Quantifying Gram-negative Resistance to Empiric Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT05171257

Last Updated: 2022-03-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

304 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-19

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health emergency estimated to be responsible for 700,000 deaths per year worldwide, and it is well known that previous antibiotic exposure is the single most contributing factor. For example, the use of non-antipseudomonal agents can increase risk for any P. aeruginosa strain; however, the use of an agent with antipseudomonal activity would select for resistance to that particular antimicrobial agent or class. Demonstrated that each additional day of exposure to any antipseudomonal beta-lactam is associated with an increased risk of new resistance development.

The study seeks to determine whether the choice of empiric therapy (i.e., the same agent versus a different agent from prior antibiotic exposure) has any effect on the likelihood of in vitro activity against GN pathogens (GNPs) in a subsequent infection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Antimicrobials are the most commonly prescribed drugs in medicine, resulting in inappropriate use in approximately 50% of cases Misuse can have devastating effects through resistance development which further complicates selection of appropriate empiric antibiotics. In cases of severe illness, it is easy for clinicians to rely on broad spectrum antibiotics to cover the majority of likely pathogens when dealing with a presumed bacterial infection. However, this practice perpetuates the cycle of resistance. Inappropriate empiric therapy is associated with worse outcomes in resistant Gram-negative (GN) bacteremia and pneumonia, so clinicians should strive for targeted coverage that is specific to the pathogen of interest when possible. Johnson et al. showed that patients with recent antibiotic exposure had greater inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy (45.4% vs. 21.2%; p \< 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (51.3% vs. 34.0%; p \< 0.001) compared with patients without recent antibiotic exposure.

The 2020 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections reports an increased risk of resistance with antibiotic exposure in the past 30 days. Additionally, expert opinion prompts consideration of empiric coverage with a GN agent from a different class that offers comparable spectrum of activity from previous exposure. The 2019 Community-acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and IDSA lists prior antibiotic use in the last 90 days as a risk factor for P. aeruginosa.The 2016 Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (HAP, VAP) Guidelines from IDSA, list antibiotic use in the past 90 days as a risk factor for P. aeruginosa and other GN organisms in HAP. Additionally, antibiotic use in the past 90 days is listed as having an association with increased risk of multi-drug resistant VAP. The CAP, HAP, and VAP Guidelines do not mention using the same versus different agent as empiric choice if previous antibiotic exposure is to an anti-pseudomonal agent.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

repeat group

patients receiving empiric therapy with the same IV antibiotics from prior

IV antibiotic treatment from prior

Intervention Type DRUG

patients receiving same IV antibiotic treatment from prior

change group

patients receiving differing IV antibiotics from prior

differing IV antibiotic treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

patients receiving differing IV antibiotics from prior

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

IV antibiotic treatment from prior

patients receiving same IV antibiotic treatment from prior

Intervention Type DRUG

differing IV antibiotic treatment

patients receiving differing IV antibiotics from prior

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥18 years of age
* GNP pneumonia or bacteremia during hospital admission
* Previous IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours in the past 90 days
* Culture MIC data available

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of isolate resistance in the previous six months to antibiotics being studied
* Patients that received antibiotics within five days prior to study inclusion
* Patients on more than one anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics (excluding emergency department doses) during previous exposure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Methodist Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mathew Crotty, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Methodist

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

038.PHA.2021.D

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.