Carotid Artery Stenting With Emboli Protection Surveillance-Post-Marketing Study (CASES-PMS)
NCT ID: NCT00231231
Last Updated: 2007-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1500 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-09-30
2006-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
-PRECISE Nitinol Stent System (5F, 5.5F and 6F)
ANGIOGUARD™ XP Emboli Capture Guidewire (ECGW)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. The patient has a 50% stenosis (as determined by ultrasound or angiogram) of the common or internal carotid artery and is clinically symptomatic; i.e., within the previous 180 days has experienced symptoms in the ipsilateral carotid artery distribution, defined as:
* one or more TIAs, characterized by distinct focal neurologic dysfunction or monocular blindness with clearing of signs and symptoms within 24 hours, or
* one or more completed strokes (as defined by this protocol) with persistence of symptoms or signs for more than 24 hours (the most recent event is used as the qualifying event), except as excluded below, with stenosis \>50%, (as determined by ultrasound or angiogram) of the common or internal carotid artery, OR The patient must have a \>80% diameter stenosis (as determined by ultrasound or angiogram) of the internal or common carotid artery without neurological symptoms.
3. To be entered into the study, the patient must have one or more of the following conditions:
· congestive heart failure (class III/IV) and/or known severe left ventricular dysfunction LVEF \< 30%
* open heart surgery within six weeks
* recent MI (\>24 hours and \<4 weeks)
* unstable angina (CCS class III/IV)
* synchronous severe cardiac and carotid disease requiring open heart surgery and carotid revascularization
* severe pulmonary disease to include any of the following:
<!-- -->
1. chronic oxygen therapy
2. resting PO2 of 60 mmHg
3. baseline hematocrit 50%
4. FEV1 or DLCO 50% of normal. · contralateral carotid occlusion · contralateral laryngeal palsy · post-radiation treatment · previous CEA recurrent stenosis · high cervical ICA lesions · CCA lesions below the clavicle · severe tandem lesions
* abnormal stress test.
4\. The qualifying ultrasound or angiogram was performed less than 30 days prior to study entry.
· Stenosis \>50%: PSV\>130 cm/sec; EDV \<135 cm/sec
· Stenosis \>80%: PSV\>220 cm/sec; EDV \<135 cm/sec
· PSV ICA/PSV CCA ratio 4.0
5\. The target vessel is in the native common or internal carotid artery. The arterial segment to be treated has a diameter between 4 mm and 9 mm as the largest diameter either proximal or distal to the lesion.
Exclusion Criteria
2. There is any visual angiographic or ultrasound evidence of intraluminal thrombus thought to increase the risk of plaque fragmentation and distal embolization.
3. There is total occlusion of the target carotid artery treatment site.
4. The reference segment diameter (distal common carotid and internal carotid artery segment cephalic to the lesion) is less than 4mm or greater than 9mm. See Instructions For Use, for proper stent sizing. The exception to this would be with a lesion having \>95% stenosis where the true diameter of the distal vessel cannot be determined such as the case with a string sign or distal vessel collapse. In this case the judgment of the interventionalist will prevail with the intention not to oversize the stent to the distal vessel by more than 2mm.
5. The patient has any intracranial aneurysm (\> 9 mm).
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cordis Corporation
INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sidney A. Cohen, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cordis Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Katzen BT, Criado FJ, Ramee SR, Massop DW, Hopkins LN, Donohoe D, Cohen SA, Mauri L; CASES-PMS Investigators. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Aug 1;70(2):316-23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21222.
Schreiber TL, Strickman N, Davis T, Kumar V, Mishkel G, Foster M, Donohoe D, Britto S, Ansel G; CASES-PMS Investigators. Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: outcomes at 1 year. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 29;56(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.045.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P04-5204
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id