Prospective Assessment of Cost-effectiveness and Side-effects of Depressive Patients Treated With ECT or TCA
NCT ID: NCT05306184
Last Updated: 2024-04-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
220 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy Vs Medication to Prevent Relapses in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
NCT00000375
Acute Efficacy and 6 Months Follow up After Electroconvulsive Therapy
NCT05388461
Prediction of ECT Treatment Response and Reduction of Cognitive Side-effects Using EEG and Rivastigmine
NCT05768126
Prediction of Antidepressant Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy
NCT05630469
Optimizing Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression
NCT00045916
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, detailed information on the cost-effectiveness of ECT based on real-world data is lacking, as well as the comparative cost-effectiveness with respect to medication. Reliable information on outcomes of ECT in comparison with antidepressant treatment and its cognitive side-effects is needed for patients and clinicians to make a balanced and shared decision regarding choosing or refraining from ECT.
Objective:
Primary Objective: determine (cost)-effectiveness of ECT compared to medication by determining the impact of treatment for MDD with ECT or TCA on remission rates using a one-year time horizon (trial-based economic evaluation)
Secondary Objective: determine side-effects of ECT compared to medication by determining the impact of treatment with ECT or medication on side-effects and quality of life during a one-year follow-up
Study design: Observational, parallel inception cohort study of patients who will undergo standard clinical care according to current guidelines.
Study population: 110 patients (\>18 yrs.) with a depressive episode (unipolar MDD) who will start ECT (ECT group) and 110 patients (\>18 yrs.) with a depressive episode (unipolar MDD) who will undergo treatment with antidepressants will be recruited from specialized clinics (academic hospital, general hospital and GGz-institute) and followed-up for one year to gather reliable data on efficacy including relapse rates, cost-effectiveness, quality of life and cognitive functioning.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ECT group
110 participants with primary diagnosis of moderate to severe major depressive disorder receiving ECT as treatment
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
ECT
Medication group
110 participants with primary diagnosis of moderate to severe major depressive disorder receiving medication as treatment
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
ECT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* failed response to at least 1 adequate dose-duration trial with antidepressants
* moderate or severe depression (HDRS-17 \>16)
Exclusion Criteria
* the presence of a concurrent significant medical condition impeding the ability to participate
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GGZ inGeest
OTHER
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
OTHER
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
St. Antonius Hospital
OTHER
ETZ
UNKNOWN
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philip van Eijndhoven, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GGz inGeest
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
RadboudUMC
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Dore Loef
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-13224
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.