IV Dexmedetomidine in the Duration of Spinal Anesthesia With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine: Double Blind Randomized Trial.

NCT ID: NCT05335655

Last Updated: 2022-06-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-31

Study Completion Date

2022-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia produces sensitive and motor block according to the administered local anesthetic. The total duration of surgical anesthesia depends on the dose, intrinsic properties of the anesthetic, and the use of additional drugs. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist that has sedative and analgesic effects. The specific action site in the spinal cord receptors and in the locus coeruleus provide as well hypnotic and sympatholytic characteristics. The combination of spinal anesthesia and intravenous dexmedetomidine is a safe option for hemodynamically stable patients undergoing elective surgery. Material and methods: Double blind randomized trial. The objective is to time and compare the total duration of neuraxial blockade with spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine plus intravenous dexmedetomidine, against hyperbaric bupivacaine by itself. 60 patients shall be included, between the ages of 18 and 65 years, classified by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II, undergoing lower limb elective orthopedic procedure, with spinal anesthesia plus epidural catheter. 50% of the patients (group A) will receive spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine and IV dexmedetomidine at 0.5 mcg/kg (real weight), and the other 50% (group B) will receive spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine plus IV 0.9% saline solution in equivalent volume.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neuraxial blockade is produced by interrupting nervous impulse transmission with the administration of a local anesthetic. When the drug in injected directly into the subarachnoid space, it passes through the pia mater and enters the Virchow-Robin orifices all the way to the nerve ganglion of the deepest dorsal roots. This nerve endings are highly accessible and easily anesthetized, even with a low dose of local anesthetic, in comparison with the extradural nerves. The speed of the spinal blockade depends on the size, surface, and degree of myelination of the fibers exposed to the anesthetic. However, the regression or termination of the desired effect appears because of the decrease in drug concentration within the cerebrospinal fluid, which happens when the blood vessels inside the pia mater absorb the substances into the systemic circulation to be metabolized and excreted. The rate of elimination depends on the distribution of local anesthetic; while the diffusion surface is larger, the drug exposure to the vessels increases, and thus the time of action will be shorter.

Bupivacaine is one of the most used local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia, with high protein binding and a slow onset because of it relatively elevated pKa. The standard doses for clinical practice make it appropriate for surgical procedures that take 2.5 to 3 hours. The administration of complementary drugs such as dexmedetomidine altogether with the local anesthetic allows a reduction in the dosage, as well as in the requirements for analgesics and sedative drugs along the procedure and through the first hours of the postoperative period.

Dexmedetomidine properly carries its mechanism of action in the pre and post synaptic alpha-2 receptors along the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, decreasing the release of neurotransmitters and thus the pulsatile transmission of impulses. On the other hand, when administered as an IV infusion, this alpha agonist has shown the ability to reach light sedation levels, easily reversed by verbal or tactile stimulus. When acting at the locus coeruleus presynaptic spots, the effect of trans and postoperative analgesia can also be consistently observed. Because of these characteristics, the benefits of intravenous dexmedetomidine have been recently tested over the length and quality of spinal anesthesia with local anesthetics, by being administered as bolus and then as maintenance infusion at variable doses per kilogram.

This therapeutic alternative has been applied during several types of infraumbilical surgeries, such as varicocelectomy, hernioplasty, orchiectomy, and lower limb interventions, without the risk of producing nausea, vomiting, headache, or shivering. The use of this adjuvant provides longer lasting nervous blockade, as well higher time for postoperative analgesia, which helps to reduce the consumption of sedative drugs and opioids since the beginning of the intervention until up to the following first 24 hours. Finally, the undesired effects that have been reported in some populations when receiving this drug (hypotension and bradycardia), appear unfrequently and can be easily reversed with the use of common prescription hemodynamic drugs (atropine, ephedrine).

However, it is common to observe differing therapeutic responses following drug administration during daily clinical practice, which can be often attributed to interindividual differences in drug pharmacokinetics, linked to race, ethnicity, and social habits, that can develop enzymatic variations or genetic polymorphisms. Currently, there are many bibliographic references that support the theories that punctually describe these changes in pharmacological responses between ethnic groups, which is why there is a constant need for testing the efficacy and safety of certain drugs, to improve patient safety and clinical outcomes in all the medical fields.

In this case, the objective of our trial is to evaluate the clinical response to the therapeutic scheme based on intravenous dexmedetomidine added to spinal anesthesia. We expect to determine if this drug could and should be considered regularly as an adjuvant to prolong the duration and improve the anesthetic and analgesic conditions of neuraxial blockade with intrathecal bupivacaine in orthopedic lower limb surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Dexmedetomidine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
Each patient is assigned to one of the two treatment groups (A of B) according to a computer-generated chart of random numbers. Under standard preanesthetic procedures (non-invasive monitoring, premedication), we blindly administer an IV bolus of dexmedetomidine tittered to 0.5mcg per kilogram (real weight), diluted in 10 ml of 0.9% saline solution during 15 minutes before the spinal block. Once the anesthetic effect is confirmed, we begin a maintenance IV infusion for group A, based on dexmedetomidine 100 mcg diluted in 100 ml of 0.9% saline solution tittered at 0.5 mcg per kilogram per hour (real weight). On the other hand, for group B, we administer the same volume (10 ml) of IV 0.9% saline solution for the initial bolus, and for the maintenance infusion we keep equivalent organoleptic characteristics of simple intravenous 0.9% saline solution as well.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

IV bolus of dexmedetomidine, blindly administered and tittered to 0.5mcg per kilogram (real weight), diluted in 10 ml of 0.9% saline solution during 15 minutes before the spinal block. Once the anesthetic effect is confirmed, the maintenance IV infusion, based on dexmedetomidine 100 mcg diluted in 100 ml of 0.9% saline solution tittered at 0.5 mcg per kilogram per hour (real weight), begins.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

IV initial bolus and trans operative dexmedetomidine infusion.

Group B

IV 10 ml initial bolus of 0.9% saline solution during the 15 minutes before the spinal block. Once de anesthetic effect is confirmed, the maintenance infusion of IV 0.9% saline solution (100 ml in equivalent dosage per hour) begins.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Sodium Chloride 0.9% infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

IV initial bolus and trans operative infusion of 0.9% saline solution.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine injection

IV initial bolus and trans operative dexmedetomidine infusion.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sodium Chloride 0.9% infusion

IV initial bolus and trans operative infusion of 0.9% saline solution.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Precedex infusion Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Previously accepted and signed informed consent.
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Male or female
* ASA classified I or II
* Undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic surgery
* Neuraxial anesthesia with 10 mg of spinal bupivacaine (2ml at 0.5%)
* Inert epidural catheter

Exclusion Criteria

* Basal heart rate lower than 55 beats per minute
* Basal mean arterial pressure (MAP) lower than 65 mmHg
* Non-compensated heart disease
* Sinus bradycardia
* Drug allergy or intolerance
* Contraindication for neuraxial blockade

* Coagulopathy
* Lumbar structural pathology and/or vertebral instrumentation
* Local active infection at punction site
* Thrombocytopenia (lower than 80 K platelets)
* Non-controlled psychiatric disease
* Patients that receive drugs such as NSAIDs, acetaminophen and/or opioids within less than 3 hours prior to the procedure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Liliana Serrano Ibarrola

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Juan Francisco Hernández Sierra, M in C

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto

San Luis Potosí City, , Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Liliana Serrano Ibarrola, MD

Role: CONTACT

+52 3313270064

Juan Francisco Hernández Sierra, M in C

Role: CONTACT

+52 4443082889

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Liliana Serrano Ibarrola, MD

Role: primary

+52 3313270064

Juan Francisco Hernández Sierra, M in C

Role: backup

+52 4443082889

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-CEI-001-20160427

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.