Integrated Pulmonary Index Monitoring for Thoracic Surgery Patients

NCT ID: NCT05368740

Last Updated: 2022-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of postoperative Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) scores on postoperative complications, blood gas analysis, mortality and morbidity in the patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective observational clinical study was performed between August 1, 2020 and January 31, 2021. After faculty ethics committee approval (Cukurova University, decision number: 111, date 02.10.2020) and written informed patient consent, 97 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, over 18 years, volunteer to participate study, scheduled for elective VATS and thoracotomy surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were the presence of neuromuscular disorder, serious respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic disease, ASA score \> II, pneumonectomy surgery, morbid obesity with body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2, younger than 18 years old, pre-determined need for postoperative intensive care.

Routine monitoring (electrocardiogram, noninvasive arterial blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation) were applied before the induction of anesthesia to all patients. The induction was with intravenously (iv) 1.5-2 mg/kg propofol and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium. After adequate muscle relaxation, female patients were intubated with a 35-37 F, male patients were intubated with a 39-41 F double-lumen tube. Anesthesia was maintained by repeated rocuronium doses if needed, 1.5-2% sevoflurane and an oxygen-air mixture. One lung ventilation was started just before the thorax was opened.

At the end of the surgery, neuromuscular block was antagonised with neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) and atropine (0.015 mg/kg). Following extubation, patients were brought to the postanesthetic care unit (PACU) for 2 hours. For postoperative analgesia, regional techniques were used if the patients agreed, otherwise, iv opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were applied. All patients were given 2 L/minute oxygen as a standard with a nasal cannula. Postoperative pain was assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), if the patients complained of pain (VAS ≥ 4), iv 0.5 mg/kg meperidine was given as a rescue analgesia.

Age, height, body weight, BMI, ASA physical status, comorbidity, and respiratory function test values were recorded as demographic data. Surgery type, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, and complications also were recorded. Systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure, SpO2, EtCO2, IPI values (monitored with the CapnostreamTM35 portable respiratory monitor), and arterial blood gas analyzes (evaluated with the ABL800 BASIC blood gas device) were recorded at the 15, 30, 60 and 120th minutes at the PACU. After 2 hours, when patients met standard PACU discharge criteria (fully awake, stable hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, satisfaction analgesia) they were transferred to the thoracic surgery ward.

All patients were evaluated in three groups according to their IPI score: high IPI (score level 8-10) group, medium IPI (score level 5-7) group, and low IPI (score level 1-4) group. Required attention was defined as SpO2 was between 88% and 92%, RR ≤ 8 breath/minute or IPI score level was between 5 and 7. The required intervention was defined as SpO2 ≤ 88% and IPI score level was ≤ 4. Postoperatively, at 6, 12, 18 and 24th hours, hemodynamic values and arterial blood gas analyses, length of hospital stay, complications, need for intensive care and 28-day mortality were evaluated and recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Complications Monitoring

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

median IPI group

IPI score level was between 5-7

integrated pulmonary index monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) is a new monitoring method calculated using respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and heart rate (HR). It is designed to obtain information about the patients' oxygenation and ventilation in the form of a single value or waveform from 1 to 10 with a mathematical algorithm using fuzzy logic. According to this scoring system; 10= normal, 8-9= within normal range, 7= close to normal range, requires attention, 5-6= requires attention and may require intervention, 3-4= requires intervention, 1-2= requires immediate intervention \[2\].

high IPI group

IPI score level was between 8-10

integrated pulmonary index monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) is a new monitoring method calculated using respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and heart rate (HR). It is designed to obtain information about the patients' oxygenation and ventilation in the form of a single value or waveform from 1 to 10 with a mathematical algorithm using fuzzy logic. According to this scoring system; 10= normal, 8-9= within normal range, 7= close to normal range, requires attention, 5-6= requires attention and may require intervention, 3-4= requires intervention, 1-2= requires immediate intervention \[2\].

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

integrated pulmonary index monitor

Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) is a new monitoring method calculated using respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and heart rate (HR). It is designed to obtain information about the patients' oxygenation and ventilation in the form of a single value or waveform from 1 to 10 with a mathematical algorithm using fuzzy logic. According to this scoring system; 10= normal, 8-9= within normal range, 7= close to normal range, requires attention, 5-6= requires attention and may require intervention, 3-4= requires intervention, 1-2= requires immediate intervention \[2\].

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Capnostream-20, Medtronic

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II,
2. Over 18 years,
3. Scheduled for elective VATS and thoracotomy surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

1. Neuromuscular disorder,
2. Serious respiratory disease,
3. Serious cardiovascular disease,
4. Renal failure,
5. Hepatic failure,
6. ASA score \> II,
7. Pneumonectomy surgery,
8. Morbid obesity with body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2,
9. Younger than 18 years old,
10. Pre-determined need for postoperative intensive care.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cukurova University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

mediha turktan

associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mediha Türktan

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IPI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.