IV Dexmedetomidine in the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: Double Blind Randomized Trial.
NCT ID: NCT05335655
Last Updated: 2022-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-31
2022-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ED50 of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 12.5 mg for Spinal Anesthesia in Hip and Knee Surgery: An Up-and-Down Method Approach
NCT07144215
Effect of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Bilateral Erector Spinae Block on Postoperative Pain and Diaphragmatic Function After Pediatric Cardiac Surgeries : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT05536063
Adding Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine for Bilateral Erector Spinae Block
NCT06231979
The Effect of Dexamethasone on the Duration and Functionality of Bupivacaine Intercostal Nerve Blockade
NCT02005575
Dexmedetomidine and Morphine as Adjuvants to US Guided Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Elective Thoracic Surgeries
NCT05843344
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Bupivacaine is one of the most used local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia, with high protein binding and a slow onset because of it relatively elevated pKa. The standard doses for clinical practice make it appropriate for surgical procedures that take 2.5 to 3 hours. The administration of complementary drugs such as dexmedetomidine altogether with the local anesthetic allows a reduction in the dosage, as well as in the requirements for analgesics and sedative drugs along the procedure and through the first hours of the postoperative period.
Dexmedetomidine properly carries its mechanism of action in the pre and post synaptic alpha-2 receptors along the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, decreasing the release of neurotransmitters and thus the pulsatile transmission of impulses. On the other hand, when administered as an IV infusion, this alpha agonist has shown the ability to reach light sedation levels, easily reversed by verbal or tactile stimulus. When acting at the locus coeruleus presynaptic spots, the effect of trans and postoperative analgesia can also be consistently observed. Because of these characteristics, the benefits of intravenous dexmedetomidine have been recently tested over the length and quality of spinal anesthesia with local anesthetics, by being administered as bolus and then as maintenance infusion at variable doses per kilogram.
This therapeutic alternative has been applied during several types of infraumbilical surgeries, such as varicocelectomy, hernioplasty, orchiectomy, and lower limb interventions, without the risk of producing nausea, vomiting, headache, or shivering. The use of this adjuvant provides longer lasting nervous blockade, as well higher time for postoperative analgesia, which helps to reduce the consumption of sedative drugs and opioids since the beginning of the intervention until up to the following first 24 hours. Finally, the undesired effects that have been reported in some populations when receiving this drug (hypotension and bradycardia), appear unfrequently and can be easily reversed with the use of common prescription hemodynamic drugs (atropine, ephedrine).
However, it is common to observe differing therapeutic responses following drug administration during daily clinical practice, which can be often attributed to interindividual differences in drug pharmacokinetics, linked to race, ethnicity, and social habits, that can develop enzymatic variations or genetic polymorphisms. Currently, there are many bibliographic references that support the theories that punctually describe these changes in pharmacological responses between ethnic groups, which is why there is a constant need for testing the efficacy and safety of certain drugs, to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes in all the medical fields.
In this case, the objective of our trial is to evaluate the clinical response to the therapeutic scheme based on intravenous dexmedetomidine added to spinal anesthesia. We expect to determine if this drug could and should be considered regularly as an adjuvant to prolong the duration and improve the anesthetic and analgesic conditions of neuraxial blockade with intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic lower limb surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
IV bolus of dexmedetomidine, blindly administered and tittered to 0.5mcg per kilogram (real weight), diluted in 10 ml of 0.9% saline solution during 15 minutes before the spinal block. Once the anesthetic effect is confirmed, the maintenance IV infusion, based on dexmedetomidine 100 mcg diluted in 100 ml of 0.9% saline solution tittered at 0.5 mcg per kilogram per hour (real weight), begins.
Dexmedetomidine injection
IV initial bolus and trans operative dexmedetomidine infusion.
Group B
IV 10 ml initial bolus of 0.9% saline solution during the 15 minutes before the spinal block. Once de anesthetic effect is confirmed, the maintenance infusion of IV 0.9% saline solution (100 ml in equivalent dosage per hour) begins.
Sodium Chloride 0.9% infusion
IV initial bolus and trans operative infusion of 0.9% saline solution.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dexmedetomidine injection
IV initial bolus and trans operative dexmedetomidine infusion.
Sodium Chloride 0.9% infusion
IV initial bolus and trans operative infusion of 0.9% saline solution.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Male or female
* ASA classified I or II
* Undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic surgery
* Neuraxial anesthesia with 10 mg of spinal bupivacaine (2ml at 0.5%)
* Inert epidural catheter
Exclusion Criteria
* Basal mean arterial pressure (MAP) lower than 65 mmHg
* Non-compensated heart disease
* Sinus bradycardia
* Drug allergy or intolerance
* Contraindication for neuraxial blockade
* Coagulopathy
* Lumbar structural pathology and/or vertebral instrumentation
* Local active infection at punction site
* Thrombocytopenia (lower than 80 K platelets)
* Non-controlled psychiatric disease
* Patients that receive drugs such as NSAIDs, acetaminophen and/or opioids within less than 3 hours prior to the procedure
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Liliana Serrano Ibarrola
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juan Francisco Hernández Sierra, M in C
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto
San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Juan Francisco Hernández Sierra, M in C
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24-CEI-001-20160427
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.