Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
175 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-10-15
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This infirmity may be short-lived and reversible in some, and yet others may transition into a permanent chronic disease state. The impact of EmLap on those individuals that "do not fully recover" is far-reaching and often interlinked, covering biological, social and psychological domains. This makes it difficult to describe the true problem, i.e. holistic morbidity and suggest an intervention to improve it.
The primary aim of this work is to describe the holistic morbidity of EmLap throughout the first year of a patient's recovery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Riskfactors of Post-operative Pain and Nausea After Ambulatory Gynaecological Laparocopy.
NCT05050708
Intravenous Administration of Magnesium Sulfate in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Cases
NCT05826119
Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) Versus Inhalational Anesthesia at The End of Laparoscopic Obstetric Surgery Regarding Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT07270289
The Effect of Cold Vapor on Nausea and Vomiting in the Early Postoperative Period After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05302128
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting
NCT05970055
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Emergency Laparotomy Patients
All adult patients (18+) who have undergone Emergency Laparotomy surgery, are recovering well (no illness which is expected to limit life to \<6m post op) and have sufficient English-language and cognitive skills to complete the study questionnaires.
Emergency Laparotomy
All patients undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
Family Caregivers
Adult (18+) family members, close friend or caregivers of the individual who has received EmLap treatment have sufficient English-language and cognitive skills to complete the study questionnaires.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emergency Laparotomy
All patients undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to communicate in English
* Cognitively able to complete the questionnaire
* Able to provide informed voluntary consent
* Undergone an EmLap during admission
* Clinical team anticipate to be "medically fit for discharge" within 48 hours (of consent)
Exclusion Criteria
* Acutely unwell at the time of recruitment. These patients may still be eligible and can be re-screened and recruited at a later date, should their condition improve.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
The Royal College of Surgeons of England
OTHER
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Paisley, Renfrewshire, United Kingdom
Julie Cornish
Cardiff, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Silva L, Abbas Mohamed S, Meggy A, Ng JH, Torkington J, Moug S, Watts T, Bisson J, Cornish JA. Psychosocial outcomes following emergency laparotomy (POLO) study: a study protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods prospective cohort study assessing the psycho-social outcomes following emergency laparotomy in adults. BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e081821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081821.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
8160
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.