Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-31
2025-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research demonstrates that weight gain of less than 2.3kg (4.8 pounds) by week 4 of FBT predicts that 75% of adolescents with AN will not achieve weight restoration by the end of treatment. FBT works in part by reducing the avoidance of food and increasing the exposure to food triggers, like the treatment of anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thus, researchers postulate that anxiety may be a negative predictor of FBT treatment outcome in the early phase of FBT. In addition, elevated baseline anxiety has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes at end of treatment and may also impact the likelihood of early response.
To improve clinical response, we need to develop viable biological treatment targets (i.e., brain areas implicated in anxiety) that could be combined with FBT. Such targets can be defined by 1) initially targeting brain areas that mediate symptoms hindering treatment response (i.e., anxiety), and 2) looking at changes in brain chemistry and function.
Thus, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could be an alternative and promising treatment approach for adolescents with AN who do not respond to Phase 1 of FBT. Using rTMS, we can target the brain areas implicated in anxiety in people with anorexia and modulate that activity to reduce symptoms, and thus, facilitate response to FBT. Several studies have shown the rTMS to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is effective in reducing anxiety across a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. Therefore, it is possible that stimulating the right DLPFC could facilitate treatment efficacy of FBT in youth with AN. Additional explorations of the connections between, and neurochemistry of, the right DLPFC and those mediating emotion in the brain (e.g., amygdala) could aid in our understanding of the networks impeding effective treatment responses and allow for more tailored, precision targeting with TMS.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adaptive Family Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa
NCT01579682
Family-Based Treatment at Home in Adolescents With Eating Disorders and Co-occurring Mental Health Conditions
NCT06792227
Acceptance-Based Separated Family Treatment for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa
NCT01274416
Feasibility Study Comparing Standard FBT and Guided Self-Help FBT for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa
NCT04957498
Family Functioning and Adverse Side Effects of Family-based Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa
NCT06097247
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research demonstrates that weight gain of less than 2.3kg (4.8 pounds) by week 4 of FBT predicts that 75% of adolescents with AN will not achieve weight restoration by the end of treatment . There continues to be limited empirical research and clinical knowledge about what differentiates those who consistently gain weight and those who do not in the critical window for weight gain in the first month of FBT. FBT works in part by reducing the avoidance of food and increasing the exposure to food triggers, similar to the treatment of anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Thus, researchers postulate that anxiety may be a negative predictor of FBT treatment outcome in the early phase of FBT. In addition, elevated baseline anxiety has been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes at end of treatment, and may also impact the likelihood of early response.
While FBT is the first-line treatment for adolescents with AN, response is unfortunately not universal. An understanding of the neurobiology of AN could potentially improve treatment development and response. Unfortunately, the neurobiology of AN is poorly understood, and in turn, neuroscientifically-sound treatments are lacking. In order to improve clinical response, we need to develop viable biological treatment targets (i.e. brain areas implicated in anxiety) that could be combined with FBT. Such targets can be defined by 1) initially targeting brain areas that mediate symptoms hindering treatment response (i.e. anxiety), and 2) looking at changes in brain chemistry and function.
Thus, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could be an alternative and promising treatment approach for adolescents with AN who do not respond to Phase 1 of FBT. rTMS involves a safe, non-invasive, painless application of a magnetic field over the skull to a target brain area in order to change its activity and function. Using rTMS, we can target the brain areas implicated in anxiety in people with anorexia and modulate that activity to reduce symptoms, and thus, facilitate response to FBT. Several studies have shown the rTMS to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is effective in reducing anxiety across a range of neuropsychiatric disorders. Furthermore, some studies have shown that rTMS is effective in reducing core symptoms of anorexia in adults, however, this has yet to be explored in adolescents. Therefore, it is possible that stimulating the right DLPFC could facilitate treatment efficacy of FBT in youth with AN. Additional explorations of the connections between, and neurochemistry of, the right DLPFC and those mediating emotion in the brain (e.g. amygdala) could aid in our understanding of the networks impeding effective treatment responses and allow for more tailored, precision targeting with TMS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS parameters are intensity 110% resting motor threshold (RMT), frequency 1Hz, duration = 30 minutes (1800 stimulations), targeting the right DLPFC. To target the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for rTMS treatment we will use the traditional method (i.e. the 5cm rule; George et al., 1995, 1996; Herwig et al., 2001, 2003; MacMaster et al., 2019), in which the TMS coil is placed 5 cm anterior to the participant's motor cortex along a line to the nasion. Treatments will occur on weekdays at the same time of day for 4 weeks (20 total).
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS involves a safe, non-invasive, painless application of a magnetic field over the skull to a target brain area in order to change its activity and function.
Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
For the sham rTMS group, a sham coil is used: this sham method does not emit any magnetic field, and therefor does not affect brain activity, but it does produce auditory sensations that is indistinguishable from active rTMS in naïve subjects
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS involves a safe, non-invasive, painless application of a magnetic field over the skull to a target brain area in order to change its activity and function.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
rTMS involves a safe, non-invasive, painless application of a magnetic field over the skull to a target brain area in order to change its activity and function.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English fluency (i.e., able to consent and assent to the study)
* Aged 12 to 18
* Medically stable
* Medications for AN or psychiatric disorders are allowed if the dose has been stable for six weeks with adequate compliance, with a commitment to not change medication/dosage during the trial period. If a medication change occurs, the research team will document this.
Exclusion Criteria
* Impediments to TMS or MRI (i.e., braces, having non-MRI compatible metals in the body)
* Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder
* Diagnosis of post-concussive syndrome
* Plans to move/be unavailable for clinic visits for 6 to 9 months after the start of treatment
12 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank P MacMaster, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB21-0472
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.