Supporting Responsible Fatherhood Program (Fatherhood FIRE)

NCT ID: NCT05311592

Last Updated: 2026-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

496 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-06-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Montefiore Medical Center (in partnership with BronxWorks) is implementing a large-scope program to promote responsible fatherhood in the Bronx among low-income adult (18 years or older) fathers with non-custodial children (under the age of 24). The program, called HERO Dads (Healthy, Empowered, Resilient, Open Dads), will promote responsible fatherhood by enhancing relationship and anger-management skills and providing marriage education; providing skills-based parenting education, disseminating information about good parenting practices, and encouraging child support payments (in partnership with our local OCSE); and fostering economic stability by providing employment-related supports inclusive of job search, vocational skills training, job referrals, and job retention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The program model is based on the premise that relationship and parenting skills can be taught, and will lead to improvements in relationships (knowledge about relationships, communication skills, stress management, reduction in destructive conflict), parenting (knowledge about child development, engagement with non-custodial children, effective parenting, co-parent communication, child well-being), and economic status (vocational skills, new employment or career advancement, financial literacy, child support). The investigator will provide core relationship and relationship education workshops using an empirically supported curriculum (24/7 Dad) plus employment workshops, numerous supplemental activities to promote responsible fatherhood, individualized vocational case management, and job-driven employment services. In total, the investigator expects to enroll 1,475 non-custodial fathers in the program and provide an average of 34 hours of total programming per participant (including 24 hours of core workshops), which the investigator believes is a sufficient dosage to detect impacts.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parenting Family Relations Father-Child Relations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The investigator will run workshops virtually, through Zoom, and in person. Participants will be randomized either to the virtual condition, or to the in person condition.

Update: Effective 1/1/2025 randomization ceased and from that date onward data participants were able to choose which arm they partook in.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

In Person

Participants will receive all services in person, including participating in the initial intake process, and attending all workshops.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HERO Dads Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The HERO Dads Program is a 4-week series of workshops for non-custodial fathers that focuses on improving parenting, offering job support, and financial counseling.

Virtual (Zoom)

Participants will complete their intake process in person, but will complete all workshops virtually through Zoom.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HERO Dads Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The HERO Dads Program is a 4-week series of workshops for non-custodial fathers that focuses on improving parenting, offering job support, and financial counseling.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HERO Dads Program

The HERO Dads Program is a 4-week series of workshops for non-custodial fathers that focuses on improving parenting, offering job support, and financial counseling.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Non-custodial fathers who are 18 years or older
* Have non-custodial children (biological, foster, adopted) under the age of 24
* Income below 200% poverty line

Exclusion Criteria

* Active intimate partner violence and increased risk of intimate partner violence
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Bureau - Administration for Children and Families

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

BronxWorks

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Scott Wetzler, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Acs, G. & Nelson, S. (2004) What do 'I do's do? Potential benefits of marriage for cohabiting couples with children." Assessing the New Federalism Policy Brief B-59. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Newton TL. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):472-503. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11439708 (View on PubMed)

Bramlett MD, Mosher WD. Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Vital Health Stat 23. 2002 Jul;(22):1-93.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12183886 (View on PubMed)

McLanahan, S., Garfinkel, I., Reichman, N. et al. (2003) The Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study: Baseline National Report. Princeton, NJ: Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Carlson MJ, McLanahan SS, Brooks-Gunn J. Coparenting and nonresident fathers' involvement with young children after a nonmarital birth. Demography. 2008 May;45(2):461-88. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18613490 (View on PubMed)

Carlson MJ, VanOrman AG, Turner KJ. Fathers' Investments of Money and Time Across Residential Contexts. J Marriage Fam. 2017 Feb;79(1):10-23. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12324. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29681652 (View on PubMed)

Amato, P. R. (2000). Consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 356 365.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Amato PR. Children of divorce in the 1990s: an update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol. 2001 Sep;15(3):355-70. doi: 10.1037//0893-3200.15.3.355.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11584788 (View on PubMed)

Amato PR, Booth A. The legacy of parents' marital discord: consequences for children's marital quality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;81(4):627-38.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11642350 (View on PubMed)

Whisman, M. A., & Uebelacker, L. A. (2003). Comorbidity of relationship distress and mental and physical health problems. In D. K. Snyder & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), Treating difficult couples (pp. 3-26). New York, NY: Guilford.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Institute for American Values (2002). Why marriage matters: Twenty-one conclusions from the social sciences.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Yoder, J., Brisson, D. & Lopez, A. (2016) Moving beyond fatherhood involvement: The association between father-child relationship quality and youth delinquency trajectories. Family Relations, 65: 462-476.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cabrera, N. & Tamis-LeMonda, C. (Eds.) (2013) Handbook of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (2nd Ed). New York, NY: Routledge

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Haskins, R. & Sawhill, I. (2003) Work and marriage: The way to end poverty and welfare. The Brookings Institution Policy Brief: Welfare Reform and Beyond #28, 1-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hawkins, A. (2019) Are federally-supported relationship education programs for lower-income individuals and couples working? A review of evaluation research. American Enterprise Institute.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hawkins, A. J., & Fackrell, T. A. (2010). Does couple education for lower-income couples work? A meta-analytic study of emerging research. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions, 9(2), 181-191.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cummings, E. & Merrilees, C. (2010) Identifying the dynamic processes underlying links between marital conflict and child adjustment. In M. Schulz, M. Pruett, P. Kerig & R. Parke (Eds.) Strengthening couple relationships for optimal child development: Lessons from research and intervention (pp. 27-40). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gottman,J.M., Coan, J. A., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 5-22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Markman, H. J., & Hahlweg, K. (1993). The prediction & prevention of marital distress: An international perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 29-43.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wetzler, S. Government-funded relationship education can work, The Atlantic, March 14, 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hsueh, J., Alderson, D. P., Lundquist, E., Michalopoulos, C., Gubits, D., Fein, D., & Knox, V. (2012). The Supporting Healthy Marriage evaluation: Early impacts on low-income families (OPRE Report No. 2012-11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lundquist, E., Hsueh, J., Lowenstein, A., Faucetta, K., Gubits, D., Michalopoulos, C., & Knox, V. (2014). A family strengthening program for low-income families: Final impacts from the Supporting Healthy Marriage evaluation. OPRE Report 2013-49A. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cowan, P. & Cowan, C. (2014). Controversies in couple relationship education: Overlooked evidence and implications for research and policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 361-383.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hawkins AJ, Blanchard VL, Baldwin SA, Fawcett EB. Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Oct;76(5):723-34. doi: 10.1037/a0012584.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18837590 (View on PubMed)

Hawkins AJ, Stanley SM, Blanchard VL, Albright M. Exploring programmatic moderators of the effectiveness of marriage and relationship education programs: a meta-analytic study. Behav Ther. 2012 Mar;43(1):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22304880 (View on PubMed)

Pinquart, M., & Teubert, D. (2010). A meta-analytic study of couple interventions during the transition to parenthood. Family Relations, 59, 221-231.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wood, R., McConnell, S., Quinn, M., Clarkwest, A., & Hsueh, J. (2010). Strengthening Unmarried parents' relationships: The early impacts of building strong families. Washington DC: Mathematic Policy Research.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167-177.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Abidin, R. R., & Brunner, J. F. (1995). Development of a parenting alliance inventory. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24(1), 31-40.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, Stokes J, Handelsman L, Medrano M, Desmond D, Zule W. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Feb;27(2):169-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12615092 (View on PubMed)

Driscoll, K., & Pianta, R. C. (2011). Mothers' and fathers' perceptions of conflict and closeness in parent-child relationships during early childhood. Journal of Early Childhood & Infant Psychology, (7).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hawkins, A. J., Bradford, K. P., Palkovitz, R., Christiansen, S. L., Day, R. D., & Call, V. R. (2002). The inventory of father involvement: A pilot study of a new measure of father involvement. The Journal of Men's Studies, 10(2), 183-196.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., & Levine, J. A. (1987). A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altmann, A. S. Rossi, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Parenting across the lifespan: Biosocial perspectives (pp. 111-142). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mdrc.org/publications/393/workpaper.html

Married and poor: Basic characteristics of economically disadvantaged married couples in the US. Working Paper SHM-01, Supporting Healthy Marriage Project, New York: MDRC

https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/innovative_parenting_b3_findings_dec_2019_0.pdf

Implementing an innovative parenting program for fathers: Findings from the B3 study OPRE Report 2019-111.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2021-12757

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TYRO Champion Dads Project Study
NCT05256992 COMPLETED NA