Rituximab Versus Steroids and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy
NCT ID: NCT03018535
Last Updated: 2019-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The commonest presentation of IMN is nephrotic syndrome. Data from placebo arms of interventional studies show that 30-40% of the untreated patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome (NS) progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
The best-validated treatment regimen of IMN is combination therapy with steroids and cyclophosphamide, capable to induce remission of protenuria in two-third of the patients.
Despite this evidence of efficacy, there are concerns about the use of cyclophosphamide, since it may be associated with adverse events, including bone marrow suppression, gonadal toxicity, infections and oncogenic effects. Thus, the availability of alternative therapies highly effective but with a greater safety profile is desirable.
Given the key role of IgG antibodies in IMN, B cell depletion may favourably impact the glomerular disease. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab is a selective B cell depleting agent. There is evidence that Rituximab is effective in the treatment of other diseases in which B cells play a key role, such as ANCA-related vasculitis. Observational studies in IMN provided encouraging data; in addition, the drug seems well tolerated.
Head-to-head comparisons between Rituximab and steroid plus ciclophosphamide in randomized clinical trials are missing.
The investigators propose this study in order to test, in a randomized controlled trial, the hypothesis that Rituximab is more effective than cyclical steroid/alkylating-agent therapy in inducing remission in patients with IMN and NS undergoing the initial treatment. In addition, the levels of the above-mentioned pathogenetic autoantibodies will be measured at baseline and during treatment. Finally, the study will compare the safety profile of steroid plus cyclophosphamide and Rituximab by evaluating the rate and severity of adverse events
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MEmbranous Nephropathy Trial Of Rituximab
NCT01180036
Personalized Medicine for Membranous Nephropathy
NCT03804359
Rituximab Plus Cyclosporine in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy
NCT00977977
Personalized Rituximab Treatment Based on Artificial Intelligence in Membranous Nephropathy (iRITUX)
NCT06341205
Trial of Rituximab for Graves' Ophthalmopathy
NCT00595335
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Complete remission of nephrotic syndrome predicts excellent long-term kidney and patient survival, and partial remission also significantly reduces the risk of progression to ESRD. Therefore, persisting remission of the nephrotic state is an acceptable surrogate end-point to assess efficacy of treatment. The primary aims of treatment, therefore, are to induce a lasting reduction in proteinuria. The best-validated regimen is combination therapy with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide ("Ponticelli" regimen). This treatment is superior to supportive therapy alone in inducing remissions and preventing long-term decline of kidney function in patients with idiopathic MN and persisting nephrotic syndrome. However, there are concerns about the use of cyclophosphamide, since its use may be associated with adverse events, leading to treatment interruption in about 9% of patients. These adverse events include bone marrow suppression, gonadal toxicity, infections and oncogenic effects.
Thus, the availability of alternative therapies highly effective but with a greater safety profile is desirable.
Recent human studies confirmed that MN is an autoimmune disease, suggesting that the disease may be triggered by isotype specific autoantibodies directed against podocyte enzymes and podocyte receptors that are recognized as antigens, including M-type phospholipase-2 receptors(PLA2R1) and thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A). The podocyte expression of these autoantigens can trigger the production of specific antibodies and in situ deposits of immune complexes, with consequent activation of complement cascade, oxygen radicals, and other inflammatory pathways leading to tissue injury and fibrosis. Additional autoantibodies, directed to podocyte neo-expressed cytoplasm proteins have been described, including aldose reductase (AR), Mn-superoxide dismutase (SOD2) and alpha-enolase (alpha-ENO).
However, the mechanisms eliciting the expression of these neoantigens on podocytes and regulating the deposition of the auto-antibodies on the subepithelial surface of the glomerular basement membrane is not known.
Considering the potential role of IgG antibodies in the pathogenesis of IMN, B cell depletion may favourably impact the glomerular disease as reflected by a reduction in proteinuria. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab is a selective B cell depleting agent, capable to maintain B cells undetectable for 3-12 months. There is evidence that this strategy is effective in the treatment of other diseases in which B cells play a key role, such as ANCA-related vasculitis and humoral allograft rejection. Preliminary studies in IMN are promising, with observational studies providing encouraging data; in addition, the drug seems well tolerated with minimal adverse events.
Head-to-head comparisons between Rituximab and steroid plus ciclophosphamide in randomized clinical trials are missing.
The investigators propose this study in order to test in a randomized controlled trial the hypothesis that selective B lymphocyte depletion obtained with Rituximab is more effective than cyclical corticosteroid/alkylating-agent therapy in inducing long-term remission of proteinuria in patients undergoing the initial treatment of with IMN and nephrotic syndrome. In addition, since specific assay for the above-mentioned autoantibodies are now available, the levels of these pathogenetic autoantibodies will be measured at baseline and during treatment. Finally, the study will compare the safety profile of steroid plus cyclophosphamide and Rituximab by evaluating the rate and severity of adverse events.
Design and Power Considerations
The investigators hypothesized that the remission probability in the RTX arm will be greater than in the active comparator group (superiority design). Available data (Ponticelli 1998) suggest that the probability of complete remission with standard therapy is 15% at one year.
The investigators plan to enroll 70 patients in this pilot RCT. This sample size will be able to detect with a power of 80% (and a two-sided P of 0.05) an odds ratio of 3, i.e. change in probability from 0.15 to 0.45 - a very optimistic effect. Smaller (and likely more reasonable) effects would require larger studies.
The study will provide an estimate of this true effect, if it exists.
Adverse effects:
Patients will be directly questioned every two weeks during the drug exposure and then at monthly intervals during follow-up. In addition a contact number will be provided to the subjects to call if they experience any adverse affect or if they suspect adverse effect at any time between specific visits
Definition Of Proteinuric Status
UP = urinary protein (g/24h)
Complete remission (CR) UP ≤ 0.3 g
Partial remission (PR): Reduction in UP of \> 50% plus final UP ≤ 3.5 g but \>0.3g
Non-response (NR): Reduction in UP of \< 50% (includes increase in UP \<50%)
Neither CR nor PR
Progression: Proteinuria /S. creatinine increases by \> 50% over the baseline
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RITUXIMAB
1 g. IV of Rituximab on days 1 and 15
Rituximab
Rituximab,1 g IV, day 1 and day 15
Corticosteroids and Cyclophosphamide
Month 1, 3 and 5: 1g IV methylprednisolone daily for 3 doses; oral methylprednisolone (0.4mg/kg/day) or prednisone (0.5/mg/kg/day); Month 2, 4 and 6: Oral Cyclophosphamide (2.0 mg/kg/day)
Methylprednisolone
Methylprednisolone 1 g IV daily for 3 doses, then oral methylprednisolone (0.4 mg/kg/day) or oral prednisone (0.5mg/kg/day) for 27 days during Month 1, 3, 5.
Cyclophosphamide
Month 2, 4 and 6: Oral Cyclophosphamide (2.0 mg/kg/day) for 30 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rituximab
Rituximab,1 g IV, day 1 and day 15
Methylprednisolone
Methylprednisolone 1 g IV daily for 3 doses, then oral methylprednisolone (0.4 mg/kg/day) or oral prednisone (0.5mg/kg/day) for 27 days during Month 1, 3, 5.
Cyclophosphamide
Month 2, 4 and 6: Oral Cyclophosphamide (2.0 mg/kg/day) for 30 days
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Proteinuria \> 3.5 g/24h on three 24-hour urine collection (once a week for 3 weeks)
3. Estimated GFR (MDRD formula) ≥ 30ml/min/1.73m2 under ACEI/ARB therapy
4. Post-menopausal females, or females surgically sterile or practicing a medically approved method of contraception (no birth-control pill)
5. Three months of ACEI and/or ARB therapy before treatment
6. Blood Pressure \<130/80 mm Hg
7. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy
8. Patients remaining with proteinuria \>3.5g/24h after 3 months of ACEI and/or ARB therapy and Blood Pressure \<130/80 mm Hg may be randomized to RTX / cyclical corticosteroid/alkylating-agent therapy without the need of the run-in/conservative phase of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. previous treatment with Rituximab, Steroids, Alkylating Agents, Calcineurin Inhibitors, Synthetic ACTH, MMF, Azathioprine
3. Presence of active infection
4. Secondary cause of MN (e.g. hepatitis B, SLE, medications, malignancies). Testing for HIV, Hepatitis B and C should have occurred \< 6 months prior to enrollment into the study
5. Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
6. Pregnancy or nursing for safety reasons
7. Renal vein thrombosis documented prior to entry by renal US or CT scan
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bari
OTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu
OTHER
University of Messina
OTHER
University of Milan
OTHER
Universita di Verona
OTHER
University of Chieti
OTHER
University of Bologna
OTHER
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma E
OTHER
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
OTHER
Regione Piemonte
OTHER
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
OTHER
University of Pisa
OTHER
University of Milano Bicocca
OTHER
Humanitas Hospital, Italy
OTHER
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico
OTHER
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
OTHER
University of Bern
OTHER
University of Alberta
OTHER
Istituto Giannina Gaslini
OTHER
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Francesco Scolari
DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF NEPHROLOGY, MONTICHIARI HOSPITAL
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
FRANCESCO SCOLARI, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Division of Nephrology, Montichiari Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia
Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Glassock RJ. The pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy: evolution and revolution. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2012 May;21(3):235-42. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283522ea8.
Cravedi P, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P. Rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy: first-line therapy, why not? Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;128(3-4):261-9. doi: 10.1159/000368589. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
Murtas C, Bruschi M, Candiano G, Moroni G, Magistroni R, Magnano A, Bruno F, Radice A, Furci L, Argentiero L, Carnevali ML, Messa P, Scolari F, Sinico RA, Gesualdo L, Fervenza FC, Allegri L, Ravani P, Ghiggeri GM. Coexistence of different circulating anti-podocyte antibodies in membranous nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Sep;7(9):1394-400. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02170312. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
Ponticelli C, Zucchelli P, Passerini P, Cesana B, Locatelli F, Pasquali S, Sasdelli M, Redaelli B, Grassi C, Pozzi C, et al. A 10-year follow-up of a randomized study with methylprednisolone and chlorambucil in membranous nephropathy. Kidney Int. 1995 Nov;48(5):1600-4. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.453.
Jha V, Ganguli A, Saha TK, Kohli HS, Sud K, Gupta KL, Joshi K, Sakhuja V. A randomized, controlled trial of steroids and cyclophosphamide in adults with nephrotic syndrome caused by idiopathic membranous nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jun;18(6):1899-904. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007020166. Epub 2007 May 9.
von Groote TC, Williams G, Au EH, Chen Y, Mathew AT, Hodson EM, Tunnicliffe DJ. Immunosuppressive treatment for primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):CD004293. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004293.pub4.
Scolari F, Delbarba E, Santoro D, Gesualdo L, Pani A, Dallera N, Mani LY, Santostefano M, Feriozzi S, Quaglia M, Boscutti G, Ferrantelli A, Marcantoni C, Passerini P, Magistroni R, Alberici F, Ghiggeri GM, Ponticelli C, Ravani P; RI-CYCLO Investigators. Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy: The RI-CYCLO Randomized Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Apr;32(4):972-982. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020071091. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Scolari F, Dallera N, Gesualdo L, Santoro D, Pani A, Santostefano M, Feriozzi S, Mani LY, Boscutti G, Messa P, Magistroni R, Quaglia M, Ponticelli C, Ravani P. Rituximab versus steroids and cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: protocol of a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 4;9(12):e029232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029232.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EudraCT 2011 006115-59
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.