Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Study (TMR)

NCT ID: NCT05408520

Last Updated: 2023-04-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-31

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of targeted muscle reinnervation on the outcomes of amputees at a level 1 trauma center. The investigators propose to randomize all patients requiring amputation with and without targeted muscle reinnervation. This study will help delineate the efficacy of targeted muscle reinnervation in the general population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After an amputation, patients often experience pain, both from the cut nerves themselves as well as perceived pain from a 'missing' limb. A technique has been developed to regenerate the cut nerve so that it doesn't cause pain. The technique includes sewing the nerve into another nerve so that it continues to function. This technique, called targeted muscle reinnervation, can reduce the postoperative pain amputee patients experience.

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has shown promising success in the reduction of neuroma and phantom limb pain following extremity amputation. TMR was originally designed to allow for regenerative neurotization of end target muscle for the purpose of utilizing myoelectric prosthesis for amputees. While these indications have been successful, it has been the secondary outcome of reduction in neuroma and phantom limb pain that have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes.

In the United States there are 200,000 amputations every year, and 1.6 million Americans living as amputees. Despite the technical success of the procedures, over 75% of patients will experience neuroma pain, and 85% will experience phantom limb pain. In addition, this pain limits the postoperative ambulation of many patients leading to a 75% 5-year mortality rate for patients who undergo lower extremity amputation in the US.3 TMR has shown promising clinical results in addressing phantom limb and neuroma pain. In pooled data it showed that patients who underwent TMR had residual limb pain of 0% and phantom limb pain of 7%. In a larger comparative study of 489 patients, patients who underwent TMR had phantom limb pain scores with an average of 1, compared to an average of 5 for control amputees. The TMR patients also had an average residual limb pain of 1, compared to an average of 4 for controls.

Yet despite these promising outcomes, questions with TMR still remain. In the Valerio study, the largest study to date, all patients were grouped together regardless of the reason for amputation. While the percentage of patients undergoing amputation for cancer, infection, ischemia, trauma, or other, was reported, there was no comparison of outcomes in these groups. In a new study, the benefits of TMR have been shown to hold in highly comorbid patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center. Given the outcomes of TMR in these studies, there seems to be strong evidence to encourage the procedure, yet no study has yet to randomize patients to measure the true clinical outcome in a trauma population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A traditional amputation follows the normal standard of care, with transection of peripheral nerves. The TMR procedure will transfer the transected nerves to adjacent muscle nerves.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Amputation with TMR

Amputation will follow standard procedure, but with the addition of the TMR procedure, which involves rerouting severed or injured nerves to new muscle targets using microsurgical techniques to provide the nerve endings with a new muscle to innervate.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

When a nerve is severed or injured, it attempts to regenerate. The TMR procedure will transfer the transected nerves to adjacent muscle nerves in efforts to encourage the nerve to regenerate in an organized fashion.

Amputation without TMR (SOC)

A traditional amputation follows the normal standard of care, with transection of peripheral nerves.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation

When a nerve is severed or injured, it attempts to regenerate. The TMR procedure will transfer the transected nerves to adjacent muscle nerves in efforts to encourage the nerve to regenerate in an organized fashion.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Any individual 18 years and older indicated for a below knee or above knee amputation at Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Joshua Hustedt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joshua Hustedt

Assistant Professor, Orthopedics

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joshua Hustedt, MD, MHS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Banner - University Medical Center, Phoenix campus

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bowen JB, Ruter D, Wee C, West J, Valerio IL. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Technique in Below-Knee Amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):309-312. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005133.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30589808 (View on PubMed)

Kuiken TA, Dumanian GA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA. The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004 Dec;28(3):245-53. doi: 10.3109/03093640409167756.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15658637 (View on PubMed)

Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18295618 (View on PubMed)

Bowen JB, Wee CE, Kalik J, Valerio IL. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation to Improve Pain, Prosthetic Tolerance, and Bioprosthetic Outcomes in the Amputee. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Aug 1;6(8):261-267. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0717.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28831329 (View on PubMed)

Souza JM, Cheesborough JE, Ko JH, Cho MS, Kuiken TA, Dumanian GA. Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Oct;472(10):2984-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3528-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24562875 (View on PubMed)

Valerio IL, Dumanian GA, Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Bowen JB, West JM, Porter K, Ko JH, Souza JM, Potter BK. Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30634038 (View on PubMed)

Valerio I, Schulz SA, West J, Westenberg RF, Eberlin KR. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Combined with a Vascularized Pedicled Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 25;8(3):e2689. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002689. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32537346 (View on PubMed)

Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, Ertl WJ, Tintle SM, Nanos GP, Valerio IL, Kuiken TA, Apkarian AV, Porter K, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30371518 (View on PubMed)

Chang BL, Mondshine J, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Improves Pain and Ambulation Outcomes in Highly Comorbid Amputees. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):376-386. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008153.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34398088 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00000650

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.