Remote Glucose Monitoring System in Hospitalized Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)
NCT ID: NCT05439928
Last Updated: 2025-05-14
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
163 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-07
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dexcom G6 Intervention Study
NCT03877068
Continuous Glucose Monitoring of Hospitalized Patients With Diabetes
NCT04230694
The Performance of Dexcom G6 Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
NCT05255783
Dexcom Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Long-term Care
NCT04818242
Dexcom G6 Observational Study
NCT03832907
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Once the number of COVID cases decreased and ICU beds were more readily available, the hospital returned to practicing pre-COVID standard of care, which was admitting DKA patient to the ICU for hourly glucose monitoring.
This study is a combined retrospective and prospective study of DKA patients. The investigators propose a retrospective chart review of DKA patients who had glucose levels monitored with DEXCOM G6 CGM during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the prospective portion of this study, participants will be enrolled and will undergo continuous glucose monitoring with DEXCOM G6 instead of the hourly fingerstick point of care glucose testing. Data collected for participants monitored via DEXCOM G6 (retrospective and prospective study data combined analysis) will be compared to participants with glucose levels monitored via hourly fingerstick in the ICU setting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DEXCOM G6 CGM
Continuous glucose monitoring by DEXCOM G6 (glucose monitoring device) in a step-down unit in participants with DKA. This group comprises of both retrospective chart review and prospective patients.
DEXCOM G6 CGM
Continuous glucose monitoring
Hourly Finger Stick Point of Care (Historical Control)
DKA patients that received hourly glucose monitoring by finger stick while triaged through the ICU
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DEXCOM G6 CGM
Continuous glucose monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* AG\>20 mEq/L
* Bicarbonate \<15mEq/L
* Positive urine ketones or beta hydroxybutyrate \>0.3 mmol/L
Exclusion Criteria
* Requirement for pressor therapy
* Contraindication for utilizing Dexcom CGM
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
DexCom, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Magdalena M. Bogun, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Magdalena Bogun, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Columbia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New York Presbyterian Hospital/ Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Sep;12(9):679-84. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0015.
Nair BG, Dellinger EP, Flum DR, Rooke GA, Hirsch IB. A Pilot Study of the Feasibility and Accuracy of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):e168-e169. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0670. Epub 2020 May 11. No abstract available.
Pasquel FJ, Umpierrez GE. Individualizing Inpatient Diabetes Management During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Jul;14(4):705-707. doi: 10.1177/1932296820923045. Epub 2020 May 5.
Chow KW, Kelly DJ, Rieff MC, Skala PA, Kravets I, Charitou MM, Morley EJ, Gupta R, Miller JD. Outcomes and Healthcare Provider Perceptions of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (rtCGM) in Patients With Diabetes and COVID-19 Admitted to the ICU. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 May;15(3):607-614. doi: 10.1177/1932296820985263. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Davis GM, Galindo RJ, Migdal AL, Umpierrez GE. Diabetes Technology in the Inpatient Setting for Management of Hyperglycemia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;49(1):79-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2019.11.002.
Umpierrez GE, Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital. Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1579-1589. doi: 10.2337/dci18-0002. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
Newton CA, Smiley D, Bode BW, Kitabchi AE, Davidson PC, Jacobs S, Steed RD, Stentz F, Peng L, Mulligan P, Freire AX, Temponi A, Umpierrez GE. A comparison study of continuous insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit: computer-guided vs. standard column-based algorithms. J Hosp Med. 2010 Oct;5(8):432-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.816.
Pal R, Banerjee M, Yadav U, Bhattacharjee S. Clinical profile and outcomes in COVID-19 patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: A systematic review of literature. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Nov-Dec;14(6):1563-1569. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
Li J, Wang X, Chen J, Zuo X, Zhang H, Deng A. COVID-19 infection may cause ketosis and ketoacidosis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Oct;22(10):1935-1941. doi: 10.1111/dom.14057. Epub 2020 May 18.
Fayfman M, Pasquel FJ, Umpierrez GE. Management of Hyperglycemic Crises: Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State. Med Clin North Am. 2017 May;101(3):587-606. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.12.011.
Livingston E, Desai A, Berkwits M. Sourcing Personal Protective Equipment During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1912-1914. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5317. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAT7802
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.