Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
106 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Coping Skills and Heart Failure: Outcomes and Mechanisms
NCT00873418
Congestive Heart Failure Outreach Program
NCT00371085
Telephone Intervention in Heart Failure Patients
NCT00057057
Building Skill in Heart Failure Self-care: A Community Based Intervention
NCT01894750
Helping Others Toward Positive Emotions in People With Heart Failure
NCT01275742
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The target recruitment size was 90 participants based upon attrition rates reported in previous studies (35%) and the number of participants needed to provide trend data in preparation for a larger, more adequately powered clinical trial. Following verbal informed consent, all participants were screened for cognitive impairment using the 6 Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT) prior to baseline data collection. Data were collected using the following instruments: a Sociodemographic and Clinical Survey (baseline only), the Self-Care of HF Index (SCHFI; v. 6.2), the Heart Failure Symptom Survey (HFSS), the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12 (ISEL-12), the Social Problem-Solving Inventory Revised (SPSIR), Healthcare Utilization Survey, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD), the Family APGAR.
Participants randomized to the intervention group participated in a telephone-based support and problem-solving training intervention over 12 weeks (Weeks 1-4, 6, 8, 10, 12).
Participants randomized to the attention group received usual care plus telephone calls on the same schedule as the intervention group and consisted of a health check with information collected regarding recent healthcare usage.
Participants randomized to the control group received usual care from their healthcare providers and received heart failure self-care education upon discharge from the healthcare facility.
Follow-up data collection occurred at weeks 5, 9, 11, 13. All data were self-report and collected by a trained research assistant who collected study data over the telephone and marked participants answers on a computerized data spreadsheet. Data were analyzed using linear and multi-level modeling approaches.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
COPE-HF Partnership Intervention
Working with a trained registered nurse interventionist, participants in this arm were trained to use a 4-step problem-solving process to manage identified problems related to heart failure. Heart failure self-care education and materials were provided as indicated based on specific identified problems.
COPE-HF Partnership Intervention
Participants were trained to use a 4-step problem-solving process based on the Theory of Social Problem-Solving (TSPS) to manage HF-related problems experienced in the home over 12-weeks. The core belief of TSPS is effective problem-solving requires a positive problem orientation (i.e., viewing problems as a challenge versus a threat) and elicits rational problem-solving versus avoidance or impulsivity/carelessness. Problem-solving follows from a positive problem orientation and involves accurate problem identification, generation of appropriate potential solutions, active decision-making, and solution implementation and evaluation. The goal of this intervention was to move HF patients toward a positive problem orientation and use of rational problem-solving strategies that support greater HF self-care and reduce depression. The COPE-HF Partnership Intervention consisted of 1 home visit and 7 follow-up telehealth sessions led by a registered nurse interventionist.
Attention
Participants in this arm received telephone calls from a trained research assistant on the same schedule as the intervention group. During these calls basic data were collected on several key areas of heart failure self-care. No intervention or patient education took place during these calls.
Attention
Participants in the attention group received a sham intervention that consisted of scheduled telephone calls consistent with the timing of that received by the intervention group. During these calls, basic information was gathered on key areas of heart failure self-care management and the frequency of healthcare usage. No intervention or education was provided.
Usual Care
Participants in this arm received usual care from their healthcare providers and facility designated heart failure discharge education only.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
COPE-HF Partnership Intervention
Participants were trained to use a 4-step problem-solving process based on the Theory of Social Problem-Solving (TSPS) to manage HF-related problems experienced in the home over 12-weeks. The core belief of TSPS is effective problem-solving requires a positive problem orientation (i.e., viewing problems as a challenge versus a threat) and elicits rational problem-solving versus avoidance or impulsivity/carelessness. Problem-solving follows from a positive problem orientation and involves accurate problem identification, generation of appropriate potential solutions, active decision-making, and solution implementation and evaluation. The goal of this intervention was to move HF patients toward a positive problem orientation and use of rational problem-solving strategies that support greater HF self-care and reduce depression. The COPE-HF Partnership Intervention consisted of 1 home visit and 7 follow-up telehealth sessions led by a registered nurse interventionist.
Attention
Participants in the attention group received a sham intervention that consisted of scheduled telephone calls consistent with the timing of that received by the intervention group. During these calls, basic information was gathered on key areas of heart failure self-care management and the frequency of healthcare usage. No intervention or education was provided.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Undergoing medical treatment for HF
3. BNP \>100
4. Able to read, speak, and understand English
5. Reliable telephone access
6. Live within 100 miles of acute care facility
Exclusion Criteria
2. Reduced life expectancy \< 12 months
3. History of cognitive impairment or a score \>8 on the 6CIT
4. Inability to provide informed consent
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Nurse Pracititioner Foundation (ANPF)
UNKNOWN
Florida State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lucinda Graven
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lucinda J Graven, PhD APRN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Florida State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Capital Regional Medical Center
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015.14571
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.