Effect of Phlebotomy on Heartrate in Polycythemia Patients

NCT ID: NCT05396170

Last Updated: 2024-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-21

Study Completion Date

2025-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Single-centre, observational within-subject design: patients that undergo phlebotomies regularly for polycythemia will be measured continuously by wearables one week before until one week after a phlebotomy, for three phlebotomies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Little is known about the effect of a hemoglobin-shift on patients, anaemic, non-anaemic or even polycythaemic. It has been established that severe anaemia has deteriorating effects on the patient, which can be (partially) reversed by treatments like transfusion, erythropoietin stimulating agents or iron/vitamin supplements, depending of the etiology of the anaemia. However, the optimal haemoglobin target and threshold for such treatments has yet to be determined. It is therefore necessary to evaluate what the exact effect of various haemoglobin levels, and a shift therein, is on the physiology of patients. Only then can the benefits be weighed properly against the risks for individual patients when considering treatment for anaemia, safety of blood donation, or expected effect of phlebotomy for polycythaemia.

Primary Objective:

\- Compare the per individual and per group effects of a reduction in Hb mass on physical functional outcomes (heart rate; activity parameters; QoL) in patients with polycythaemia.

Secondary Objectives:

\- Compare the primary outcomes to data from the REMOTE-2 and FAINT-study (similar measurements in transfusion dependent patients and whole blood donors)

Study design: Within-subject design. Patients will be remotely monitored one week before phlebotomy until one week after.

Study population: Adult patients with a polycythaemia requiring phlebotomies on a regular basis.

Main study parameters: heart rate, blood pressure, activity parameters and quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Polycythemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

phlebotomy

500ml of blood phlebotomized per standard of care to reduce symptoms from polycythemia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with polycythaemia, requiring phlebotomy on a regular basis (at least every 4 months)
* Subjects aged ≥18 years
* In possession of a smartphone
* Life expectancy ≥ 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Poor performance/functional status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group system ECOG ≥3)
* Participants with known arrhythmias or other significant cardiological conductivity disorders (Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is allowed)
* Hospitalized subjects
* Subjects with a pacemaker.
* Subjects with a secondary polyglobulia due to eg smoking or other pulmonary issues.
* Scheduled oncological treatments or surgery during the study period.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Leiden University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

jjzwaginga

Prof. dr. J.J. Zwaginga

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jaap Jan Zwaginga, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

LUMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LUMC

Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rik Tonino, MD

Role: CONTACT

+31623248432

Jaap Jan Zwaginga, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

071 526 9111 ext. +31

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rik Tonino, MD

Role: primary

Jaap Jan Zwaginga, MD, PhD

Role: backup

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N22.055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.