Validation of Optical Device for Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement

NCT ID: NCT05400421

Last Updated: 2022-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-30

Study Completion Date

2022-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Existing techniques available for capturing reliable aortic pulse wave velocity measurements and estimating aortic stiffness are costly and require technical expertise. The purpose of this research is to investigate an oximeter device performance as a stand-alone aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement instrument. By validating this device and its measurements against the gold-standard method of carotid-femoral readings, we aim to demonstrate that the proposed method is an comparably effective in terms of the metrics (Mean difference, standard deviation, correlation, etc.) outlined by the Artery Society Guidelines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Device Calibration & Algorithm Training

The data obtained from this group will be used to a) quantify the relationship between PWV measured at the groin versus the thigh for less intrusive future piezo sensor placement and b) train the proposed device for the next cohort.

System & Method for Monitoring Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity & Blood Pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity will be compared against values collected from the oximeter system. The former is assessed by placing piezoelectric pressure sensors at three locations: the right common carotid artery, the right common femoral artery (groin), and the right superficial femoral artery (thigh). The oximeter will be secured on the right index finger. Simultaneous data collection will occur for both methods, with each trail lasting 60 seconds.

Device & Algorithm Testing

The gold-standard and new device values will be collected from this group to validate the previously trained system.

System & Method for Monitoring Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity & Blood Pressure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity will be compared against values collected from the oximeter system. The former is assessed by placing piezoelectric pressure sensors at three locations: the right common carotid artery, the right common femoral artery (groin), and the right superficial femoral artery (thigh). The oximeter will be secured on the right index finger. Simultaneous data collection will occur for both methods, with each trail lasting 60 seconds.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

System & Method for Monitoring Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity & Blood Pressure

Carotid-femoral aortic pulse wave velocity will be compared against values collected from the oximeter system. The former is assessed by placing piezoelectric pressure sensors at three locations: the right common carotid artery, the right common femoral artery (groin), and the right superficial femoral artery (thigh). The oximeter will be secured on the right index finger. Simultaneous data collection will occur for both methods, with each trail lasting 60 seconds.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

* History of cardiovascular disease
* Not in sinus rhythm/arrhythmia
* Pacemaker
* Impalpable arterial pulse
* Use of blood pressure medication
* Systolic blood pressure \> 140
* Use of vasoactive medication
* Use of cholesterol medication
* Diabetes diagnosis
* Smokers
* BMI \> 30 kg/m2
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VitalSines International Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jess Goodman, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VitalSines International Inc.

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jess Goodman, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

416-670-9306

Clare Wei

Role: CONTACT

289-338-5669

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H. Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2003 Jun 10;107(22):2864-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069826.36125.B4. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12796414 (View on PubMed)

Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, Tropeano AI, Gautier I, Laloux B, Boutouyrie P. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke. 2003 May;34(5):1203-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000065428.03209.64. Epub 2003 Apr 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12677025 (View on PubMed)

Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T, Filipovsky J, Huybrechts S, Mattace-Raso FU, Protogerou AD, Schillaci G, Segers P, Vermeersch S, Weber T; Artery Society; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function; European Network for Noninvasive Investigation of Large Arteries. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012 Mar;30(3):445-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834fa8b0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22278144 (View on PubMed)

Xu SK, Hong XF, Cheng YB, Liu CY, Li Y, Yin B, Wang JG. Validation of a Piezoelectric Sensor Array-Based Device for Measurement of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity: The Philips Prototype. Pulse (Basel). 2018 Mar;5(1-4):161-168. doi: 10.1159/000486317. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29761092 (View on PubMed)

Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M. Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation. 1989 Dec;80(6):1652-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.80.6.1652.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2598428 (View on PubMed)

Chirinos JA, Segers P, Duprez DA, Brumback L, Bluemke DA, Zamani P, Kronmal R, Vaidya D, Ouyang P, Townsend RR, Jacobs DR Jr. Late systolic central hypertension as a predictor of incident heart failure: the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 3;4(3):e001335. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001335.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25736440 (View on PubMed)

Ding FH, Fan WX, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, Li Y, Wang JG. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement. Am J Hypertens. 2011 Dec;24(12):1306-11. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2011.145. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21976274 (View on PubMed)

Pereira T, Maldonado J, Coutinho R, Cardoso E, Laranjeiro M, Andrade I, Conde J. Invasive validation of the Complior Analyse in the assessment of central artery pressure curves: a methodological study. Blood Press Monit. 2014 Oct;19(5):280-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000058.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24892879 (View on PubMed)

Wang TW, Lin SF. Wearable Piezoelectric-Based System for Continuous Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Measurement. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 5;20(3):851. doi: 10.3390/s20030851.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32033495 (View on PubMed)

Park J, Seok HS, Kim SS, Shin H. Photoplethysmogram Analysis and Applications: An Integrative Review. Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 1;12:808451. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.808451. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35300400 (View on PubMed)

I.B. Wilkinson, C.M. McEniery, G. Schillaci, P. Boutouyrie, P. Segers, A. Donald, et al. ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity Artery Res, 4 (2) (2010), p. 34

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OBA-MAPWV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.