Comparison of Standard rapi̇d Sequential Intubation Protocol With Rocuronium in Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT05343702

Last Updated: 2023-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-15

Study Completion Date

2022-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Airway management and advanced airway management are the issues that are applied every day in emergency services and that the emergency physician should know best. Rapid sequential intubation is one of the most frequently used techniques in advanced airway management. However, anesthetic agents and paralytic agents have some concerns with some side effects. In our study, This study aimed to compare the effect of standard rapid sequential intubation protocol and application of rocuronium priming technique on the procedure time and hemodynamic profile.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective, observational and randomized study conducted between 15.07.2021 and 01.12.2021 in Ankara City Hospital Emergency Medicine Clinic, which is a third-level emergency department with approximately 450,000 patient admissions per year. Patients who applied to the emergency department and needed rapid sequential intubation were included in our study. Randomization was done according to the order of arrival of the cases. The demographic characteristics of the patients included in the study and the presence of diabetes mellitus were recorded. Routine rapid sequential intubation was performed in the standard group. In the priming group, 10% of the rocuronium dose was administered approximately 3 minutes before the induction agent. Intubation time, amount of drug used, vital signs before and after intubation, and end tidal carbon dioxide level to confirm intubation were recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation Rocuronium

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

standard

standard rapid sequence intubation group (paralysis following induction)

No interventions assigned to this group

priming

group primed with rocuronium before induction

priming with rocuronium

Intervention Type DRUG

Following induction (paralysis after onset of the induction effect) in routine rapid sequence intubation protocols While paralysis is applied, it is aimed to shorten the half-life of rocuronium by administering a subparalytic dose of rocuronium approximately 3-5 minutes before induction in the priming technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

priming with rocuronium

Following induction (paralysis after onset of the induction effect) in routine rapid sequence intubation protocols While paralysis is applied, it is aimed to shorten the half-life of rocuronium by administering a subparalytic dose of rocuronium approximately 3-5 minutes before induction in the priming technique

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be over the age of 18
* Need for advanced airway
* To give consent or consent to participate in the study consent of relatives of those who are unable to give

Exclusion Criteria

* Have an indication of a crush (rescue) airway
* Have one of the difficult airway predictor Look, Evaluate, Obstruction, Neck mobility criteria
* maxillofacial anomaly or trauma
* detected during laryngoscopy with a cormack-lehane score of 3 and 4 patients
* Those who have inconveniences in applying ketamine to the clinic of the patient
* with a rocuronium or ketamine allergy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nurullah İshak Işık

emergency medicine specialist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

NURULLAH İSHAK IŞIK, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara Bilkent Şehir Hastanesi

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Isik NI, Ozhasenekler A, Yildirim C, Sener A, Kahraman FA, Gunaydin GP. Comparison of rocuronium priming vs. standard rapid sequence intubation technique in emergency department patients requiring intubation. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Apr 22;70(3):e20231029. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231029. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38655998 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

nısık

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safety of Remifentanil Infusion
NCT01303627 COMPLETED PHASE4
Ketamine Versus Propofol as ICU Sedation
NCT06243822 COMPLETED PHASE4