Comparison of Different CSF Sampling Sites on External Ventricular Drains
NCT ID: NCT05254353
Last Updated: 2024-07-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
55 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-31
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Estimation of Internal Jugular Vein Central Venous Pressure (CVP) by Ultrasound
NCT00904358
Non-invasive Assessments of Central Venous Pressure
NCT01079611
Doppler Sonography, MR Venography, Plethysmography for the Diagnosis of CCSVI
NCT01425554
Central Venous Pressure (CVP) Assessment by Ultrasound and Physical Examination
NCT01099241
Study of the Effectiveness of Central Line Placement Using an Ultraportable Ultrasound Device
NCT05692310
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A typical external ventricular drainage system consists of a ventricular catheter, which is nowadays usually impregnated with antibiotics (e.g. Codman Bactiseal - coated with clindamycin and rifampicin), an extension tube, a drip chamber, and a collection bag. Multiple three-way taps and access ports along its course allow for CSF sampling (or injection of therapeutics, such as tissue plasminogen activator, or saline to flush the catheter in case of blockage).
From a practical perspective, CSF sampling from the external ventricular drain is possible at all of these three-way taps and access ports. Broadly, one may sample CSF as proximally (close to the ventricle) as possible (e.g. by using the access port), or distally (at the level of the drip chamber, e.g. by using the three-way tap between the drip chamber and the collection bag). There is no consistency in for CSF collection site amongst different institutions. Traditionally, in UZ Leuven, we have been sampling CSF proximally until now.
The main theoretical advantage of proximal sampling is that actively aspirated "fresh" CSF close to the ventricle likely closely resembles the true characteristics of our study object, i.e. intraventricular CSF. Nevertheless, this approach is not without risk. First, it requires to directly access the sterile inside of the extension tube. This inherently comes with a risk of iatrogenic infection. Secondly, by aspirating the external ventricular catheter, the neurosurgeon may induce an iatrogenic haemorrhage in the brain parenchyma or the ventricle, and/or direct trauma to the brain parenchyma, as in suboptimally positioned catheters or small ventricles, white matter or choroid plexus may be aspirated along with CSF. Because of the risk of iatrogenic infections, haemorrhage or trauma, it is our institutional policy that CSF sampling from external ventricular drains is performed by neurosurgeons only. This also poses practical problems and may delay sampling, especially in patients who are not admitted to neurosurgical wards (e.g. paediatric cases).
From a theoretical perspective, distal CSF sampling, at the level of the drip chamber, has multiple advantages. First, the risk of iatrogenic infections induced by CSF sampling is likely to be lower, as there is no direct contact between the CSF in the drip chamber and the intraventricular CSF. Secondly, there is no risk of inducing haemorrhages or brain trauma, as no "active" aspiration is required for CSF sampling. Hence, distal CSF sampling can perhaps also be carried out by physicians from other fields than neurosurgery, or by trained nurses. However, theoretically, it is possible that the characteristics of CSF sampled distally do not sufficiently resemble those of intraventricular CSF.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with EVD
Analyses of proximal and distal samples
Evaluate the difference between proximal and distal CSF samples
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Analyses of proximal and distal samples
Evaluate the difference between proximal and distal CSF samples
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from the subject. If the subject is not capable of self-consent, all efforts will be made to locate a legally acceptable representative to act on behalf of the subject.
When the patient is considered capable to consent but physically unable to sign an informed consent form and a representative is not available an impartial witness can attend the informed consent process.
\- Males and females of all ages, including children and pregnant females
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe De Vloo, prof.dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UZ Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S65845
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.