The Specificity, Sensitivity and Clinical Correlation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA in Detecting AChR and MuSK IgG of Myasthenia Gravis

NCT ID: NCT05219097

Last Updated: 2023-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

2663 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorder mediated by autoantibodies against AChR, MuSK or other autoantigens located at the post synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Presence of autoantibodies specific for AChR or MuSK can establish diagnosis in conjunction with clinical presentations. In most established guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis, determination of AChR and MuSK antibodies has been recommended. Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and cell-based assay (CBA) are all commercially available and have been adopted for autoantibody detection by most referring neurologists. At present, specificity and sensitivity of these methods have not been compared in large cohorts within a context of stringent quality control. As a consequence, there are no national or international consensus regarding selection of methods and interpretation of results, resulting in challenges to neurologists managing these patients. To this end, the investigators proposed to conduct a multicenter, double-blind, prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CBA, RIPA and ELISA assays to detect AChR and MuSK antibodies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants: patients with suspected MG

Aim: the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation of AChR and MuSK IgG detection through the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA methods.

Study design: A multicenter, double-blind, prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of CBA, RIPA, and ELISA assays in detecting AChR and MuSK antibodies.

Total enrollment: 3000 patients with suspected MG will be enrolled.

Time frame: The enrollment time of this trial is 21 months, and the entire study period is about 24 months.

Reagent resource: 1. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody RIA kit: RSR limited, recommended cut-off value=0.5 nmol/L.

2\. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody CBA kit: Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd; recommended cut-off value =1:10.

3\. Acetylcholine receptor autoantibody ELISA kit: RSR limited; recommended cut-off value=0.45 nmol/L.

4\. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase RIA kit: RSR limited, recommended cut-off value =0.05 nmol/L.

5\. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase CBA kit: Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd; recommended cut-off value =1:10.

6\. Muscle-specific tyrosine kinase ELISA kit: IBL, recommended cut-off value=0.4 U/ml.

Groups: The samples were divided into 3 groups according to the detected methods: CBA group, RIPA group and ELISA group.

Study protocol: 1. When patients suspected of MG matched up with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the serum sample of each patient would be divided into equal aliquots and randomly assigned to the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA testing laboratories for detection.

2\. All patient's information will be masked and monitored by members of ethics committees. Serum specimens from participants will be renumbered without any clinical information before doing the tests to be investigated. According to the standard procedure of kits, the operator in laboratories to perform the CBA, ELISA, or RIPA will complete the detection of AChR and MuSK antibodies of the enrolled participants' serum, and record the original value, control, or reference value.

3\. Each MG center will provide the clinical diagnosis results of the enrolled patients, treatment and follow up information of the participants. The diagnosis of MG and the tests to be investigated will be double blindly done.

4\. The data statistics, analysis, and summary of the project are operated by an independent third-party statistic team.

Evaluation indicators: Evaluate the specificity, sensitivity, and clinical correlation of AChR and MuSK IgG detection through the CBA, ELISA, and RIPA methods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Detection Autoantibody of Myasthenia Gravis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cell Based Assay (CBA)

Use AChR/MuSK Ab CBA Kit (Tianjin New Terrain Biological Technology Co., Ltd, China) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis

CBA Assay

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis

RIPA Assay

Use AChR and MuSK Ab radioimmunoassay kit (RSR Limited, UK) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis

CBA Assay

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis

ELISA Assay

Use AChR Ab ELISA Kit (RSR Limited, UK) and MuSK ELISA kit (IBL Limited, Germany) to detect AChR and MuSK Ab of myasthenia gravis

CBA Assay

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CBA Assay

Comparsion of specificity, sensitivity and clinical correlation of CBA, ELISA and RIPA assay in autoantibodies detection of myasthenia gravis

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ELISA Assay RIPA Assay

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with compatible clinical features of weakness of skeletal muscles, including ptosis, diplopia, dysphonia, dysphagia, or limb weakness.
* Patients need to do the diagnosis of MG, requiring serum autoantibody, electrophysiological, pharmacological neostigmine test, thymic computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), etc in the diagnostic evaluation of MG.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with uncertain diagnoses or incomplete clinical data for data analysis.
* Patients with abnormal serum samples, such as hemolysis or lipemia, which will affect the detection base value and the final interpretation of CBA, RIPA and ELISA.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fu-Dong Shi

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fu-Dong Shi, MD, Ph.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Li Z, Zhang C, Chang T, Zhang X, Yang H, Gao F, Feng J, Liu H, Chen S, Wang L, Yang C, Li H, Pan Y, Palace J, Shi FD; SCREAM Study Investigators. A multicentre, prospective, double-blind study comparing the accuracy of autoantibody diagnostic assays in myasthenia gravis: the SCREAM study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jul 19;38:100846. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100846. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37554174 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB2021-YX-260-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.