Ascitic Fluid Calprotectin as an Accurate Diagnostic Marker for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
NCT ID: NCT05422118
Last Updated: 2022-08-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-10
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
SBP is attributed to immune dysfunction, bacterial translocation, circulatory dysfunction and inflammatory status. SBP is diagnosed by ascitic fluid analysis . SBP was defined as polymorphonuclear leucocyte count (PMN) \>250/mm3 in ascitic fluid, . Not all cases are associated with positive ascitic fluid cultures.
There are variants of ascitic fluid infections as culture-negative neutrocytic ascites, monomicrobial non-neutrocytic bacterascites, polymicrobial bacterascites and secondary bacterial peritonitis.
The advent of the SBP carries a poor prognosis where the hospital mortality ranged from 10 to 50%. As a consequence, any patient with SBP should be assessed for liver transplantation. Immediate treatment with antibiotics and IV albumin should be initiated.
Studies were conducted on alternatives of the ascitic PMN count as high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), serum procalcitonin, urinary lipocalin, ascitic lactoferrin, homocysteine and fecal or ascitic calprotectin.
The gold standard test for SBP is ascitic fluid analysis with measurement of the PMN. It is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment. The culture of the ascitic fluid may be positive if was done correctly .
There is a variant of SBP that is called culture-negative neutrocytic ascites. It is characterized by elevated ascitic fluid PMN but the culture is negative. It is managed exactly as classic SBP. Such cases would be missed if cultures were not done The manual PMN counting is time consuming, laborious and required some experience to avoid intra- and inter-observer variability. So, a simple rapid bedside test would be useful clinically.
Calprotectin is acute-phase inflammatory protein that is released from the PMN. Calprotectin has anti-proliferative and antimicrobial properties. Calprotectin is used clinically widespread in the diagnosis and monitoring treatment of inflammatory bowel disease .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Calprotectin for Rapid Diagnostic Infection Spontaneous of Ascites
NCT02857101
Predictors of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Among Patients with Cirrhosis
NCT06884306
Sulfation of Bile Acids as a Biomarker for Hepatobiliary Diseases
NCT01200082
Hyperbilirubinemia in Acute Appendicitis as a Predictor of Perforation
NCT00528138
CMV Reactivation in Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
NCT05898048
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
case
people who have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
ascitic fluid calprotectin
ascitic fluid calprotectin
control
people who donot have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
ascitic fluid calprotectin
ascitic fluid calprotectin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ascitic fluid calprotectin
ascitic fluid calprotectin
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
The patients were divided into two groups:
1. Non-SBP group: it included 25 patients with cirrhotic ascites without clinical or laboratory evidence of SBP.
2. SBP group: it included 25 patients with cirrhotic ascites with SBP. They were diagnosed by positive ascitic fluid bacterial culture, an increase in PMNLs count in ascites (\>250 cells/mm3) and without any intra-abdominal source of infection.
Exclusion Criteria
(2) Recent abdominal surgery (\<3 months). (3) abdominal malignancy \[hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma\].
(4) Intra-abdominal infected lesions, such as abscess, appendicitis, cholecystitis, and pancreatitis.
(5) History of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis).
(6) patients with heart failure (HF), hematological, and autoimmune disorders were excluded.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alaa Saber Mohamed
resident doctor at clinical pathology department at faculty of medicine sohag university hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sohag University Hospital
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
laila M Yousef, professor
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Osama R Elshrif, professor
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Xiol X, Castellvi JM, Guardiola J, Sese E, Castellote J, Perello A, Cervantes X, Iborra MJ. Spontaneous bacterial empyema in cirrhotic patients: a prospective study. Hepatology. 1996 Apr;23(4):719-23. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230410.
Bernardi M. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: from pathophysiology to prevention. Intern Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;5 Suppl 1:S37-44. doi: 10.1007/s11739-010-0446-x.
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 Jun 1. No abstract available.
Marciano S, Diaz JM, Dirchwolf M, Gadano A. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis: incidence, outcomes, and treatment strategies. Hepat Med. 2019 Jan 14;11:13-22. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S164250. eCollection 2019.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-22-06-07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.