Evaluation of Baby Friendly Spaces in Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
NCT ID: NCT05281575
Last Updated: 2022-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
600 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-11-28
2022-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Strengthening Bangladeshi Babies Brains (SBBB)
NCT04093934
Effects of Psychosocial Stimulation and Cash on Children's Development and Behaviour
NCT03281980
Evaluation of the Effects of Community-based Interventions
NCT00198731
Community Based Interventions to Reduce Neonatal Mortality in Bangladesh
NCT00198705
Enhancing Safe Sleep Practices of Urban Low-Income Mothers
NCT03070639
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As they are currently functioning, BFS activities in Cox's Bazar are not standardized as intended. Thus, this study will use a pre-post, paired randomized study design to compare two conditions being delivered within Integrated Nutrition Centres (INCs) in Cox's Bazar-based refugee camps: 1) treatment-as-usual BFS mental health and psychosocial support prevention and promotion activities (TAU BFS) as they are currently being offered; and 2) implementation-enhanced BFS activities (enhanced-BFS) that includes intervention standardization, re-training, and implementation supports. The primary outcomes being evaluated are symptoms of psychological distress and functional impairment, and secondary outcomes include subjective maternal wellbeing and coping skills. Although a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing BFS against a non-active control condition would provide the clearest evidence, such a design is not feasible in this context because the services are already being offered as a part of existing programming, and removal of any existing supports would be unethical. As such, the proposed study design uses current BFS practices occurring in Integrated Nutrition Centers (INCs) that have not been manipulated as part of the research (treatment as usual). These services are not manualized and have been affected by natural drifts in fidelity over time since initial training. In the intervention condition, psychosocial workers and psychologists at select INCs will be re-trained in a manualized version of the BFS program, and will continue to receive additional implementation support during the study through newly established supervision structures (enhanced-BFS).
As the experimental manipulation is occurring at the INC-level, INCs were paired by overseeing psychologist (as in some cases one psychologist oversees two sites) and randomize within the pair to intervention (BFS-enhanced) or treatment as usual control (BFS TAU). In addition to incorporating site matching in the design phase to help try to minimize bias in group comparisons while assessing the intervention as implemented in the real world, propensity score adjustments in the analysis approach will be leveraged. After completing the BFS intake, eligible and interested mothers are referred to a data collector to obtain informed consent and administer a baseline interview. Mothers can then participate in BFS to whatever extent they choose. The same data collector will follow up with each mother 8-10 weeks later to complete a follow-up interview. Because of logistical constraints, each INC has been assigned a single data collector to carry out study activities at that site. All sites will also record detailed information (as part of regular program monitoring) about activities delivered and received by women enrolled in BFS at the INCs. Two trained observers will rotate through the INCs to record fidelity data. This real-world comparison of an intervention implemented "as is" versus an enhanced program implemented with effort towards greater standardization and fidelity will provide insight about effectiveness of the program model and structures and resources that need to be in place to effectively implement the program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment as Usual BFS (TAU BFS)
Continuation of existing Baby Friendly Spaces program activities in integrated nutrition centers, which are not manualized and without re-training have naturally drifted in fidelity to the intervention and supervision approach due to time since initial training.
Baby Friendly Spaces (BFS)
Designed to meet the unique needs of populations living in humanitarian contexts, BFS focus on two domains: psychosocial support that targets maternal wellbeing and childcare practices that target caregiver functioning to also address child wellbeing and development. In so doing, BFS strengthens mothers' internal resources and skills in caring for their children both in quantity (time spent caring for the child) and quality (responsiveness), to positively impact the health status and wellbeing of their children. In BFS, the following activities are delivered by trained psychosocial workers: counselling for infant and young child feeding practices; hygiene education and promotion; mother-child bonding activities that provide psychosocial stimulation essential for children at risk of, or experiencing, malnutrition; and provision of maternal psychosocial support (i.e. psychoeducation, stress management).
Enhanced BFS
The implementation-enhanced BFS intervention includes re-training using newly developed training materials that focus on building core therapeutic engagement skills. Ongoing supports include brief guidance sheets for each of the most commonly delivered BFS activities, as well as newly established group supervision focused on BFS, discussion facilitation, activities and self-care.
Baby Friendly Spaces (BFS)
Designed to meet the unique needs of populations living in humanitarian contexts, BFS focus on two domains: psychosocial support that targets maternal wellbeing and childcare practices that target caregiver functioning to also address child wellbeing and development. In so doing, BFS strengthens mothers' internal resources and skills in caring for their children both in quantity (time spent caring for the child) and quality (responsiveness), to positively impact the health status and wellbeing of their children. In BFS, the following activities are delivered by trained psychosocial workers: counselling for infant and young child feeding practices; hygiene education and promotion; mother-child bonding activities that provide psychosocial stimulation essential for children at risk of, or experiencing, malnutrition; and provision of maternal psychosocial support (i.e. psychoeducation, stress management).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Baby Friendly Spaces (BFS)
Designed to meet the unique needs of populations living in humanitarian contexts, BFS focus on two domains: psychosocial support that targets maternal wellbeing and childcare practices that target caregiver functioning to also address child wellbeing and development. In so doing, BFS strengthens mothers' internal resources and skills in caring for their children both in quantity (time spent caring for the child) and quality (responsiveness), to positively impact the health status and wellbeing of their children. In BFS, the following activities are delivered by trained psychosocial workers: counselling for infant and young child feeding practices; hygiene education and promotion; mother-child bonding activities that provide psychosocial stimulation essential for children at risk of, or experiencing, malnutrition; and provision of maternal psychosocial support (i.e. psychoeducation, stress management).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The mother of a child under age 2 who is identified as suffering from moderate or severe acute malnutrition without complication by ACF
* Able to speak and understand Chittagonian dialect of Bangla
Exclusion Criteria
* Maternal cognitive impairment or psychosis that would preclude participation in program activities
* Referred per standard program practice to more specialized mental health or protection services outside of Action Contre la Faim (ACF)
* Planning to leave the area in the next 2 months
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
OTHER
University of Virginia
OTHER
University Research Co, LLC
INDUSTRY
Action Contre la Faim
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karine LE ROCH, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Action Contre la Faim
Sarah MURRAY, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Jonhs Hopkins University
Amanda NGUYEN, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Action Against Hunger
Cox’s Bāzār, , Bangladesh
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FY21-A01-6024
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FRGB2B-FR27
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.