Efficacy and Safety Study of TAK-128 in Treating Subjects With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

NCT ID: NCT00229437

Last Updated: 2012-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

343 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-03-31

Study Completion Date

2006-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of TAK-128, once daily (QD), in treating subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Polyneuropathy is a frequent complication of diabetes; it affects most individuals after prolonged hyperglycemia, and diabetic neuropathy is very common in the developed world. Chronic, insidious, distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy with autonomic impairment is the most typical form of diabetic neuropathy. Less common, but more florid presentations include autonomic symptoms or painful neuropathy. Although many patients have no or relatively few symptoms, the chronic polyneuropathy and autonomic dysfunction predispose to neurotrophic foot ulceration; consequently, diabetes is the leading cause of amputation today.

Diabetic neuropathy is a dying-back polyneuropathy with distal degeneration of the longest nerve fibers advancing in a centripetal direction. Multiple histopathological changes are observed, but progressive fiber loss is the hallmark of diabetic polyneuropathy. Other important features include endothelial cell basement membrane thickening, segmental demyelination and remyelination, and axonal atrophy. Similar pathological changes are observed in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The severity of neuropathy as indicated by the stage of nerve fiber loss determines the clinical, electrophysiological, and quantitative sensory threshold features of this disorder. The functional measures of electrophysiological and quantitative sensory thresholds reflect the morphological changes and the clinical features.

Diabetic polyneuropathy is etiologically related to prolonged hyperglycemia with multiple consequences. Although strict glycemic control prevents neuropathy in type 1 patients if maintained for many years, similar interventions in those with type 2 diabetes mellitus are less successful. Type 2 patients may have neuropathy with considerable nerve fiber loss at the time of diagnosis because of unsuspected hyperglycemia in preceding years. Reversal of established neuropathy with strict glycemic control is not certain to occur, even if maintained for many years. Co-morbid disease often interferes with strict management of type 2 diabetes. Even among those with type 1 diabetes, a minority of patients are successful in maintaining prolonged euglycemia.

TAK-128 is a novel synthetic compound being developed as a treatment for diabetic neuropathy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Neuropathies

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TAK-128 5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAK-128

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-128 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

TAK-128 50 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAK-128

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-128 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

TAK-128 100 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TAK-128

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-128 100 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

Placebo QD

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-128 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TAK-128

TAK-128 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-128

TAK-128 50 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

TAK-128

TAK-128 100 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

TAK-128 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 6 months.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female subjects of childbearing potential must be nonpregnant, nonlactating and on an acceptable form of contraception.
* The subject has fasting clinical laboratory evaluations within the normal reference range for the testing laboratory, or if not, the results must be deemed not clinically significant by the investigator prior to randomization.
* The subject has type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus using World Health Organization Criteria.
* The subject has mild to moderate peripheral neuropathy defined as:

* Clinical neuropathy score greater than or equal to 2.5 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument.
* Confirmed abnormality of at least 2 nerve conduction study velocity parameters as defined by the Neurological Core Laboratory.
* Sural sensory nerve potential amplitude greater than or equal to 1 microvolt.
* The subject's glycosylated hemoglobin is less than or equal to 10%.
* The subject is on stable diabetic therapy for at least 3 months prior to randomization.
* The subject is on stable pain medication for at least 6 weeks prior to randomization, if applicable.
* The subject's creatinine level is less than or equal to 2 mg/dL or 176.8 umol/L.
* The subject is willing to follow an American Diabetes Association or similar recommended dietary regimen.

Exclusion Criteria

* The subject has a history of other neuropathies due to causes other than diabetes such as alcohol abuse liver or renal disease, uremia, toxic exposure, genetic factors, inflammatory demyelinating diseases, monoclonal gammopathies; or endocrine, metabolic or nutritional disorders (included treated or untreated pernicious anemia).
* The subject has clinical or electrophysiologic evidence of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome.
* The subject has a significant skin abnormality or ulcerative changes in their lower extremities.
* The subject's body mass index is greater than 40 kg/m2.
* The subject's systolic blood pressure is greater than 160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure is greater than 95 mm Hg.
* The subject has a history of myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty or bypass graft, unstable angina pectoris, transient ischemic attacks, significant electrocardiograms, or documented cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Screening, or is New York Heart Association Functional Cardiac Classification III or IV.
* The subject has an alanine aminotransferase level of greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
* The subject has a significant, actively treated or unstable pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematologic, musculoskeletal, or endocrine (other than diabetes mellitus or stably treated hypothyroidism) disease.
* The subject has a previous history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma, that has not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
* The subject has taken lipoic acid, linolenic acid (primrose oil), inositol, topiramate, Acetyl-L-Carnitine, nerve growth factors, or capsaicin within 30 days prior to Screening.
* The subject has any other serious disease or condition at Screening or at randomization that might affect life expectancy or make it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
* The subject has a history of drug abuse (defined as illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) within the past 2 years.
* The subject has a known hypersensitivity to a compound related to TAK-128.
* Subjects can not use any of the following prescription medications throughout the duration of the study, including:

* Lipoic acid
* Linolenic acid (primrose oil)
* Inositol
* Topiramate
* Acetyl-L-Carnitine
* Nerve growth factors
* Capsaicin
* The subject currently is participating in another investigational study or has participated in an investigational study within the past (30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plant City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Morrisville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

North Bay, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sarina, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Laval, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1128-5843

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-04-TL-128-003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of Rocker sOles in Diabetis
NCT02891928 COMPLETED PHASE4