Carotid Revascularization With MicroNet Covered Stent Comparing Early Neurological Outcomes With Distal Versus Proximal EPS

NCT ID: NCT05257161

Last Updated: 2022-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

366 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The SIBERIA study demonstrated a clear advantage of CGuard stent implantation over the existing classical stent when using a distal anti-embolic device. At the same time, there is no Level 1 evidence for a difference between the proximal and distal anti-embolic device for the CGuard stent.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patients With Aterosclerotic Carotid Stenosis Symptomatic Patients (Stenosis > 50%) Asymptomatic Patients (Stenosis ≥80%)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emboshield NAV6™ Embolic Protection System + CGuard™ (The CGuardTM Embolic Prevention System (EPS))

183 Carotid stenting (Emboshield NAV6™ Embolic Protection System + CGuard™ (The CGuardTM Embolic Prevention System (EPS))

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Emboshield NAV6™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Revascularization ( distal - filter) + stent CGuardTM™

MO.MA Proximal Cerebral Protection Device+ CGuard™ (The CGuardTM Embolic Prevention System (EPS)

183 Carotid stenting (MO.MA Proximal Cerebral Protection Device+ CGuard™ (The CGuardTM Embolic Prevention System (EPS))

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mo.Ma™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Revascularization ( proximal - occlusion) + stent CGuardTM™

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Emboshield NAV6™

Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Revascularization ( distal - filter) + stent CGuardTM™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Mo.Ma™

Embolic Protection System for Carotid Artery Revascularization ( proximal - occlusion) + stent CGuardTM™

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Emboshield NAV6™ Embolic Protection System Mo.Ma™ proximal cerebral protection device

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Consecutive patients 45-80 years old accepted for CAS following neurological consultation and qualification for the procedure according to center's routine practice.
2. More than 6-month life expectancy
3. Suitable clinical conditions for performing DW-MRI
4. Written Informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee
5. Subject agrees to all required follow-up procedures and visits

Exclusion Criteria

1. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study that has not completed the study or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints
2. Recent surgical procedure within 30-days before or planned surgery within 30-days after the stenting procedure
3. Hepatic active disease (bilirubin\> 35 mmol / l) or renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL or glomerular filtration rate \<60 ml / min)
4. Recent evolving acute stroke within 30-days of study evaluation
5. Myocardial infarction within 72 hours prior to carotid stenting procedure (CPK-MB \> 3 times normal)
6. Female patients of childbearing potential or known to be pregnant
7. Any known factor for potential stroke other than carotid stenosis, such as atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (paroxysmal, permanent or persistent) or thrombophilia
8. Patient on VKA or new oral anticoagulants
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

E. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Andrey A Kaprenko, MD

Role: CONTACT

+79139504100

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Andrey A Karpenko, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Montorsi P, Caputi L, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, Teruzzi G, Annoni A, Calligaris G, Fabbiocchi F, Trabattoni D, de Martini S, Grancini L, Pontone G, Andreini D, Troiano S, Restelli D, Bartorelli AL. Carotid Wallstent Versus Roadsaver Stent and Distal Versus Proximal Protection on Cerebral Microembolization During Carotid Artery Stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 24;13(4):403-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.007. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32007460 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SIBERIA 2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.