Minimal Clinically Important Changes in Osteoarthritis Treatment

NCT ID: NCT05316194

Last Updated: 2024-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

11708 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-06

Study Completion Date

2021-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess minimal clinically important change, cut-offs for treatment failure and patient acceptable symptom state for pain and patient-reported function and quality of life in persons with hip or knee osteoarthritis, participating in digitally delivered first-line education and exercise treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are consistently recommended as the primary end-point in clinical trials evaluating treatment effects in different medical conditions. For a meaningful interpretation of the PROMs used, three different approaches have been proposed; The Minimal Important Change (MIC), which is the smallest change in scores that represents an important improvement for the patient, i.e., the patient is feeling better, the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), which represents patients that consider their current status as acceptable, i.e., the patient is feeling good and Treatment Failure (TF), which represents patients that consider their state so unsatisfactory that they think the treatment has failed, all based on relevant anchor questions. Previous research in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and femoroacetabular impingement reveals that feeling better is not necessarily the same as feeling good and reporting only the MIC (or mean change) may overestimate the results, stressing the need for including different measures of improvement to evaluate treatment effects on PROMs. The MIC, PASS and TF for persons undergoing digital treatment for hip or knee osteoarthritis are not yet determined. In this retrospective register-based study we will define MIC, PASS and TF in pain and patient-reported function and quality of life, using anchor-based questions, for persons participating in digital first-line treatment for hip and knee OA. In addition, we will use these thresholds to establish the proportion of patients reaching MIC and/or PASS or reporting TF, separate for persons with hip and knee OA.

Statistical analysis:

For MIC calculations, participants will be categorized as "importantly improved" if they answered "Better an important improvement" or "Somewhat better but enough to be an important improvement" to the anchor questions for KOOS/HOOS and NRS. MIC for an important improvement will then be calculated using the predictive modeling method (MICpred), adjusting for the proportion of improved patients.

The MICpred method will also be used to calculate the post score (i.e., 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) for KOOS/HOOS-scores and NRS-scores for participants that have responded "Yes" to the PASS or TF anchor question, respectively. The proportion of participants reaching the cut-offs of MIC, PASS and TF for the KOOS/HOOS and NRS, will then be calculated separately for participants with knee and hip OA.

Subgroup analyses on the effect of sex, age and baseline symptoms (depending on data distribution to ensure we will have an adequated sample size also in subgroups) on MIC, PASS and TF will also be performed using the MICpred method

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Hip

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Participation in digital OA treatment

All participants that have participated in a digitally delivered first-line treatment program (Joint Academy) for hip or knee OA until May 2022.

Digital treatment for hip and knee osteoarthritis

Intervention Type OTHER

The program is an app-based version of the Swedish face-to-face management program for OA "Better management of patients with OsteoArthrits" and includes weekly educational sessions, individualized exercises and a possibility to chat asynchronously with a physical therapist during the entire duration of the program.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Digital treatment for hip and knee osteoarthritis

The program is an app-based version of the Swedish face-to-face management program for OA "Better management of patients with OsteoArthrits" and includes weekly educational sessions, individualized exercises and a possibility to chat asynchronously with a physical therapist during the entire duration of the program.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Data for all participants enrolled in the program until May 2022, and have given their written informed consent, will be extracted from the digital treatment register.

Inclusion criteria will be; i) diagnosed hip or knee OA ii) provided answer for KOOS/HOOS questionnaires and/or NRS pain at baseline and any of the follow-ups, i.e., 3, 6, 9 and/or 12 months.

Exclusion criteria: none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lund University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Joint Academy

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leif E Dahlberg

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Arthro Therapeutics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arthro Therapeutics

Malmo, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MIC in OA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of Comprehensive Care for Knee OA
NCT00000404 COMPLETED PHASE2