascual-Leone A. Interhemispheric asymmetry of motor cortical excitability in major depression as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;177:169-73. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.2.169.
Oberman L, Edwards D, Eldaief M, Pascual-Leone A. Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;28(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318205135f.
Oliveira-Maia AJ, Press D, Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2017 Jul-Aug;10(4):787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Player MJ, Taylor JL, Weickert CS, Alonzo A, Sachdev P, Martin D, Mitchell PB, Loo CK. Neuroplasticity in depressed individuals compared with healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Oct;38(11):2101-8. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.126. Epub 2013 May 16.
Radhu, Natasha, Daniel M. Blumberger, and Zafiris J. Daskalakis. "Cortical Inhibition and Excitation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation." In Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, edited by André Brunoni, Michael Nitsche, and Colleen Loo, 85-102. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33967-2_6.
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Schrader LM, Stern JM, Koski L, Nuwer MR, Engel J Jr. Seizure incidence during single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals with epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;115(12):2728-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.018.
Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, Hergueta T, Baker R, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57.
Siebner HR, Hartwigsen G, Kassuba T, Rothwell JC. How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition. Cortex. 2009 Oct;45(9):1035-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
Vignaud P, Damasceno C, Poulet E, Brunelin J. Impaired Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability in Drug-Free Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Theta-Burst Stimulation Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Feb 26;13:72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00072. eCollection 2019.
Wainwright SR, Galea LA. The neural plasticity theory of depression: assessing the roles of adult neurogenesis and PSA-NCAM within the hippocampus. Neural Plast. 2013;2013:805497. doi: 10.1155/2013/805497. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
Wassermann EM. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PDM-TMS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.