Effect of Cocoa Supplementation Peripheral and Autonomic Diabetic Neuropathy
NCT ID: NCT05247034
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
39 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-04
2024-09-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Cocoa is a food with a high content of flavonoids, which are phenolic compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Additionally, its consumption has been associated with a decrease in hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, improvement in mitochondrial function, and, based on the above, an effect on diabetic complications has been suggested; This has been demonstrated in in vivo and in vitro models, but not in the human population.
Once the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy have started, palliative treatments are prescribed, and to date there are no pharmacological compounds that have been shown to reverse the consequences of diabetic peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. Additionally, clinical trials of compounds with antioxidant properties have only performed subjective evaluations based on questionnaires on the perception of the improvement of diabetic neuropathy and some biochemical markers or nerve conduction tests, however, the results shown have not been conclusive.
This is why a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial is proposed, with the objective of evaluating the effect of cocoa supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral and autonomic diabetic neuropathy on a) the biochemical profile, which includes the evaluation of the glycemic and lipid profile, quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers; b) the clinical profile through the application of standardized questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and blood pressure, and c) somatosensory processing through the paired pulse H reflex test.
The hypothesis of this study is that cocoa supplementation will have a beneficial effect on the biochemical and clinical profile and somatosensory processing of peripheral and autonomic diabetic neuropathy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Diabetic Neuropathy
NCT04253860
Peripheral Nerve Block in Patients With Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
NCT04699734
The Effect of Intraneural Facilitation Therapy on Diabetic Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT04025320
Efficacy and Safety Study of TAK-128 in Treating Subjects With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT00229437
Vitamin C Supplementation as a Preventive Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT00634998
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cocoa is a food with a high content of flavonoids, which are phenolic compounds with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Additionally, its consumption has been associated with a decrease in hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, improvement in mitochondrial function, and, based on the above, an effect on diabetic complications has been suggested; This has been demonstrated in in vivo and in vitro models, but not in the human population.
Once the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy have started, palliative treatments are prescribed, and to date there are no pharmacological compounds that have been shown to reverse the consequences of diabetic peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. Additionally, clinical trials of compounds with antioxidant properties have only performed subjective evaluations based on questionnaires on the perception of the improvement of diabetic neuropathy and some biochemical markers or nerve conduction tests, however, the results shown have not been conclusive.
This is why a double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial is proposed, with the objective of evaluating the effect of cocoa supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral and autonomic diabetic neuropathy on a) the biochemical profile, which includes the evaluation of the glycemic and lipid profile, quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers; b) the clinical profile through the application of standardized questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and blood pressure, and c) somatosensory processing through the paired pulse H reflex test. Hypothesis: The hypothesis of this study is that cocoa supplementation will have a beneficial effect on the biochemical and clinical profile and somatosensory processing of peripheral and autonomic diabetic neuropathy. Statistical analysis: For the evaluation of the intragroup variables, a statistical analysis will be carried out with ANOVA for repeated samples with Tukey's post hoc, or, where appropriate, Friedman with Dunn's post hoc, as well as Student's t for dependent groups, or in its case, with Wilcoxon. The intergroup comparison will be made with Student's T for independent samples, or if applicable, with Mann Whitney's U, considering p \<0.05 as statistical significance and using the statistical software GraphPad Prism version 5.
The H reflex test will be performed by electrical stimulation through disposable surface electrodes connected to a constant current bipolar electrical stimulator (Digitimer DS8R). The recording of the electrophysiological signals will be carried out using surface electrodes connected to the signal acquisition and amplification system (LabChart and PowerLab 8/35, ADInstruments). The signals obtained will be sampled at 10 kilohertz (KHz) with a 0.5- 500 Hz band-pass filter. The signals will be stored in a computer for later analysis.
The placement of electrodes for stimulation will be carried out as follows: the active electrode (anode) at the level of the Achilles tendon, the positive electrode (cathode) above the inverted "v" between the calf muscles (gastrocnemius). Subsequently, the reference electrode will be placed at the level of the gastrocnemius heads. It will be stimulated behind the knee where the tibial nerve has its anatomical path.
The test will start with an intensity of 0 milliamp (mA) and then pulses will be given every 0.5 millivolts (mV) until the evoked potential (H reflex) is observed in a consistent and clearly identifiable way as a function of latency (35-45 ms). The electrical stimulus consists of the application of 1 square pulse (1 ms duration each pulse) every 10 seconds (10 pulses in total). The maximum intensity of the applied current will be according to the sensitivity and tolerance of the individual in both lower limbs during the tests on the sensory and motor nerves. The applied electrical pulse should not cause a painful sensation, but it can cause a tingling sensation. The test will be suspended if the individual reports pain or does not wish to continue with the research protocol. The "H" reflex test will be done in two parts. The first part of the protocol consists of determining the stimulus intensity vs. amplitude of motor responses from the appearance of the "M" wave and the "H" wave, for which the electric current will be increased in steps of 0.5 µA until the appearance of the waves. For this part, only one electrical pulse (1 ms duration) will be given every 10 seconds. The intensity of electrical current that will be used for the second part of the protocol will be that whose value in the amplitude curve of the H wave-electrical current intensity reaches 60% of the maximum amplitude. This stimulation value guarantees the reproducibility and minimum variability of this wave, which also prevents muscle contraction that contaminates the electrical register. The second part constitutes the paired electrical stimulation test in which two electrical pulses (1 ms in duration) will be produced at different frequencies between the pulses: 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 Hz. The interval between the paired pulses will be 10 s, until completing 10 series.
The electrophysiological recordings will be analyzed with the Clampfit 10.0 software. The latency and amplitude of the evoked potentials H1 and H2 will be determined for each electrical pulse and at all stimulation frequencies, taking the stimulus artifact as a reference. Subsequently, the ratio of the amplitude of the paired H2/H1 pulses will be determined to establish the modulation of spinal excitability. A ratio ≥0.6 for any stimulation frequency will be considered as an indicator of dysfunction in somatosensory processing according to Marshall et al.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
Diet for patients with diabetes + 4 capsules of cocoa powder, 500 mg each, daily for 12 weeks.
Cocoa
Each capsule of cocoa powder contains 12.5 mg of flavonoids, providing a total of 50 mg per day.
Control group
Diet for patients with diabetes + 4 capsules of methylcellulose 500 mg each, daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Each capsule contains 500 mg of methylcellulose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cocoa
Each capsule of cocoa powder contains 12.5 mg of flavonoids, providing a total of 50 mg per day.
Placebo
Each capsule contains 500 mg of methylcellulose
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum time of diagnosis of T2DM of 5 years
* Who have a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) score ≥2
* Male and Female
* Have them sign the informed consent letter
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who do not attend one of the intermediate consultations
40 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Anahuac University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rebeca Kababie Ameo
Sponsor-Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Cuéllar-Ramos, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Anahuac University
Gabriela Gutiérrez-Salmeán, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Anahuac University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universidad Anáhuac México Norte
Huixquilucan, State of Mexico, Mexico
Centro de Especialidades del Riñón
Naucalpan, State of Mexico, Mexico
Clínica de Medicina Familiar "Nueva Oxtotitlán" ISSSTE
Toluca, State of Mexico, Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202094
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
202103
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.