Function Outcome of Impaction Injuries in Acetabular Fractures
NCT ID: NCT03152266
Last Updated: 2022-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-01
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Acetabular Fractures in Elderly Patients
NCT03929536
Mid-Term Outcomes Of Fracture Odontoid Management in Assiut University
NCT05842694
Retrospective Evaluation of Total Hip Replacement After Acetabular Fractures
NCT02892240
Analysis of the Posterior Wall Fracture of the Acetabulum
NCT03636646
Short Term Outcomes of Fracture Odontoid Management
NCT05042596
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention. Observational study
Follow up of the function of the hip after reduction of the impacted fragment which associated with acetabular fractures
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pure impaction without cortical interruption
* Closed fractures.
* Skeletally mature (adults and elderly).
Exclusion Criteria
* Pathological fractures .
* Associated proximal Hip fractures.
* Open acetabular Fractures.
* Fractures more than 3 weeks
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bahaaeldin Mohamed Abdelhafez
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut faculty of medicine
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Martins e Souza P, Giordano V, Goldsztajn F, Siciliano AA, Grizendi JA, Dias MV. Marginal impaction in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):W470-4. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12451.
Wu XB, Wang MY, Zhu SW, Cao QY, Wu HH. [Marginal impaction in acetabular fractures]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Apr;41(4):289-91. Chinese.
Leucht P, Castillo AB, Bellino MJ. Comparison of tricalcium phosphate cement and cancellous autograft as bone void filler in acetabular fractures with marginal impaction. Injury. 2013 Jul;44(7):969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 May 14.
Moed BR, WillsonCarr SE, Watson JT. Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 May;84(5):752-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200205000-00008.
Bhandari M, Matta J, Ferguson T, Matthys G. Predictors of clinical and radiological outcome in patients with fractures of the acetabulum and concomitant posterior dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Dec;88(12):1618-24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.17309.
Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Delli Sante E, Morell DJ, Stengel D, Prevezas N. Acetabular fractures with marginal impaction: mid-term results. Bone Joint J. 2013 Feb;95-B(2):230-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30548.
Moed BR, Yu PH, Gruson KI. Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1879-83. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200310000-00002.
Ugino FK, Righetti CM, Alves DP, Guimaraes RP, Honda EK, Ono NK. Evaluation of the reliability of the modified Merle d'Aubigne and Postel Method. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(4):213-7. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000400004.
Kreder HJ, Rozen N, Borkhoff CM, Laflamme YG, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Stephen DJ. Determinants of functional outcome after simple and complex acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):776-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17342.
Manson T, Schmidt AH. Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly: A Critical Analysis Review. JBJS Rev. 2016 Oct 4;4(10):e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00090.
Gansslen A, Hildebrand F, Kretek C. Transverse + posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum: epidemiology, operative management and long-term results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(1):27-33.
Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis C, Papathanassopoulos A, Obakponovwe O, Roberts C. Articular step-off and risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Evidence today. Injury. 2010 Oct;41(10):986-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.003.
Zhuang Y, Lei JL, Wei X, Lu DG, Zhang K. Surgical treatment of acetabulum top compression fracture with sea gull sign. Orthop Surg. 2015 May;7(2):146-54. doi: 10.1111/os.12175.
Bertrand R, Derancourt J, Kassab R. Molecular movements in the actomyosin complex: F-actin-promoted internal cross-linking of the 25- and 20-kDa heavy chain fragments of skeletal myosin subfragment. Biochemistry. 1992 Dec 8;31(48):12219-26. doi: 10.1021/bi00163a035.
Laflamme GY, Hebert-Davies J. Direct reduction technique for superomedial dome impaction in geriatric acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Feb;28(2):e39-43. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318298ef0a.
Tosounidis TH, Stengel D, Giannoudis PV. Anteromedial dome impaction in acetabular fractures: Issues and controversies. Injury. 2016 Aug;47(8):1605-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.020. No abstract available.
Scolaro JA, Routt ML Jr. Reduction of osteoarticular acetabular dome impaction through an independent iliac cortical window. Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1959-64. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 2. No abstract available.
Collinge CA, Lebus GF. Techniques for reduction of the quadrilateral surface and dome impaction when using the anterior intrapelvic (modified Stoppa) approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Feb;29 Suppl 2:S20-4. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000271.
Jeffcoat DM, Carroll EA, Huber FG, Goldman AT, Miller AN, Lorich DG, Helfet DL. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures in an older population through a limited ilioinguinal approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May;26(5):284-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821e10a2.
Casstevens C, Archdeacon MT, d'Heurle A, Finnan R. Intrapelvic reduction and buttress screw stabilization of dome impaction of the acetabulum: a technical trick. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;28(6):e133-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000005.
Lubovsky O, Kreder M, Wright DA, Kiss A, Gallant A, Kreder HJ, Whyne CM. Quantitative measures of damage to subchondral bone are associated with functional outcome following treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. J Orthop Res. 2013 Dec;31(12):1980-5. doi: 10.1002/jor.22458. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OCIA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.