Pulse Study: Peripheral Use of Low-dose Vasopressors for Safety and Efficacy in the Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT06920173

Last Updated: 2025-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-03

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Using medications to increase blood pressure, called vasopressors, is invaluable in treating patients who have difficulty maintaining stable blood pressure. Vasopressors are usually infused through a central venous catheter (CVC), which is a flexible tube placed in the large vein of the neck, arm or groin. CVCs require a skilled clinician and often with an ultrasound to prevent complications such as a collapsed lung or bleeding. Alternatively, the infusion of vasopressors through a peripheral venous catheter (PVC), a thin tube placed in the smaller veins of the arm or hand has been avoided due to the risk of extravasation, which is the leakage of fluid to surrounding tissues. This can lead to potential tissue death requiring surgery. However, emerging research shows the safety of infusing vasopressors through a PVC, referred to as peripheral vasopressors. There is a growing interest in peripheral vasopressors for two main reasons: to expedite vasopressor initiation in patients with refractory shock and to avoid CVC placement and its potential complications. However, a standardized protocol for administration is lacking and many clinicians still avoid peripheral vasopressors due to lack of high-quality evidence. The investigators will examine the effectiveness of implementing a peripheral vasopressor protocol by conducting a feasibility study and assessing outcomes such as the safety of peripheral vasopressors and the acceptability rate of healthcare providers. By conducting this study, the investigators aim to provide the framework to conduct larger, multi-center trials and to provide high-quality data for the future use of a standardized peripheral vasopressor protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the intensive care unit (ICU), vasopressors are administered when fluid resuscitation alone cannot maintain adequate blood pressure in patients with shock. The standard of care for continuous infusions of vasopressors is through a central venous catheter (CVC) rather than a peripheral venous catheter (PVC). The use of CVCs prevents extravasation, which can lead to local tissue ischemia resulting in necrosis. However, CVC placement is not a benign procedure requiring a skilled clinician and the use of ultrasound guidance to prevent complications such as pneumothorax, bleeding or erroneous arterial cannulation. Furthermore, complications related to the maintenance of CVCs include deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). These recognized complications occur in more than 15% of patients. There is a growing interest in peripheral vasopressor use for two main reasons: to expedite vasopressor administration in patients with refractory shock and to potentially avoid CVC placement and it complications. However, there remains no standardized protocols and many clinicians still believe that vasopressors must be infused through a CVC despite current evidence showing the safety of peripheral vasopressors. However, to date only observational studies have been performed. A randomized control trial is needed to provide high quality data to improve the future use of peripheral vasopressors, which has the potential to positively impact patient care.

The investigators will perform a feasibility study for the implementation of a peripheral vasopressor protocol. They will also assess the safety of the peripheral vasopressor protocol and evaluate clinically relevant outcomes, which will be listed below. The investigators hypothesize that implementing a peripheral vasopressor protocol is feasible and safe.

Aim 1: Adapt a peripheral vasopressor protocol and perform a feasibility study. The investigators will conduct a feasibility study to determine the efficacy of a peripheral vasopressor protocol. In collaboration with an ICU pharmacist, the investigators will adopt a peripheral vasopressor protocol at Kingston Health Sciences Center to determine the dosages and concentrations of each vasopressor. The participants will be randomized 1:1:1 into a low-dose peripheral vasopressor group vs. a dose peripheral vasopressor group vs a high-dose peripheral vasopressor group vs a CVC group. Based on the admission rates of our ICU, the investigators aim to recruit 25 patients into each group. They will investigate the feasibility of recruitment, data capture rate, acceptability rate by nursing staff and providers of the peripheral vasopressor protocol and avoidance rate of CVC placement.

Aim 2a: Perform a safety assessment of peripheral vasopressor protocol. The investigators will assess the safety of peripheral vasopressor administration after two months of protocol initiation. Specific adverse events to be captured include extravasation (+/- tissue necrosis), pneumothorax, arterial cannulation, and deep vein thrombosis. The investigators will assess any differences in adverse events between the low-dose peripheral vasopressor group vs the high-dose peripheral vasopressor group vs the CVC group, which will be reported as proportions. The investigators hypothesize that peripheral vasopressor use will be safe compared to the CVC group, with few to no adverse events.

Aim 2b: Determine the impact of a peripheral vasopressor protocol on clinically relevant outcomes. This feasibility study will investigate secondary outcomes such as alive and central line-free days, infection rates including CLABSIs, mortality and ICU/hospital length of stay. The investigators will report these outcomes as medians with 95% confidence intervals.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock Peripheral Venous Catheterization Central Venous Catheterization Critically Ill Patients Admitted in ICU

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The proposed study design is a prospective, pragmatic, unblinded feasibility study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peripheral Venous Catheter

Patients in this arm will have vasopressors infusing through a peripheral venous catheter. If patients have escalating doses of vasopressors or require more than 2 vasopressors, they will have a central venous catheter placed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experiemental: Peripheral Venous Catheter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients older than 18 years of age who present with shock requiring vasopressors at the following minimum doses: norepinephrine 5 mcg/min, phenylephrine 50 mcg/min, epinephrine 5 mc/min, dobutamine 5 mcg/kg/min. Vasopressors are infused through a peripheral venous catheter (18 gauge or larger); however, patients are crossed over to the central venous catheter group if the maximum vasopressor dose is reached or more than two vasopressors.

Central Venous Catheter

Patients in this group will have vasopressors infusing through a central venous catheter

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Experiemental: Peripheral Venous Catheter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients older than 18 years of age who present with shock requiring vasopressors at the following minimum doses: norepinephrine 5 mcg/min, phenylephrine 50 mcg/min, epinephrine 5 mc/min, dobutamine 5 mcg/kg/min. Vasopressors are infused through a peripheral venous catheter (18 gauge or larger); however, patients are crossed over to the central venous catheter group if the maximum vasopressor dose is reached or more than two vasopressors.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experiemental: Peripheral Venous Catheter

Patients older than 18 years of age who present with shock requiring vasopressors at the following minimum doses: norepinephrine 5 mcg/min, phenylephrine 50 mcg/min, epinephrine 5 mc/min, dobutamine 5 mcg/kg/min. Vasopressors are infused through a peripheral venous catheter (18 gauge or larger); however, patients are crossed over to the central venous catheter group if the maximum vasopressor dose is reached or more than two vasopressors.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 18 or older who do not have a central line or PICC line already placed
* Presence of shock requiring vasopressors at the following minimum doses: norepinephrine 5 mcg/min, phenylephrine 50 mcg/min, epinephrine 5 mc/min, dobutamine 5 mcg/kg/min

Exclusion Criteria

* Urgent need for dialysis requiring placement of hemodialysis catheter
* More than two vasopressors are required to maintain a MAP \>65 on admission to the ICU
* Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kingston Health Sciences Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Gordon Boyd

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gord Dr., PhD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kingston Health Sciences Center

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dr. Boyd, PhD, MD

Role: CONTACT

613-549-6666 ext. 6228

Dr. Wiseman, MD

Role: CONTACT

613-859-6486

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dr. Boyd, PhD, MD

Role: primary

613-549-6666 ext. 6228

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marti K, Hartley C, Sweeney E, Mah J, Pugliese N. Evaluation of the safety of a novel peripheral vasopressor pilot program and the impact on central line placement in medical and surgical intensive care units. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Aug 19;79(Suppl 3):S79-S85. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac144.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35605137 (View on PubMed)

Loubani OM, Green RS. A systematic review of extravasation and local tissue injury from administration of vasopressors through peripheral intravenous catheters and central venous catheters. J Crit Care. 2015 Jun;30(3):653.e9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25669592 (View on PubMed)

Munroe ES, Heath ME, Eteer M, Gershengorn HB, Horowitz JK, Jones J, Kaatz S, Tamae Kakazu M, McLaughlin E, Flanders SA, Prescott HC. Use and Outcomes of Peripheral Vasopressors in Early Sepsis-Induced Hypotension Across Michigan Hospitals: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Chest. 2024 Apr;165(4):847-857. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.027. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37898185 (View on PubMed)

McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra011883. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12646670 (View on PubMed)

Stolz A, Efendy R, Apte Y, Craswell A, Lin F, Ramanan M. Safety and efficacy of peripheral versus centrally administered vasopressor infusion: A single-centre retrospective observational study. Aust Crit Care. 2022 Sep;35(5):506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34600834 (View on PubMed)

Kalinoski M, Kalinoski T, Pendleton K. The use of peripheral vasopressors and its implications for hospital medicine. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2024 Jul 30;85(7):1-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0048. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39078910 (View on PubMed)

Abu Sardaneh A, Penm J, Oliver M, Gattas D, McLachlan AJ, James C, Cella C, Aljuhani O, Acquisto NM, Patanwala AE. International pharmacy survey of peripheral vasopressor infusions in critical care (INFUSE). J Crit Care. 2023 Dec;78:154376. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154376. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37536012 (View on PubMed)

Owen VS, Rosgen BK, Cherak SJ, Ferland A, Stelfox HT, Fiest KM, Niven DJ. Adverse events associated with administration of vasopressor medications through a peripheral intravenous catheter: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2021 Apr 16;25(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03553-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33863361 (View on PubMed)

Yerke JR, Mireles-Cabodevila E, Chen AY, Bass SN, Reddy AJ, Bauer SR, Kokoczka L, Dugar S, Moghekar A. Peripheral Administration of Norepinephrine: A Prospective Observational Study. Chest. 2024 Feb;165(2):348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.08.019. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37611862 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6042888

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

OPALS Critical Care Sub-Studies
NCT00212953 COMPLETED NA