Ketamine as an Alternative Treatment to ECT in Major Depressive Disorder
NCT ID: NCT02659085
Last Updated: 2019-12-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
198 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2019-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients randomized to the experimental treatment receive intravenous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), delivered over a period of forty minutes thrice weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday). Patients in the control group receive ECT in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly. ECT was chosen as the reference treatment as it is the most effective treatment for patients suffering from moderate to severe depression.
Primary outcome is the proportion of patients in remission after 4 weeks of treatment in each arm. Remission is defined as a MADRS ≤ 10.
The study uses a non-inferiority design. Demonstrating superiority of ketamine was not an option based on the number of patients needed to gain sufficient power with such a design. Also, the investigators do not believe that ketamine treatment needs to be more effective, at least not in terms of the primary outcome. ECT is associated with side effects (in particular amnesia during the treatment period, but some patients also report persistent memory problems) and patients need to be anaesthetised under the supervision of a anaesthesiologist. The treatment is thus fairly demanding and expensive. A significant amount of patients are also unwilling to undergo ECT. Given non- inferiority of ketamine regarding the primary outcome, and given that it is associated with fewer side effects or shorter time to remission and does not involve the need for anaesthesia, in a risk-benefit analysis the scale might be tipped in favour of ketamine, even if it is not superior per se.
Secondary outcomes include proportion of patients in re mission and /or response and symptomatic relief at follow-up time points (3, 6 and 12 months after treatment cessation). Also addressed is how the two treatments affect cognition. A computerized test battery, the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) is administered prior to the first treatment, after two weeks, shortly after remission and at three additional time points (3, 6 and 12 months) after conclusion of the treatment. See figure for specification and description of cognitive tests.
Blood samples are drawn before the first treatment and 2-3 months after finishing treatment. Apart from plasma and serum samples (which will be used for later analysis of potential biomarkers such as IL 6 and D-serine), additional blood is collected for genomic DNA analysis. A total of 4 x 6 mL are taken at each occasion. Blood samples are stored at the regional biobank.
Time to response will be analysed with parametric survival analysis (for changes in MADRS score) or with non-parametric analysis of two-way ordinal data with repeated measurements34 (for ordinal data). Cognitive data and biological samples will be analysed with t-tests (paired or unpaired as appropriate) or with analysis of variance ANOVA.
Study sample size was calculated based on actual or assumed remission rates, the primary outcome parameter of the study. A remission rate of 60% was set for the reference treatment (ECT). A non-inferiority limit of 40% was set for the experimental intervention (ketamine). This is an arbitrary level, based on an assumption of fewer and milder side effects, faster antidepressant effect and the fact that the patients do not need to be anaesthetized and given muscle relaxants. With the above limits, a power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 97 patients are required in each arm, according to: n = (2 \* 8,4 \* p(1-p) / difference2), where "2" and "8,4" are derived from significance and power levels, p are the (actual and assumed) levels for the proportion of patients reaching remission for ECT and ketamine (60% and 40% respectively). The size of the cohort is calculated to be sufficiently large to detect ECT-associated cognitive side effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
ECT given in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly. Each participating clinic decides for each patient whether the treatment is given uni- or bilateral, as well as the exact stimulation parameters. Choice of anesthetic drug (e.g. thiopental of propofol) and muscle relaxant is done by local anesthesiologist. The procedure differs in no way from how a given patient would have been treated if he or she were not included in the study.
ECT
ECT given in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly.
Ketamine IV Infusion
Ketamin intra venous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5mg/kg), delivered over a period of 40 minutes thrice weekly, as ECT (Monday, Wednesday and Friday).
Ketamine IV Infusion
Patients randomized to the experimental treatment receive intravenous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), delivered over a period of forty minutes thrice weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) under supervision.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketamine IV Infusion
Patients randomized to the experimental treatment receive intravenous infusions of racemic ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), delivered over a period of forty minutes thrice weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) under supervision.
ECT
ECT given in line with standard procedures (including anesthesia, muscle relaxation and oxygenation) thrice weekly.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD, according to DSM-IV)
* Inpatients who have been offered and have accepted ECT
* Are eligible to participate
* Score ≥ 20 Points on Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
* Must be proficient in spoken and written Swedish
* American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) 1-3
Exclusion Criteria
* Habitual difficulties to speak, hear, remember or reason
* Treatment according to LPT (Lagen om psykiatrisk tvångsvård; Compulsory Psychiatric Care Act)
* On-going or recent (6 months) drug abuse
* Known allergy to the active substance
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Known cardiovascular disease, including angina, acute/chronic congestive heart failure, moderly hypertension or tachyarrhythmia (because exacerbation by sympathomimetic properties of ketamine)
* Pathological conditions in central nervous system with risk of increased intracranial pressure (increased ICP with ketamine)
* Glaucoma (increased IOP with ketamine)
* Porphyria or thyroid disorder (enhanced sympathomimetic properties by ketamine)
* Ongoing severe infection
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pouya Movahed Rad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pouya Movahed Rad
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pouya Movahed Rad, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine Lund University, Sweden
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Psychiatry
Lund, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-001520-37
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id