Development a New Scale for Assessment Shoulder Problems
NCT ID: NCT05391516
Last Updated: 2026-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
450 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-09-01
2025-07-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Scale development followed a four-stage process including literature review, semi-structured patient interviews, expert content validation (Lawshe method), pilot testing, and main field testing in multiple physical therapy units across Turkey. In the main application, SPAS was administered to individuals with shoulder problems and evaluated for construct validity using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, reliability using internal consistency and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients (3-7 days), and concurrent validity through correlation with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to derive a clinically interpretable SPAS cut-off value using a SPADI-based functional limitation reference. The study aims to provide a valid, reliable, practical, and culturally appropriate PROM that can be used in routine clinical assessment and research in Turkey.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Functional Shoulder Score
NCT03658707
Reliability of the Subacromial Distance Measurements With Standard Radiographic Imaging
NCT04759027
Investigating the Development, Validity, and Reliability of the Avoidance of Sports Activities Photo Scale
NCT06266273
A Comparison of the Long Term Effects of the Traditional and Modified Posterior Shoulder Stretching Exercise in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
NCT04660682
Evaluation of Functional Status, Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Patients With Rotator Cuff Syndrome
NCT04716855
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The development process followed a four-stage methodological framework. In the first stage, the conceptual framework and initial item pool were established through a comprehensive literature review, semi-structured interviews with patients experiencing shoulder problems, and input from experienced physical therapists. These steps aimed to identify daily activities that commonly provoke functional difficulty in routine life. An initial pool of 34 items was generated, including activity-based items structured in a hierarchical stepwise yes/no format.
In the second stage, content validity was evaluated by an expert panel using the Lawshe method. Items with insufficient content validity or conceptual overlap were revised, combined, or removed. A pilot study was then conducted to assess item clarity, cultural appropriateness, and comprehensibility. Based on expert feedback and pilot results, the item pool was refined and prepared for the main application.
The third stage consisted of a multicenter field application conducted in physical therapy units across multiple regions of Turkey. SPAS was administered to individuals with shoulder problems, followed by the Turkish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) for concurrent validity assessment. A subgroup of participants with stable clinical status completed SPAS again after 3-7 days to evaluate test-retest reliability.
In the final stage, psychometric analyses were performed. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with a robust diagonally weighted least squares estimator appropriate for the hierarchical response structure. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients. Concurrent validity was evaluated through correlations with SPADI scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine a clinically interpretable cut-off value for SPAS using a SPADI-derived functional limitation reference.
SPAS consists of 12 activity-based items, each comprising four ordered difficulty levels. Respondents indicate the level at which difficulty first appears, reflecting a threshold-based approach to functional limitation rather than graded symptom intensity. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater functional limitation. The study aims to provide a valid, reliable, and practical instrument for assessing shoulder-related functional limitations in clinical and research settings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All Participants
Participants; 18-80 years old, who volunteered to participate in the study, patients with shoulder problems.
Evaluation of shoulder problems
The developed items and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-SPADI will be directed to the participants.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evaluation of shoulder problems
The developed items and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-SPADI will be directed to the participants.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
OTHER
Suleyman Demirel University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Husamettin Kocak
Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ertuğrul Demirdel
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yalvac Devlet Hastanesi
Isparta, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SDU-HusamettinKocak-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.