Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
283 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-04-10
2023-09-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is now well established that the quality of the reduction obtained is an important predictive factor of the postoperative outcome in patients with displaced acetabular fractures. Obtaining an anatomical reduction, at least satisfactory, is not always easy, even in trained teams. Indeed, it can be difficult because of the structural environment. This is due to the proximity of the acetabulum to the vasculo-nervous elements, but also to the complexity of the fracture itself. The contribution of new technologies appear to be important tools to achieve this objective. Indeed, investigators have demonstrated that the use of the O-ARM imaging system (Medtronic®, Sofamor, Memphis, TN) allowed the improvement of their results.
Although they occur more frequently in the elderly population, the average incidence is maintained in the 20-59 age group. In these young populations, the fracture occurs most frequently as a result of a high-energy mechanism (road accident, more exceptionally, during a sporting activity). These patients, in the prime of their lives, are often athletic. The desire to resume sports after surgery is a powerful motivating factor for these patients. Often, it is the primary measure of surgical success from the athlete's perspective. In a previous work, Giannoudis et al. reported a 42% rate of return to activity at the previous level. The quality of the surgery is associated with the possibility of resuming sports activity after the procedure.
Thus, the objective of this work is to determine the results of acetabular surgery in a population of previously athletic patients, in particular the return to athletic performance.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
New, Easy and Efficient Ways to CLassify AcetabulaR Fractures
NCT03316235
A New Decisional Tree for the Management of Acetabular Fractures : Monocentric Observational Study
NCT06338228
Predictors of the Quality of Surgical Reduction and Long-term Outcome
NCT04741347
Postoperative Score Predictive of the Prognosis of Acetabular Fractures
NCT04626388
Current Incidence and Treatments Performed of Fractures of the Acetabulum and Pelvis in France in 2013
NCT02848924
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with an isolated acetabulum fracture
* Patients with intraoperative management with O-Arm
* Patients with at least 2 years of follow-up
* French-speaking patients
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of associated fractures
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score ≥ 3
* Absence of pre- and postoperative CT scans available on PACS
* Patients under guardianship or curatorship
* Patients deprived of liberty
* Patients under court protection
* Patients objecting to participation in the study
* Low preoperative physical activity (= UCLA Activity Score ≤ 5)
* Unsatisfactory criteria for surgical reduction on CT scan
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guillaume RIOUALLON, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lundin N, Huttunen TT, Berg HE, Marcano A, Fellander-Tsai L, Enocson A. Increasing incidence of pelvic and acetabular fractures. A nationwide study of 87,308 fractures over a 16-year period in Sweden. Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6):1410-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.013. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM. Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):1559-67. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00444.
Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jan;87(1):2-9.
Ziran N, Soles GLS, Matta JM. Outcomes after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2019 Mar 16;13:16. doi: 10.1186/s13037-019-0196-2. eCollection 2019.
Rizkallah M, Sebaaly A, Melhem E, Moreau PE, Upex P, Jouffroy P, Riouallon G. Clinical impact of intraoperative cone beam tomography and navigation for displaced acetabular fractures: a comparative study at medium-term follow-up. Int Orthop. 2021 Jul;45(7):1837-1844. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05076-4. Epub 2021 May 22.
Melhem E, Riouallon G, Habboubi K, Gabbas M, Jouffroy P. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular fractures in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep;106(5):831-839. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.11.019. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Doege J, Ayres JM, Mackay MJ, Tarakemeh A, Brown SM, Vopat BG, Mulcahey MK. Defining Return to Sport: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jul 26;9(7):23259671211009589. doi: 10.1177/23259671211009589. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Fracture&Sport
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.