Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-03
2025-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Deep Brain Stimulation for Autonomic and Gait Symptoms in Multiple System Atrophy
NCT03593512
Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Movement Disorders
NCT02119611
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Movement Disorders
NCT01581580
DBS and SCS Therapy Improve Motor Function in Multiple System Atrophy With Predominant Parkinsonism
NCT04617873
Using DBS to Probe Basal Ganglia Dysfunction
NCT04080674
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Multiple System Atrophy is a form of Parkinsonism and is a neurodegenerative condition that is characterized by gait and autonomic failure. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of aDBS of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus (PPN) on autonomic and gait symptoms in a group of 5 patients with MSA. Patients will enter our routine selection process but patients in the study will be selected for predominantly autonomic symptoms as per the inclusion criteria below. The aim is to test whether or not PPN aDBS improves quality of life, and has an effect on a variety of measurable autonomic parameters in this subset of patients. Secondary aims are to assess the safety of DBS in MSA, and to look at the structural projections and effects on brain networks associated with stimulation.
Background:
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a routine treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). In Oxford, around 80 DBS operations per year are performed, and approximately two thirds of these are in patients with PD. Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a 'Parkinsonian' condition similar to PD and is a progressive, incurable, neurodegenerative condition characterized by a combination of Parkinsonism, ataxia, and autonomic failure. Any one of these three features may predominate, making diagnosis difficult; however, virtually all patients have autonomic dysfunction. Indeed, autonomic dysfunction is the presenting feature in half of patients that have Parkinsonism or ataxia predominant MSA. The motor manifestations such as gait problems, ataxia, and postural abnormalities are very similar to those encountered by patients with Parkinson's disease, though unfortunately are usually less responsive to dopamine agonists and so can be more disabling. Patients tend to progress more quickly, often confined to a wheelchair within 3-5 years of diagnosis, and death is usually within a decade.
Whilst DBS has sometimes been performed for the treatment of MSA, including in Oxford , the primary outcome measure is usually the motor outcome, despite the fact that the autonomic symptoms are probably the predominant factor in causing a reduced quality of life. This is because DBS is traditionally used to control motor symptoms and the exploration of its effects on autonomic function are relatively new, and pioneered by the investigators.
The most common complaints caused by autonomic dysfunction in MSA are related to orthostatic hypotension and neurogenic bladder. The former causes dizziness, fatigue and, when a severe fall in BP occurs on standing, can lead to collapse. This may be, at least in part, a cause for the numerous falls that these patients suffer. Part of the aim of this study is to look at orthostatic BP changes with and without stimulation and see whether these are improved by DBS. This may correlate with a reduction in falls, although this study is unlikely to be powered to answer this specific question. Other 'autonomic' problems include bladder dysfunction, sleep disorders, exercise intolerance and problems with thermoregulation and sweating. These will be captured using questionnaires.
Regarding the target used for DBS, a well-established target to improve gait and postural abnormalities in PD is the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). It has been demonstrated that the PPN is also a brain area that, when stimulated, improves bladder function in these patients. It has also been shown that PPN stimulation reduces postural fall in BP in a group of PD patients treated primarily for gait and postural problems. Whilst these studies provide a rationale for looking at similar parameters in MSA patients, this study aims to answer the question as to whether it will work for these symptoms in MSA, in addition to the motor symptoms routinely treated.
The investigators have already shown in 5 patients with MSA that these symptoms are improved with PPN DBS. The difference in this trial is the usage of a new DBS device. This is a novel device where stimulation parameters can be changed in response to changes in the patient's position, activity, or physiological parameters.
Usage of adaptive stimulation:
The investigators intend to study the usage of motion-based control of stimulation. In the current trial, the main aim is to assess the effects of DBS on gait, sleep, and blood pressure control.
In previous studies, the investigators have noted that while standing, blood pressure is increased with stimulation, as is lying blood pressure. Supine hypertension may increase the stroke risk for these patients. Furthermore, the best improvement in gait is seen with a slightly different stimulation waveform.
In order to correct for this, the investigators propose to introduce motion-based adaptive stimulation which would involve the use of an accelerometer in changing between different stimulation parameters depending on the patient's position - so delivering a different waveform for lying and standing.
Justification/importance:
A trial of DBS to assess the effect on autonomic symptomatology of MSA has never been performed. We aim to combine a five patient clinical pilot study of DBS for MSA with an investigation of the neural circuitry underpinning autonomic control.
This translational strategy is likely to lead to a larger efficacy study of DBS for MSA as well as revolutionizing neural-based treatments in other autonomic disorders such as orthostatic hypotension and pure autonomic failure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Deep brain stimulation
All patients will undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation with results compared before and after stimulation
Deep brain stimulation
Electrical pulses from implanted generator that adapts to patient activity and/or physiology
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Deep brain stimulation
Electrical pulses from implanted generator that adapts to patient activity and/or physiology
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \>6/12 in the autonomic subsection (Q9-12) of the UMSAR scale
* Patient willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study.
* Male or female aged 55 years or over
* Able to walk (to perform gait analysis)
* Have an anticipated prognosis \> 2 years
Exclusion Criteria
* The patient is unwilling to participate or unable to give informed consent.
* The patient has been deemed unfit for stimulator insertion by their healthcare team i.e. surgical contraindications to DBS:
* Bleeding or coagulation disorder
* Not fit for general anaesthetic
* Unable to deal with implanted DBS system (turn on and off and recharging where applicable, although it is acceptable if a carer can do this)
* Untreated anxiety or depression
* Unable to undergo preoperative MRI (e.g. metal implants)
* Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm.
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
University of Oxford
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20/LO/1034
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.