Sensitivity and Specificity of TSA-CBA for Autoantibodies Against Neural Antigen Determination

NCT ID: NCT05414890

Last Updated: 2022-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

2500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-30

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Determination of autoantibodies against fragments derived from neurons, glia, and myelin sheath is instrumental in aiding diagnosis, differential diagnosis, as well as determining disease status of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Cell based assay (CBA) has been frequently recommended to detect autoantibodies of neuroantigens in the aforementioned neurological disorders. However, antibodies with low abundance or low affinity often fall beyond the threshold of CBA and pose significant challenges in practice. To this end, the investigators adopted a tyramide signal amplification (TSA) technology with the basis of CBA to improve sensitivity. The preliminary results suggest that this TSA-CBA platform is superior to conventional CBA in registered signals of the titer autoantibodies. In elevating the sensitivity, TSA-CBA also preserves antigen confirmation. This prospective study is launched to compare the sensitivity, specificity, clinical correlation between CBA and CBA-TSA, in determining autoantibodies against aquaporin 4 (AQP4-IgG), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR-IgG) in a multicenter, double-blind setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants: The sera of patients with CNS demyelinating autoimmune diseases (NMOSD, MOGAD, AE).

Primary aim: 1) Compare the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation between CBA and CBA-TSA, in detecting AQP4, MOG, and NMDAR IgG. 2) Analyze the advantage of CBA-TSA assay over conventional CBA in detecting antibodies to AQP4, MOG, and NMDAR IgG with low abundance and low affinity.

Secondary aim: Comparison of the turn-around time and the cost of CBA and CBA-TSA in detecting AQP4, MOG, and NMDAR IgG.

Study design: Multicenter, double-blind, CBA and CBA-TSA methodology comparison

Total cases:

1. 1000 patients with suspected NMOSD, MOGAD and 1000 patients with suspected autoimmune encephalitis (AE) will be recruited.
2. 500 normal subjects will be recruited.

Trial Period: The trial recruiting duration is 1-2 years.

Research reagents: 1. The reagents for of AQP4, MOG or NMDAR IgG antibody detection via CBA have been developed and validated by the joint effort of Bejing Tiantan Hospital, Tianjin General Hospital, and Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd, China , will be adopted by this study. 2. The CBA-TSA antibody IgG assay developed by the three entities and will be adopted for this study

Groups: The sera samples from patients and control subjects, upon clinic visits, as well as during follow up, will be randomly numbered. All samples will be blindly tested with CBA-TSA and CBA by different operators.

Study Steps:

1. Patients recruiting: 1000 patients with suspected NMOSD, MOGAD and 1000 patients with suspected AE will be recruited according to inclusion/exclusion criteria.
2. CBA/CBA-TSA assay: Sera samples from patients and control subjects will be randomly numbered and divided into 3 equal parts (500 ul/part). All samples will be tested with CBA-TSA and CBA by different blinded operators; original value, control value, turn-around time and cost will all be recorded. The difference comparison between CBA and CBA-TSA was completed by Bejing Tiantan Hospital.
3. Statistical Methods: Each center will provide feedback of the clinical diagnosis and treatment data of the participants to the investigator. The investigator will complete the evaluation of respective clinical correlation of the CBA and CBA-TSA methods. The statistics and operation of the project are supervised by a third-party audit company.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

NMO Spectrum Disorder NMDA-R Encephalitis Diagnostic Self Evaluation Immune System Diseases Nervous System Diseases Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Autoimmune Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cell Based Assay (CBA)

The sera samples from patients and control subjects, upon clinic visits, as well as during follow up, will be randomly numbered. All samples will be blindly tested with CBA by different operators.

No interventions assigned to this group

CBA-TSA Assay

The sera samples from patients and control subjects, upon clinic visits, as well as during follow up, will be randomly numbered. All samples will be blindly tested with CBA-TSA by different operators.

CBA-TSA

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Compare the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation between CBA and CBA-TSA, in detecting AQP4, MOG, and NMDAR IgG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CBA-TSA

Compare the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation between CBA and CBA-TSA, in detecting AQP4, MOG, and NMDAR IgG

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patients with suspected NMOSD, MOGAD and AE will be recruited.
2. Male and female patients, ≥ 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Abnormal sera, such as hemolysis or lipemia, which will affect the final interpretation of CBA and CBA-TSA;
2. The samples with incomplete clinical data that would affect the disease characterization.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fu-Dong Shi

Role: CONTACT

+861059976585

Pei Zheng

Role: CONTACT

15522085943

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fu-Dong Shi, PhD

Role: primary

+861059976585

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhang C, Tian DC, Yang CS, Han B, Wang J, Yang L, Shi FD. Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib in Patients With Highly Relapsing Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. JAMA Neurol. 2017 Aug 1;74(8):1010-1012. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1336.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28692708 (View on PubMed)

Zhang C, Zhang M, Qiu W, Ma H, Zhang X, Zhu Z, Yang CS, Jia D, Zhang TX, Yuan M, Feng Y, Yang L, Lu W, Yu C, Bennett JL, Shi FD; TANGO Study Investigators. Safety and efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine in highly relapsing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (TANGO): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 May;19(5):391-401. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30070-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32333897 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB2022-YX-066-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Serum Auto-Antibodies in Neurological Diseases
NCT00704626 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION