The Effects of Lidocaine and Esmolol on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation
NCT ID: NCT03612492
Last Updated: 2019-05-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Esmolol on the Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Extubation
NCT04264286
The Effects of Lidocaine and Magnesium Sulphate on the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Tracheal Intubation
NCT02359370
Intravenous Lidocaine to Supress of Cough Reflex During Anesthesia Emergence
NCT03805282
The Effect-site Concentration of Remifentanil Blunting Endotracheal Intubation Responses During Anesthesia Induction With Lidocaine or Sufentanil Combined With Etomidate: A Randomized Controlled Study
NCT07089173
Ketamine Versus Etomidate During Rapid Sequence Intubation: Consequences on Hospital Morbidity
NCT00440102
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To compare the hemodynamic response during laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation using continuous infusion of lidocaine and esmolol.
Methods: Randomized, double masked clinical trial aims to compare the effect of esmolol and lidocaine on orotracheal intubation. All patients will receive balanced general anesthesia. One group (EG) will receive bolus esmolol of 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1mg / kg / min. The lidocaine (LG) group will receive lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.5mg / kg / h.
Data on hemodynamic changes, reaction to laryngoscopy, conditions at intubation and adverse events will be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Esmolol Group
Patients will receive esmolol during induction of anesthesia
Esmolol
Esmolol group (EG) will receive a bolus of esmolol 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1mg / kg / min.
Lidocaine
Lidocaine (LG) group will received lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.5mg / kg / h.
Lidocaine Group
Patients will receive lidocaine during induction of anesthesia
Esmolol
Esmolol group (EG) will receive a bolus of esmolol 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1mg / kg / min.
Lidocaine
Lidocaine (LG) group will received lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.5mg / kg / h.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Esmolol
Esmolol group (EG) will receive a bolus of esmolol 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 0.1mg / kg / min.
Lidocaine
Lidocaine (LG) group will received lidocaine bolus of 1.5mg / kg in 10 min following by continuous infusion at a rate of 1.5mg / kg / h.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Physical State 1, 2 or 3 of the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA)
* Electively or urgently scheduled for surgery requiring general anesthesia, with programming of orotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy at the Base Hospital of the Federal District.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with contraindications or history of hypersensitivity to the drugs involved in the study
* Patients with coronary ischemic disease
* Patients with atrioventricular block at any grade
* Patients with diagnosed cardiac arrhythmias
* Patients with heart failure
* Patients who are beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers
* Patients with renal insufficiency of any kind
* Patients with difficulty predicting orotracheal intubation
* Patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg / m²
* Patients who underwent neuroaxis block before anesthetic induction
* Patients who refuse to participate in the study after submitting the informed consent form
* Patients requiring two or more attempts of laryngoscopy for positioning of the orotracheal tube
* Patients with asthma
* Any other condition that, in the opinion of the researcher, may pose a risk to the patient or interfere with the objectives of the study
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Base
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fabricio Tavares Mendonca
Preceptor of Medical Residency in Anesthesiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal
Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Singh S, Laing EF, Owiredu WK, Singh A. Comparison of esmolol and lidocaine for attenuation of cardiovascular stress response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in a Ghanaian population. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Jan-Apr;7(1):83-8. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.114008.
Mendonca FT, de Queiroz LM, Guimaraes CC, Xavier AC. Effects of lidocaine and magnesium sulfate in attenuating hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation: single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;67(1):50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.004. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Esmolol vs Lidocaine on OTI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.