Effect of Nebulized Lidocaine on the Quality of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion

NCT ID: NCT03361397

Last Updated: 2017-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-30

Study Completion Date

2018-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary outcome of this study will be the effect of lidocaine nebulization before LMA insertion on LMA insertion score (within 1 minute of LMA insertion) in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.

The secondary outcome measures are the effect of LMA insertion on heart rate, arterial blood pressure, SpO2, the first time insertion rate of the LMA, and postoperative complications during LMA removal (soft tissue trauma, coughing, and laryngospasm).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups of equal size to receive lidocaine nebulization, group L (GL) or distilled water nebulization, group W (GW/control). Randomization will be performed using GL and GW registers, which will be placed in sealed envelopes prior to study initiation and opened prior to anesthesia by a physician who will prepare the solution for nebulization and will identify it with the patient number, according to the envelope drawn. Group L patients (n = 40) will receive 10 mL lidocaine 4%, and GW patients (n = 40) will receive 10 mL distilled water (DW) by nebulizer mask 5 min prior to anesthesia. All patients will be preoxygenated with 100% oxygen for 3 minutes via mask gently placed over the face and thereafter Propofol 2.5 mg/kg slowly IV plus Fentanyl 1 µg/kg IV will be used for induction of anesthesia, and isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia in both groups.

After confirming sufficient level of anesthesia (loss of eye lash reflex and jaw relaxation), the standard technique for LMA insertion (Brain,s method) will be used in both groups. Water based jelly will be applied on the posterior surface of the LMA and pressed along the palato-pharyngeal curve using the index finger. It is finally pushed further down till resistance is felt. A size 3 LMA will be used in women and a size 4 in men. Proper placement of LMA will be confirmed with bilateral equally audible breath sounds, chest movements and square wave capnography. Patients will be allowed to breathe spontaneously after successful LMA insertion.

The overall insertion condition will be assessed via a modified three point scale consisting of six variables, which include:

Mouth opening (3: full; 2: partial; 1: none) Ease of insertion (3: easy; 2: difficult; 1: impossible) Swallowing (3: nil; 2: slight; 1: gross) Coughing or gagging (3: nil; 2: slight; 1: gross) Head or limbs movement (3: nil; 2: slight; 1: gross), and Laryngospasm (3: nil; 2: partial; 1: total). Total score Insertion condition 18 Excellent 16-17 Satisfactory \<16 Poor Any failure of insertion in both groups (defined as failure to insert the LMA after 3rd time), will be managed by endotracheal intubation.

At the end of the operation, LMA will be removed under deep anesthesia and replaced with Guedel's airway. Oxygen will be continued with a face mask until full recovery, and then the patients will be moved to the PACU.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Airway Complication of Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine nebulization

Inhalation of 10 mL nebulized lidocaine hydrochloride via mask nebulizer 5 min before laryngeal mask insertion.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine Hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine hydrochloride will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion

Distilled water nebulization

Inhalation of 10 mL of nebulized distilled water solution via mask nebulizer 5 min before laryngeal mask insertion in the preoperative period.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Distilled Water

Intervention Type DRUG

Distilled Water will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine Hydrochloride

Lidocaine hydrochloride will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion

Intervention Type DRUG

Distilled Water

Distilled Water will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Xylocaine DW

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (Age \>18 yrs)
* ASA grade 1\&2
* Scheduled to undergo various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia using LMA.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients requiring endotracheal intubation
* Heavy smokers
* Grossly obese patients (Body mass index \>35 kg/m2)
* Patients with suspected difficult airway (Mallampati Grade III or IV)
* Hypersensitivity to the used drugs
* Significant cardiovascular
* Significant pulmonary disease
* liver disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed galal aly

Assistant professor of anesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed Aly, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 00201062011126

Email: [email protected]

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gupta A, Kaur S, Attri JP, Saini N. Comparative evaluation of ketamine - propofol, fentanyl - propofol and butorphanol-propofol on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):74-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21804711 (View on PubMed)

Williams KA, Barker GL, Harwood RJ, Woodall NM. Combined nebulization and spray-as-you-go topical local anaesthesia of the airway. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;95(4):549-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei202. Epub 2005 Aug 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16126785 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17100246

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id