Evaluation of Sarcopenia With SARC-F and Anthropometric Measurement
NCT ID: NCT05241886
Last Updated: 2022-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
190 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-01
2019-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Sarcopenia on General Health Status in Elderly: a Population-based Study
NCT05918159
Evaluation of Physical Performance in Old Adults With Sarcopenic Obesity
NCT06299241
Sarcopenic Obesity: Estimation of Prevalence and Identification of Clinical and Biological Determinants in a Population of Adult Obese Patients
NCT03394469
Evaluation of the SARC-F Score as a Screening Tool for Undernutrition in a Geriatric Population
NCT03553147
Sarcopenia and Related Factors in Lipedema
NCT05739279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Data collection tools:
1. General information collection form: Investigator collect data about age, gender, chronic diseases, economic status, etc of participants
2. Measurement of Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Gait Speed Body composition analysis was determined by electrical bioimpedance using the Tanita MC-780 multi-frequency segmental Body Composition Analyzer (Tanita Corporation, Tokyo). The appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) was calculated with the Janssen equation for EWGSOP criteria and Sergi equation for EWGSOP 2 criteria. The appendicular muscle mass index (ASMI) was calculated based on the equation: ASM(kg) /height (m2).
Muscle strength (kg) was assessed with the Takei Grip Strength Dynamometer®. Handgrip strength (HS) measurements were made with the subjects in a sitting position, with the elbow and wrist in full extension, three times with an interval of five seconds on both hands, and the highest value among the measurement results was used for analysis. Gender-specific cut-offs were used to define low muscle strength (30 and 20 kg in males and females) for EWGSOP criteria, and (27 and 16 kg in males and females) for EWGSOP 2 criteria. Usual gait speed (m/s) was performed by the subjects walking 4 m with usual speed and ≤0.8 m/s was defined as low walking speed.
3. Anthropometric measurement:
In all participants, height was measured using a stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm, weight was measured unclothed to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated balance scale. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by the weight (kg)/height (m2) equation.
The calf circumference (CC) of participants was measured with an inflexible tape measure, in the sitting position, with the knee flexed to 90º, and the circumference of the widest part of the calf. Both the standard CC cut-off (\<31 cm) and population-specific cut-off (\<33 cm) were used and compared in SARC-CalF analysis. Mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) was measured in a stand position, the mid-point of the participant's left upper arm- located between the acromion and olecranon- was marked when the elbow bent to a 90o angle and measured with the inflexible tape around the marked midpoint with the participant's arm hung down naturally.
4. Screening of sarcopenia risk and assessment of sarcopenia SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-MUAC were used for screening sarcopenia risk. For the SARC-F total score of ≥4, SARC-CalF ≥11, and SARC-MUAC≥11 were defined as positive sarcopenia risk. Investigator used EWGSOP and EWGSOP 2 criteria for sarcopenia diagnosis.
5. Statistic analysis: SPSS 25.0 (SPSS Statistics; IBM, Armonk, NY) and MedCalc Statistical Software 19.1.6-free trial (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) statistical package programs were used for statistical analysis. The level of significance was defined as p\<0.05.
For categorical variables, the data were presented as numbers (percentage). Continuous variables with normal or skewed distribution were presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), respectively. Group differences were investigated using the t-test for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney test for skewed data and the X2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical data was used. Using EWGSOP and EWGSOP 2 criteria as the reference standard, the investigator calculated the diagnostic value of the SARC-F, SARC-CalF- 31, and SARC-CalF-33 \[sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy\] for identifying sarcopenia. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to compare the overall accuracy of SARC-F, SARC-CalF-31, and SARC-CalF-33. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
The exclusion criteria are as follows: an implanted pacemaker, severe mental illness, unable to walk, severe heart failure, severe renal failure, clinically visible edema, and unable to communicate.
Participants in which all the evaluations in the research protocol were carried out and answered all the questions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
anthoropometric measurement, SARC- F questionnare
SARC-F, CC, MUAC
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ege University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yasemin Atik Altinok
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
yasemin A Atik-Altinok, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University
Devrim Bozkurt, Assoc Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ege University
Sumru Savaş, Assoc Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University
Reci Meseri, Assoc Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University
Fulden Saraç, Prof Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University
Fehmi Akçiçek, Prof Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ege University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ege University
Izmir, Bornova, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abd-El-Gawad WM, Abou-Hashem RM, El Maraghy MO, Amin GE. The validity of Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index: simple tool for prediction of nutritional-related complication of hospitalized elderly patients. Comparison with Mini Nutritional Assessment. Clin Nutr. 2014 Dec;33(6):1108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
Ates Bulut E, Soysal P, Dokuzlar O, Kocyigit SE, Aydin AE, Yavuz I, Isik AT. Validation of population-based cutoffs for low muscle mass and strength in a population of Turkish elderly adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Sep;32(9):1749-1755. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01448-4. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Bahat G, Yilmaz O, Kilic C, Oren MM, Karan MA. Performance of SARC-F in Regard to Sarcopenia Definitions, Muscle Mass and Functional Measures. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(8):898-903. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1067-8.
Fu X, Tian Z, Thapa S, Sun H, Wen S, Xiong H, Yu S. Comparing SARC-F with SARC-CalF for screening sarcopenia in advanced cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov;39(11):3337-3345. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.020. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
Sergi G, De Rui M, Veronese N, Bolzetta F, Berton L, Carraro S, Bano G, Coin A, Manzato E, Perissinotto E. Assessing appendicular skeletal muscle mass with bioelectrical impedance analysis in free-living Caucasian older adults. Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug;34(4):667-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
da Luz MCL, Pinho CPS, Bezerra GKA, da Conceicao Chaves de Lemos M, da Silva Diniz A, Cabral PC. SARC-F and SARC-CalF in screening for sarcopenia in older adults with Parkinson's disease. Exp Gerontol. 2021 Feb;144:111183. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111183. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Hajaoui M, Locquet M, Beaudart C, Reginster JY, Petermans J, Bruyere O. Sarcopenia: Performance of the SARC-F Questionnaire According to the European Consensus Criteria, EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Sep;20(9):1182-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.05.021. No abstract available.
Drey M, Ferrari U, Schraml M, Kemmler W, Schoene D, Franke A, Freiberger E, Kob R, Sieber C. German Version of SARC-F: Translation, Adaption, and Validation. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):747-751.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Sarcopenia001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.