Effect of Nebulized Lidocaine on the Quality of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion
NCT ID: NCT03361397
Last Updated: 2017-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-30
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The secondary outcome measures are the effect of LMA insertion on heart rate, arterial blood pressure, SpO2, the first time insertion rate of the LMA, and postoperative complications during LMA removal (soft tissue trauma, coughing, and laryngospasm).
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After confirming sufficient level of anesthesia (loss of eye lash reflex and jaw relaxation), the standard technique for LMA insertion (Brain,s method) will be used in both groups. Water based jelly will be applied on the posterior surface of the LMA and pressed along the palato-pharyngeal curve using the index finger. It is finally pushed further down till resistance is felt. A size 3 LMA will be used in women and a size 4 in men. Proper placement of LMA will be confirmed with bilateral equally audible breath sounds, chest movements and square wave capnography. Patients will be allowed to breathe spontaneously after successful LMA insertion.
The overall insertion condition will be assessed via a modified three point scale consisting of six variables, which include:
Mouth opening (3: full; 2: partial; 1: none) Ease of insertion (3: easy; 2: difficult; 1: impossible) Swallowing (3: nil; 2: slight; 1: gross) Coughing or gagging (3: nil; 2: slight; 1: gross) Head or limbs movement (3: nil; 2: slight; 1: gross), and Laryngospasm (3: nil; 2: partial; 1: total). Total score Insertion condition 18 Excellent 16-17 Satisfactory \<16 Poor Any failure of insertion in both groups (defined as failure to insert the LMA after 3rd time), will be managed by endotracheal intubation.
At the end of the operation, LMA will be removed under deep anesthesia and replaced with Guedel's airway. Oxygen will be continued with a face mask until full recovery, and then the patients will be moved to the PACU.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lidocaine nebulization
Inhalation of 10 mL nebulized lidocaine hydrochloride via mask nebulizer 5 min before laryngeal mask insertion.
Lidocaine Hydrochloride
Lidocaine hydrochloride will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion
Distilled water nebulization
Inhalation of 10 mL of nebulized distilled water solution via mask nebulizer 5 min before laryngeal mask insertion in the preoperative period.
Distilled Water
Distilled Water will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine Hydrochloride
Lidocaine hydrochloride will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion
Distilled Water
Distilled Water will be used via mask nebulizer before LMA insertion
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA grade 1\&2
* Scheduled to undergo various elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia using LMA.
Exclusion Criteria
* Heavy smokers
* Grossly obese patients (Body mass index \>35 kg/m2)
* Patients with suspected difficult airway (Mallampati Grade III or IV)
* Hypersensitivity to the used drugs
* Significant cardiovascular
* Significant pulmonary disease
* liver disease.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed galal aly
Assistant professor of anesthesia
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gupta A, Kaur S, Attri JP, Saini N. Comparative evaluation of ketamine - propofol, fentanyl - propofol and butorphanol-propofol on haemodynamics and laryngeal mask airway insertion conditions. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;27(1):74-8.
Williams KA, Barker GL, Harwood RJ, Woodall NM. Combined nebulization and spray-as-you-go topical local anaesthesia of the airway. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;95(4):549-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei202. Epub 2005 Aug 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17100246
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id