The Impact of Light Conditions on the Efficacy of Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation in Activities of Daily Living
NCT ID: NCT05359380
Last Updated: 2023-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
75 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-15
2022-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Near Vision Capacity in Different Light Conditions Following Bilateral Trifocal Intraocular Implantation
NCT03226561
Luminous Efficiency Function V(λ)' of Patients That Underwent Pseudophakic Presbyopic Corrections With EDOF IOLs
NCT07077967
Luminous Efficiency Function V(λ)' of Patients That Underwent Pseudophakic Presbyopic Corrections
NCT04263636
Functional Assessment of ADL in Patients Who Underwent Bifocal and Trifocal Presbyopic Correction
NCT03021512
Functional Assessment of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in Patients Who Underwent Mini-monovision Correction
NCT02431156
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary objective of this study is to identify the optimal task lighting conditions (in terms of light intensity and light temperature) for 10 ADLs that require near or intermediate vision acuity in a validated ADL simulation framework for a sample of patients who underwent presbyopic correction with bilateral multifocal IOLs implantation, and to compare their capacity to perform the ADLs (ADL scores) in 9 different lighting combinations (combinations of light intensity and light temperature) between three study groups: SG1. patients implanted bilaterally with trifocal diffractive IOLs, SG2. patients implanted bilaterally with bifocal hybrid (diffractive-refractive) IOLs, SG3. patients implanted bilaterally with monofocal IOLs
The study is conducted in an experimental facility in a hospital room with a dimension of 6.87 × 2.9 × 3 m (depth × width × height) and flat white surface walls (reflectance: 70%). Αn advanced light diffusion system has been installed, which consists of four linear LED luminaires producing low glare (unified glare rating (UGR) \< 19). Light intensity (dimming / in foot candles - fc) and light temperature (white tuning / (in Kelvins - K) have been adjusted using the Casambi wireless control application (Casambi Technologies Oy Inc., Espoo, Finland), which uses integrated Bluetooth mesh technology and secures maximal uniformity at different user-defined lighting settings. The four LED luminaires have been mounted on the ceiling. The exact luminaire positioning and the amount of the provided luminous flux have been defined using the RELUX light simulation tool (version 2021.1.1.0) (Relux Informatik AG, Münchenstein, Switzerland) prior to the installation. The confirmation of illuminance and on-site adjustments have been confirmed with the Extech Lux Meter EA30 (Extech Instruments Corporation, Nashua, NH, United States). As regards photometric properties derived from lighting laboratory photometric measurements, the correlated color temperature (CCT) of the luminaires ranges between 2700 K and 6500 K, emitting a maximum luminous flux of 10,626 lm and 11,508 lm, respectively. The exact radiant flux P(λ) emitted from the selected light sources has been measured using a Konica Minolta CL-500A spectrum meter for the wavelength range of 380-780 nm using a step of 1 nm. The power of each luminaire is 106 W, resulting in luminous efficacy of 100.2 lm/W and 108.6 lm/W for 2700 K and 6500 K, respectively. The color rendering index (CRI) is 84. The wireless dimming control system enables dimming from 0% to 100% and vice versa.
The 9 lighting combinations (light intensity, light temperature) are the following:
3000 K - 25 fc, 3000 K - 50 fc, 3000 K - 75 fc / 4000 K - 25 fc, 4000 K - 50 fc, 4000 K - 75 fc / 6000 K - 25 fc, 6000 K - 50 fc, 6000 K - 75 fc
In specific, patients address the following ten ADLs:
1\. Phone Book Search (PBS), 2. Supermarket receipt (SupRe), 3. Book reading (BR), 4. Cellular message (CM), 5. Cellular entry search (CES), 6. Reading computer screen (RCS), 7. Drops bottle reading (DR), 8. Subtitles reading (SubRe), 9. Open door test (ODT), and, 10. Screwdriver test (ST).
Test-retest reliability will be assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all ADLs at the nine combinations of light conditions in two different visits with an average 15-day time window to prevent memory effect.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SG1 - Trifocal Group
Patients implanted bilaterally with trifocal diffractive IOLs
ADL performance
ADL performance
All study groups address the following 10 ADL tasks in 9 different combinations of light temperature and light intensity in order possible differences to be revealed among the study groups and light combinations:
1\. Phone Book Search (PBS), 2. Supermarket receipt (SupRe), 3. Book reading (BR), 4. Cellular message (CM), 5. Cellular entry search (CES), 6. Reading computer screen (RCS), 7. Drops bottle reading (DR), 8. Subtitles reading (SubRe), 9. Open door test (ODT), and, 10. Screwdriver test (ST).
The 9 light combinations are the following:
3000 K - 25 fc, 3000 K - 50 fc, 3000 K - 75 fc / 4000 K - 25 fc, 4000 K - 50 fc, 4000 K - 75 fc / 6000 K - 25 fc, 6000 K - 50 fc, 6000 K - 75 fc
SG2 - Bifocal Group
Patients implanted bilaterally with bifocal hybrid (diffractive - refractive) IOLs
ADL performance
ADL performance
All study groups address the following 10 ADL tasks in 9 different combinations of light temperature and light intensity in order possible differences to be revealed among the study groups and light combinations:
1\. Phone Book Search (PBS), 2. Supermarket receipt (SupRe), 3. Book reading (BR), 4. Cellular message (CM), 5. Cellular entry search (CES), 6. Reading computer screen (RCS), 7. Drops bottle reading (DR), 8. Subtitles reading (SubRe), 9. Open door test (ODT), and, 10. Screwdriver test (ST).
The 9 light combinations are the following:
3000 K - 25 fc, 3000 K - 50 fc, 3000 K - 75 fc / 4000 K - 25 fc, 4000 K - 50 fc, 4000 K - 75 fc / 6000 K - 25 fc, 6000 K - 50 fc, 6000 K - 75 fc
SG3 - Monofocal Group
Patients implanted bilaterally with monofocal IOLs
ADL performance
ADL performance
All study groups address the following 10 ADL tasks in 9 different combinations of light temperature and light intensity in order possible differences to be revealed among the study groups and light combinations:
1\. Phone Book Search (PBS), 2. Supermarket receipt (SupRe), 3. Book reading (BR), 4. Cellular message (CM), 5. Cellular entry search (CES), 6. Reading computer screen (RCS), 7. Drops bottle reading (DR), 8. Subtitles reading (SubRe), 9. Open door test (ODT), and, 10. Screwdriver test (ST).
The 9 light combinations are the following:
3000 K - 25 fc, 3000 K - 50 fc, 3000 K - 75 fc / 4000 K - 25 fc, 4000 K - 50 fc, 4000 K - 75 fc / 6000 K - 25 fc, 6000 K - 50 fc, 6000 K - 75 fc
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ADL performance
ADL performance
All study groups address the following 10 ADL tasks in 9 different combinations of light temperature and light intensity in order possible differences to be revealed among the study groups and light combinations:
1\. Phone Book Search (PBS), 2. Supermarket receipt (SupRe), 3. Book reading (BR), 4. Cellular message (CM), 5. Cellular entry search (CES), 6. Reading computer screen (RCS), 7. Drops bottle reading (DR), 8. Subtitles reading (SubRe), 9. Open door test (ODT), and, 10. Screwdriver test (ST).
The 9 light combinations are the following:
3000 K - 25 fc, 3000 K - 50 fc, 3000 K - 75 fc / 4000 K - 25 fc, 4000 K - 50 fc, 4000 K - 75 fc / 6000 K - 25 fc, 6000 K - 50 fc, 6000 K - 75 fc
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of senile cataract either stage 2 or 3 of the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS-3) grading scale - Patients underwent phacoemulsification and bilateral implantation of IOLs \[trifocal diffractive, bifocal hybrid (diffractive - refractive) or monofocal\]
* Fluency in written and verbal Greek language
* No severe cognitive impairment
Exclusion Criteria
* Glaucoma
* Intraocular pressure-lowering medications
* Corneal pathology
* Fundus pathology
* Diabetes mellitus
* Autoimmune diseases
* Former incisional eye surgery
* Posterior capsule rupture or lens misalignment
* Neurological, psychiatric or mental diseases that interfere with visual acuity and reading process
* Inability to understand the objectives of the study
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Democritus University of Thrace
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Georgios Labiris
Professor (Associate) of Democritus University of Thrace
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Georgios Labiris
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis
Alexandroupoli, Evros, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Labiris G, Panagiotopoulou EK, Ntonti P. Development and Validation of a Lighting Facility for the Objective Assessment of the Visual Performance of Presbyopic Patients in a Series of Activities of Daily Living. Cureus. 2022 Apr 28;14(4):e24548. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24548. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Labiris G, Panagiotopoulou EK, Taliantzis S, Perente A, Delibasis K, Doulos LT. Lighting Standards Revisited: Introduction of a Mathematical Model for the Assessment of the Impact of Illuminance on Visual Acuity. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 28;15:4553-4564. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S326139. eCollection 2021.
Labiris G, Panagiotopoulou EK, Duzha E, Tzinava M, Perente A, Konstantinidis A, Delibasis K. Development and Validation of a Web-Based Reading Test for Normal and Low Vision Patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 22;15:3915-3929. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S314943. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ES1/Th1/08-02-2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.