Vancomycin Monitoring: Is AUC Monitoring Appropriate for More Than Just Serious MRSA Infections?
NCT ID: NCT05395520
Last Updated: 2023-07-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
146 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-04-08
2024-04-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin in Critical Ill Patients: a Registry
NCT02896218
Vancomycin vs. Vancomycin Plus Gentamycin in Treatment of MRSA Infection
NCT00304811
Vancomycin Dosing for Serious MRSA Infections: A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial of Trough Level Versus AUC/MIC
NCT04793152
Prospective Evaluation of a Vancomycin Nomogram With a Continuous Infusion of Vancomycin for Surgical ICU Patients
NCT01786161
The Most Appropriate Parameter Correlates With Clinical Effectiveness of Vancomycin: Trough Drug Concentration or Area Under Curve (AUC)/Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)?
NCT01995760
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The 2020 guidelines continue to enforce AUC/MIC as the preferred PK/PD parameter, but now recommend utilizing vancomycin peak and trough concentrations to target an AUC/MIC of 400-600 mg\*h/L for serious MRSA infections. Although this AUC goal is not new, the 2009 consensus guidelines previously recommended trough only monitoring as a simplistic surrogate marker for attaining this AUC goal. Furthermore, the most accurate way of calculating AUC requires obtaining two steady state vancomycin serum concentrations over one dosing period. In this way, AUC guided monitoring requires more pharmacist and nursing time, the use of more hospital resources and additional cost to the patient.
As was true of the 2009 guidelines, the 2020 guidelines also leave certain questions unanswered. The paucity and conflicting data of vancomycin monitoring in patients with non-serious MRSA infections (skin and soft tissue infections, urinary tract infections, etc.), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections and non-staphylococcal pathogen infections has left no guidance on the ideal vancomycin PK/PD targets in these patient populations. A literature search of AUC/MIC monitoring in patients with streptococcal and enterococcal infections yielded very few studies in patients with enterococcal infections and no studies in patients with streptococcal infections.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retrospective chart review
Retrospective chart review to be conducted at Methodist Charlton Medical Center (MCMC) in Dallas, TX. Adult patients who received vancomycin while inpatient at MCMC with at least one corresponding vancomycin trough level taken at steady state will be included. All vancomycin orders by providers are entered as pharmacy to dose; thus dosing and routine monitoring is conducted by pharmacists.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years and older
* At least 1 vancomycin trough concentration drawn at steady state
* Organism with an MIC of 2 mg/L, if vancomycin was continued and in whom a steady state trough concentration was obtained
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Akins Ronda, PharmD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
007.PHA.2021.C
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.