Comparison on Succinylcholine Onset Time Assessed by Train of Four Stimulation Versus Clinical Judgment During Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia
NCT ID: NCT03415607
Last Updated: 2018-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
110 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-11-06
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The data available on onset duration of this drug are old and bases on only few studies, but the succinylcholine if sometime harmful (anaphylaxis , cardiac arrest, bronchospasm).
The investigators want to assess the onset time of succinylcholine with an objective toll , the train of four stimulation, and evaluate if the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist is reliable to predict an adequate moment for endotracheal intubation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Methods to Facilitate Rapid Sequence Intubation
NCT01479751
Prospective Study of Induction Medications Used in the Trauma RSI
NCT04291521
Three Different Doses of Neostigmine on the Reversal of Cisatracurium-induced Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade
NCT05037006
Assessment of Remifentanil for Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation in Full Stomach Patient Compared to Muscle Relaxant
NCT03960801
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Remifentanil in a Rapid Sequence Induction for Fragile Subjects
NCT01259648
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant woman
* Nasotracheal intubation
* Monitoring of train of four at the adductor pollis impossible (such as patient with no arm )
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Caen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clément Buléon
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Caen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Caen
Caen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CELOTOF
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.